The Tension Between Story Collecting and Story Telling in Research
Summary
Key Insights
-
•
The ethical dilemma in story collecting extends beyond ownership to who controls and legitimizes the narrative—the participant or the researcher.
-
•
Stories are fundamental to human identity and meaning-making, as emphasized by Pam LaRutledge and Thomas King.
-
•
Storytelling has the power to disrupt dominant narratives, especially for marginalized communities whose histories have been silenced.
-
•
Listening in storytelling activates mirror neurons, fostering empathy through shared commonalities.
-
•
Researchers and participants often occupy different power positions, leading to divergent stories during interviews.
-
•
Anthropology’s colonial roots and the colonial gaze influence how stories have been historically collected, necessitating reflexivity.
-
•
Positionality is fluid, relational, and multifaceted, affecting access and power throughout the research process.
-
•
Co-creation during interviews can share power through mutual storytelling and authentic listening.
-
•
Normative research principles like researcher neutrality and confidentiality can obscure participant agency and may not serve all participants equally.
-
•
Using invitational language and allowing participants choice encourages richer, participant-led narratives and challenges rigid research scripts.
Notable Quotes
"Whose story gets told, the participant or the researcher, is also a question of knowledge production."
"Stories are how we make meaning of life, explain how things work, and justify our decisions."
"The truth about stories is that is all that we are – Thomas King."
"Storytelling has the power to disrupt hegemonic narratives and open space for people to be authors of their own stories."
"Mirror neurons are triggered when we listen to a story, allowing us to empathize by identifying shared commonalities."
"Researchers and participants cannot tell the same story because they occupy different locations of power."
"Reflexivity lets us examine our beliefs and practices during research to understand how we show up."
"Awareness of positionality is the first step toward ethical change in research."
"Instead of pretending neutrality, be open and transparent about the research agenda with participants."
"Invitational language allows participants to be in charge of a part of the interview, making the exchange authentic."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If you said are you creative, I’m gonna say hell yeah."
Dr. Karl JeffriesThe Science of Creativity for DesignOps
January 8, 2024
"I never want to walk into a review with my stakeholders at the SVP level and see something for the first time."
Amy MarquezINVEST: Discussion
June 15, 2018
"The weakest insight method might win simply because of the relationship to the power structure."
Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian RohrerDiscussion
May 13, 2015
"Involving designers early in the process is crucial to avoid the 'fast-food' model where they feel like order takers."
Alicia MootyDesign Staffing Models
September 30, 2021
"Puppetry lets you communicate like, I don’t like what you said, how come you said that to me."
Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt LaurenceThe Authentic UX Talent Show
January 8, 2024
"Simply asking stakeholders what success looks like for them in a project is a powerful way to start meaningful conversations."
Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne RogondinoTheme 1: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"Research isn’t linear; it’s messy and modular, so your tools have to reflect that fluidity."
Sofia QuinteroThe Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ
March 10, 2021
"You are not the first person to try something like this, and they’re typically not looking forward to the next transformation."
Laura KleinUnique challenges of innovation in enterprises
April 23, 2020
"Combining the what we see in data with the why we get from user research is where true insights live."
Andrew MichaelBuilding a Product Insights Team
March 10, 2022
