Rosenverse
Hands-on AI #2: Understanding evals: LLM as a Judge

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Hands-on AI #2: Understanding evals: LLM as a Judge

Wednesday, October 15, 2025 • Rosenfeld Community

This video is featured in the Evals + Claude playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Hands-on AI #2: Understanding evals: LLM as a Judge
Speakers: Peter Van Dijck
Link:

Summary

If you’re a product manager, UX researcher, or any kind of designer involved in creating an AI product or feature, you need to understand evals. And a great way to learn is with a hands-on example.

In this second talk in the series, Peter Van Dijck of the helpful intelligence company will show you how to create an eval for an AI product using an LLM as a judge (when we use a Large Language Model to evaluate the output of another Large Language Model). We’ll have a look at how that works, but also dig into why this even works. Are we creating problems for ourselves when we let an LLM judge itself? This talk is hands on; and there will be plenty of time for questions.

You will go away understanding when and how to use LLM as a judge, and build some product sense around how the best AI products today are built, and how that can help you use them more effectively yourself.

Key Insights

  • •

    Evals are a foundational feedback loop defining what 'good' means for AI products, helping to measure and improve systems continuously.

  • •

    Evaluating fuzzy, subjective AI outputs requires innovative approaches such as using LLMs as judges to score results.

  • •

    Binary (yes/no) scoring is more reliable than rating scales with ranges because LLMs lack internal memory and consistency.

  • •

    Starting evals early (week one of a project) drastically improves AI product outcomes, but many teams delay due to perceived complexity.

  • •

    High-risk or important tasks should be prioritized for evals instead of attempting broad coverage.

  • •

    Assigning a dedicated owner or 'benevolent dictator' for evals who works closely with domain experts accelerates feedback and quality.

  • •

    Creating a written constitution of principles helps concretize AI behavior goals and guides prompt and model training.

  • •

    Most current eval tooling is too technical, slowing iteration cycles and making expert involvement inefficient.

  • •

    Custom feedback interfaces tailored to expert users significantly speed up evaluating AI outputs in domains like healthcare and law.

  • •

    Diverse perspectives from UX, product, strategy, and domain experts are critical in defining and refining what 'good' means in AI systems.

Notable Quotes

"Evals are everywhere, right? Everybody's talking about evals. It is like one of the key things in developing useful AI products."

"You want to ask an LLM to evaluate the fuzzy stuff because there’s no black and white output."

"LLMs don’t have memory, so rating on a scale from one to five is pretty random. Better to have yes or no answers."

"One of the biggest problems in AI building is evolving your prompts and having a fast feedback loop."

"By starting to categorize risk in detail, you naturally lead to better prompts and better evals."

"A constitution is a very good exercise: write down your system’s principles and values to help guide its behavior."

"Use custom systems for experts to quickly review and rate outputs, making feedback cycles much faster."

"Evals define a shared definition of good with tests to measure it, and that is the secret sauce for building great AI products."

"Model companies are students in a classroom wanting good points—they’re happy to run external expert evals to improve."

"The more I work with evals, the more I think UX and product people need to be involved because of the need for diverse perspectives."

Ask the Rosenbot
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Alla Weinberg
How to Build and Scale Team Safety
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Rachel Garb
Exit Interview #8: Facing a blank slate in retirement when constraints are all you’ve ever known
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Amy Jiménez Márquez
The Atypical UX Manager Path
2020 • Enterprise Community
Benjamin Wiedmaier
Redefining Toolkits: Unbundling to Create a Perfect Match
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
Trauma-Responsive Design: Reimagining the Future of Design Now
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Alexandra Schmidt
Enterprise UX Playbook
2022 • Enterprise Community
Sarah Brooks
Fireside chat with Sarah Brooks and Jen Pahlka
2021 • Civic Design Community
Louis Rosenfeld
The Rosenbot and the Rosenverse: An AMA with Lou Rosenfeld
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Theresa Slate
Why Changing Hearts & Minds Doesn’t Work When Promoting DE&I Efforts, but Checklists Do
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Frances Yllana
The Big Question about Impact: A Panel Discussion
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Dan Hill
Designing for the infrastructures of everyday life
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Spencer L. A. Stultz
Why Social Justice Frameworks are Necessary for Successful DEI/JEDI Initiatives
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Ha Phan
Running Out of So-Whats
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Neema Mahdavi
Operationalizing DesignOps
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Marc Fonteijn
Increase your confidence, influence, and impact (through a Professional Community)
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"I was talking with a person who said I’m like an idea machine, a 24-7 idea machine. The reply was immediate. It isn’t, you get used up and spat out."

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"Investment is attention: If the business funds you, it means they believe in what you do."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"Both tribes really believe in doing awesome for customers, that’s our common ground."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"Constant communication is necessary; agreement emails can’t be one-and-done."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"Puppetry lets you communicate like, I don’t like what you said, how come you said that to me."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"We never compromise on the business goals, but how we achieve them can be flexible and pragmatic."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"Choosing a research repository is a big battle in your organization; the right decisions can really help you succeed."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"Nobody loves it when someone from another department shows up to tell people how to do their jobs better."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"Data analysts and user researchers rarely work together effectively, which is one of the biggest missed opportunities."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books