Rosenverse
5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)

Gold
Friday, March 12, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Share the love for this talk
5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
Speakers: Lily Aduana , Savannah Hobbs and Brittany Rutherford
Link:

Summary

Oftentimes companies rely on recruiting agencies to handle finding participants for their research. While there are some advantages to this approach, and cases where outsourcing is the best option, nowadays bringing research in-house can be simple, flexible, cost-effective, and fast. Learn more about how and why to bring your recruiting in-house.

Key Insights

  • •

    Recruitment agencies typically require a two-week quoting and setup process before starting data collection.

  • •

    User Interviews allows immediate project launch with a median first participant arrival time of just three hours.

  • •

    Researchers gain full transparency on who applied, qualified, and confirmed directly via a dashboard with User Interviews.

  • •

    User Interviews includes built-in fraud detection to prevent professional testers and scammers from skewing data.

  • •

    Recruitment fees via agencies can range from $100 to $400 per participant plus administration fees; User Interviews fees range from $40 to $80 without upfront costs.

  • •

    User Interviews enables direct messaging with participants throughout the recruitment and study process, reducing no-shows and enhancing troubleshooting.

  • •

    Researchers can flex screening criteria on participants in real-time within User Interviews when necessary.

  • •

    Scheduling integrates with Google and Outlook calendars, allowing researchers to set availability and avoid double bookings.

  • •

    User Interviews supports various study types: 1-on-1 interviews, focus groups, diary studies, moderated and unmoderated research.

  • •

    Pilot studies are recommended and easy to conduct on User Interviews to test screener questions and study protocols before full launch.

Notable Quotes

"When working with an agency, the quoting process takes about two weeks before recruitment even starts."

"With User Interviews, you can launch a project immediately and get your first qualified participant as fast as three hours."

"You get a dashboard that shows who applied, who qualified, and even who didn’t qualify—all in real time."

"Professional testers are very crafty; one even changed her name repeatedly to get recruited multiple times."

"You only pay for successfully completed sessions on User Interviews—no upfront cost, no fees for no-shows or cancellations."

"I message participants regularly during studies to reduce no-shows and troubleshoot any issues immediately."

"If I forgot a critical screener question, I just messaged all qualified participants to confirm they meet the criteria before approval."

"Scheduling syncs with your Google or Outlook calendar so you only book participants at times that work for you."

"User Interviews offers multi-country recruitment at the same price, supporting Canada, UK, Germany, Australia, and South Africa."

"Pilot studies are a must; I always run a pilot session the day before full launch to refine my discussion guide."

Ask the Rosenbot
Peter Van Dijck
Building impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 2: Evals are your moat
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Megan Blocker
Panel: Excellence in Impact
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Kritika Sony
Moving AI offscreen: Exploring failures, constraints, and recovery in physical game design
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Gold
Jaime Creixems
Best Practices when Creating and Maintaining a Design System
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Katie Johnson
Disrupting generative AI products with just-in-time consumer insights
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Kate Towsey
Participant Recruitment and Management Tools
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Bram Wessel
Enterprise Information Architecture
2020 • Enterprise Community
Sam Proulx
To Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Tanya Snook
Designing the team experience: Building culture through onboarding
2021 • Enterprise Community
Louis Rosenfeld
How to use the Rosenbot
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Llewyn Paine
Day 1 Using AI in UX with Impact
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks Day 2
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Corey Nelson
Layoffs
2022 • Advancing Research Community
Brian Moss
What Does it Mean to be a Resilient Research Team?
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Iain McMaster
Design and Product: from Frenemy to Harmony
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
Coffee with Lou: Should You Write a (UX) Book?
2024 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"Are you creative? Such a loaded question, isn't it?"

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"Creating internal champions in client organizations helps improve adoption and reduces churn."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"When you look at data without training, confirmation bias makes you just find what you already believe."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"It took a lot of relationship building and conversations to break down the perception that designers' time was owned by particular teams."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"For the right audience, if applied correctly, humor and music can move people in many ways."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"Simply asking stakeholders what success looks like for them in a project is a powerful way to start meaningful conversations."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"Data entry is the enemy; automation is the key to making research repositories successful."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"You are not the first person to try something like this, and they’re typically not looking forward to the next transformation."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"Without Jim, what we're going to see today would have been a lot worse."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books