Rosenverse
Building impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 2: Evals are your moat

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Building impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 2: Evals are your moat

Wednesday, July 23, 2025 • Rosenfeld Community

This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Building impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 2: Evals are your moat
Speakers: Peter Van Dijck
Link:

Summary

The secret ingredient for impactful AI products is “evals”—an architecture for ongoing evaluation of quality. Without evals, you don’t know if your output is good. You don’t know when you’re done. Because outputs are non-deterministic, it’s very hard to figure out if you are creating real value for your users, and when something goes wrong, it’s really tricky to figure out why.

Simply Put’s Peter van Dijck will demystify evals, and share a simple framework for planning for and building useful evals, from qualitative user research to automated evals using LLMs as a judge.

Key Insights

  • •

    AI product development involves three layers: model capabilities, context management, and user experience, with evals central to experience quality assurance.

  • •

    Automated evals help scale testing of AI with inherently open-ended inputs and outputs, enabling faster iteration cycles with confidence.

  • •

    LLMs can serve as judges (evaluators) of other LLM outputs, which works because classification is cognitively easier than generation.

  • •

    Defining what 'good' means for an AI system is a detailed, evolving process informed by research, domain expertise, and observed risks.

  • •

    A three-option evaluation (e.g., yes/no/maybe) works better than fine-grained scales for consistent automated scoring by LLMs.

  • •

    Synthetic data, generated by LLMs based on manually created examples, efficiently expands dataset breadth and usefulness.

  • •

    Domain experts are essential for tagging data and establishing quality criteria, especially for high-stakes areas like healthcare or legal.

  • •

    Building effective evals requires substantial effort—expect 20-40% of project resources devoted to this work.

  • •

    Cultural differences impact subjective evals like politeness, requiring localization and careful domain definition.

  • •

    AI product quality management is a strategic ongoing commitment, extending beyond initial development into production monitoring and iteration.

Notable Quotes

"AI products almost always have both open-ended inputs and outputs, which makes testing really hard."

"You have to build a detailed definition of what is good for my system to do meaningful automated evals."

"It’s much easier to classify an answer than to generate an answer, and that’s why LLM as a judge works."

"You don’t want to give too many options like rating from one to ten because consistency gets lost between different LLM calls."

"Synthetic data is useful because it’s easier to generate more examples of something you already have than to create entirely new data."

"If you launch in the US and politeness is an issue, first try to fix it with prompts; only if that fails should you build an eval."

"Evals are really your intellectual property—they define what good looks like in your domain."

"Domain experts are crucial for tagging data because users might say ‘that’s great,’ but experts can tell it’s totally wrong."

"You should plan 20 to 40 percent of your project budget on evals—it’s a lot more work than most people expect."

"This is where UX and product strategy bring huge value—defining what good means rather than leaving it to engineers alone."

Ask the Rosenbot
Lada Gorlenko
Theme 1: Intro
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Janaki Kumar
Innovate with Purpose
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Sha Hwang
The Lost Year
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Lisa Welchman
Cleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Andreas Huebner
What Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Jon Fukuda
Coordinating Human-Centered Organizations in the Post-AI Era
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Yolanda Rankin
Black Feminist Epistemology as a Critical Framework for Equitable Design
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Leisa Reichelt
Opening Keynote: Operating in Context
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Jennifer Kong
Journeying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Daniel Gloyd
Designing From the Inside Out: How Method Acting Can Inspire Design Research
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Wendy Johansson
Be a Product Boss!
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Sam Proulx
To Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Christopher Taylor Edwards
Design as a Team Practice, A Practical Guide to Cross-functional Collaboration
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Jennifer Strickland
Adopting a "Design By" Method
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Doug Powell
Closing Keynote: Design at Scale
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Abby Covert
Is the shift greater than the sum of its parts?
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"Are you creative? Such a loaded question, isn't it?"

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"Show them, don’t tell them — involving stakeholders early builds skin in the game and helps control quality."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"The weakest insight method might win simply because of the relationship to the power structure."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"It took a lot of relationship building and conversations to break down the perception that designers' time was owned by particular teams."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"I believe there's really no such thing as a boring place at the state of mind."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"Field usability testing showed stakeholders immediately how much value UX can add by catching issues before deployment."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"We think about research as the magnetic field that attracts every part of the business into alignment around the customer."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"Please don’t chop off that engine until the new one is built because you are not the only one on this plane."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"You’ve got to take control of the backlog and position your team as value-driven, not just servicing individual teams."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books