Rosenverse
Building Trust Through Equitable Research Practices

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Building Trust Through Equitable Research Practices

Gold
Friday, November 18, 2022 • Civic Design 2022
Share the love for this talk
Building Trust Through Equitable Research Practices
Speakers: Lisa Spitz and Nikki Brand
Link:

Summary

User research helps you engage the people who will use the service you’re building, increasing the likelihood that you’ll create something that truly meets peoples’ needs. But equitable recruitment—ensuring that you’re engaging users from all walks of life—can be difficult to achieve.

Traditional user research practices often exclude people like those who don’t have access to the internet or can’t take time off work, but who might most need to access a service. While there is no one-size-fits-all solution for promoting equitable research, we aim to share inclusive and respectful research practices that foster trust with research participants and government stakeholders.

Attendees will gain an understanding of Nava's approach to conducting user research, lessons learned, best practices, and how our work contributes to more equitable access to public services for millions of people and vulnerable populations across the country. Participants will hear examples from Nava's research and walk away with concrete practices they can implement in their work.

Key Insights

  • •

    Nava deliberately shifts recruitment focus from a homogenous group to underrepresented communities to ensure equitable user research.

  • •

    Building trust with government partners starts early through collaboration on research planning, including co-creating research briefs and interview guides.

  • •

    Providing detailed interview guides to stakeholders increases transparency and helps build trust in the research process.

  • •

    Remote user research conducted since 2020 offers greater scheduling flexibility and participation diversity but also has limitations.

  • •

    Plain language consent forms improve participant understanding and respect during research sessions.

  • •

    Active listening and reiterating stakeholder feedback throughout the process prevents misalignment and loss of trust.

  • •

    Nava fosters capacity building by enabling government stakeholders to shadow, conduct, and synthesize research themselves for long-term independence.

  • •

    Tracking and analyzing diversity metrics across studies on a quarterly basis helps identify recruitment gaps and informs ongoing improvements.

  • •

    Recruitment challenges persist for certain groups like Hispanic/Latino origin, older adults, and lower income participants despite varied outreach methods.

  • •

    Collaborations with community-based organizations are critical to accessing vulnerable or hard-to-reach populations and supporting non-English speakers.

Notable Quotes

"Bringing our government Partners in early as collaborators and making a clear case for the value of research is one way that we build trust with our stakeholders."

"Every single thing that we would plan to say to the participant is spelled out in this interview guide to build transparency and trust."

"We prioritize speaking with people who are most in need of support so we can better understand and design for all potential users of PFML."

"Since March 2020, we’ve actually conducted all of our interviews remotely, which generally makes scheduling with diverse groups easier."

"Participants can skip any questions they don’t feel comfortable answering; most demographic questions are optional to respect privacy."

"We actively coach Department of PFML staff to shadow and eventually run their own research sessions so they’re empowered long-term."

"We use a participant matrix and assign pseudonyms to protect personally identifiable information throughout research."

"We constantly analyze our recruitment data and note that we still struggle to reach Hispanic or Latino origin individuals, older adults, and lower-income participants."

"Conducting retrospectives on research processes helps us identify bias, recruitment challenges, and improve methodology continuously."

"Being transparent and walking stakeholders through our process creates moments for reflection and keeps the whole team aligned."

Ask the Rosenbot
Bria Alexander
Welcome
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Noah Bond
Redefining truth and inclusivity: Navigating data ownership and ethical research in the age of disinformation
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Shipra Kayan
Emerging principles for using AI in Design: What the product design team at Miro has learned from deeply integrating AI in their workflow
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Ben Davies
Expert Panel: The Principles of Research Repository Design
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Nidhi Singh Rathore
Embracing participation to unlock deeper truths in commercial research
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Robin Cannon
AI means your design system can't suck anymore
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Charles Lee
Building a New Home for the Atlassian Design System
2020 • Enterprise Community
Jason Mesut
Shaping design, designers and teams
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Cennydd Bowles
Exit Interview #2: Rediscovering the ethical heart of design
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Louis Rosenfeld
Closing Words
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Megan Blocker
Theme 2 Intro
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Dorelle Rabinowitz
The Magic Word is Trust
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Hugh Dubberly
Problems with Problems: Reconsidering the Frame of Designing as Problem-Solving
2019 • Enterprise Community
Elizabeth Sklar
Co-creating research enablement with your tech org: a case study
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Savannah Carlin
Don't botch the bot: Designing interactions for AI
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Anna Poznyakov
Get The Most Out Of Stakeholder Collaboration—and Maximize Your Research Impact
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"Creativity fuels design, design fuels innovation."

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"The culture between buyer and user impacts feature adoption and overall satisfaction."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"The weakest insight method might win simply because of the relationship to the power structure."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"Involving designers early in the process is crucial to avoid the 'fast-food' model where they feel like order takers."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"The only rule is to maintain your smile and just to feel the being that have fun."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"We never compromise on the business goals, but how we achieve them can be flexible and pragmatic."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"I didn’t want to be part of that as a founder, hacking attention just to fulfill engagement metrics."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"If you think innovation can happen without buy-in from the CEO, I would love to see that; I have not seen it work."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"Embedded squads build domain expertise but risk losing knowledge if someone leaves, while centralized teams help reduce duplicated effort."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books