Rosenverse
SAFe or Sorry?

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

SAFe or Sorry?

Wednesday, May 29, 2019 • Enterprise Community
Share the love for this talk
SAFe or Sorry?
Speakers: Jack Moffett
Link:

Summary

In his article for Forbes titled Understanding Fake Agile, Steve Denning refers to SAFe as “codified bureaucracy”. Jared Spool says it’s a “fast path to mediocrity”. But the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is currently in use by many enterprise organizations like NASA, Capital One, FedEx, and the Department of Defense. With so many companies attempting to become as agile as Silicon Valley startups, SAFe is being adopted as a way to scale up Agile software development processes, and many UX teams are having to support it, whether they like it or not.

Key Insights

  • •

    SAFe scales agile by organizing multiple agile teams into Agile Release Trains aligned on synchronized iteration schedules.

  • •

    Lean UX is typically added to SAFe as an afterthought, creating a hybrid decentralized model where a UX Center of Excellence supports multiple teams.

  • •

    Due to limited UX resources, embedding a UX person in every agile team is usually impossible; training team members and using design systems help alleviate this.

  • •

    Program Increment (PI) Planning is a key SAFe event to visualize dependencies and align teams around shared work and schedules.

  • •

    Working UX one or more iterations ahead of development is important to validate hypotheses but risks creating mini-waterfalls with handoffs.

  • •

    Story pointing UX work alongside development stories can improve capacity planning and make UX effort visible to the teams.

  • •

    Product Owner and Product Manager roles in SAFe can be confusing and sometimes reversed compared to other agile methodologies, causing role conflicts.

  • •

    Smaller SAFe implementations (as low as 100-125 people) can still benefit from the framework, especially for managing inter-team dependencies.

  • •

    Effective collaboration between UX, requirements analysts, and business analysts is crucial due to different focuses: user experience vs. business process.

  • •

    A risk of SAFe is codified bureaucracy that may isolate agile teams from customers, potentially undermining true business agility.

Notable Quotes

"Each Agile Release Train is a long-lived team of agile teams that delivers solutions incrementally within a value stream."

"If something is not ready by the time the train leaves the station, then it catches the next train."

"There aren’t enough lean UX experts to collaborate with every team, so we create a lean UX Center of Excellence for each value stream."

"Our PI planning events are like 600 people strong, including representatives from across our 6,000 person company."

"Story pointing UX work would help us plan capacity and avoid being surprised by last minute discovery work."

"SAFe is very developer-centric and was originally designed for construction—the code production part of software."

"In SAFe, product owner and product manager roles are reversed from what some teams expect, which causes confusion."

"PI Planning really helps visualize dependencies between teams, which was invisible before."

"If the entire firm isn’t operating the same agile script, you won’t get the benefits of scaled agile."

"Steve Denning says SAFe is codified bureaucracy where the customer is almost totally absent."

Ask the Rosenbot
Jackie Velasquez-Ross
Talent Acquisition and Our Responsibility
2020 • DesignOps Community
Maverick Chan
From Doodle to Demo: AI as Our Storytelling Partner
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Mariesa Lenz
What Beekeeping Taught me about Product Teams
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Jemma Ahmed
Collaboration: learning from other fields beyond our own [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Benjamin Real
Maturity Models: A Core Tool for Creating a DesignOps Strategy
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
John Calhoun
Meters, Miles, and Madness: New Frameworks to Measure the (Elusive) Value of DesignOps
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Luca Rager
Empowering Gaming at Scale: How Xbox Builds Powerful, Automated, and Distributed Design Systems with Sketch
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Mansi Gupta
Drawing from Feminist Practice to Make Inclusive Design Operational
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Jack Moffett
SAFe or Sorry?
2019 • Enterprise Community
Emily Lessard
RFPs Without Tears: Writing Inclusive RFPS that Don't Scare Away Talent
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Erin Weigel
Testing and Experimentation Tools
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Stephen Anderson
Puzzled? How to Coordinate Humans for Complex Challenges
2021 • Enterprise Community
Matt Bernius
Learnings from Applying Trauma-Informed Principles to the Research Process
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Ha Phan
Running Out of So-Whats
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Nick Cochran
Growing in Enterprise Design through Making Connections
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Marc Rettig
The Urge to Migrate
2026 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"Think of a creative professional as an ideas athlete or a creativity Olympian."

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"There’s been a huge convergence because everybody’s got a mobile device now and expects a certain kind of experience."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"The weakest insight method might win simply because of the relationship to the power structure."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"How do you organize a design team to work within a changing environment without freaking everybody out."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"We may not have tech prowess but our sticky notes, card sorts, and test reports are our real superpowers."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"Operations tends to be something companies only think about when they are scaling rapidly, but investing early is essential."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"It’s very difficult to align researcher goals with business growth, but that’s exactly what we try to do."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"When things start to go bad, we’re going to pull the plug on it immediately—that helps build trust."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"You’ve got to take control of the backlog and position your team as value-driven, not just servicing individual teams."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books