Rosenverse
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young

Thursday, December 12, 2019 • Advancing Research Community

This video is featured in the UX Watch Party playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young
Speakers: Indi Young
Link:

Summary

In tech culture, everyone is hell-bent on coming up with answers and solutions. We all assume we know what the person’s problem is; rarely does tech culture start at the very beginning, understanding the variety of approaches real people have to their real purposes and different moods and contexts. Instead, we build an idea into experiments to see if it solves the imagined “problem.”

Sound familiar?

We can’t go on solving things based on our own thin understanding of how others perceive the problem. We can’t go on assuming everyone is in the same mood and context. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Indeed, we have done a lot of accidental harm in the world with the assumption that the tools we design are “neutral.” We need to get better at paying attention. We need to slow down and gather a richer, more nutritious understanding of the people we are trying to support. And we need to point a beam of light into possible future outcomes.

Let’s put equal emphasis on the problem. Spending equal time in the problem space generates rich understanding. Understanding the depths, perspectives, horizons and histories of the way people achieve their purposes opens up loads more opportunities. We can begin making solutions that eschew “engagement” to truly support different people in different ways.

The problem space deserves more attention and a slow cycle all of its own.

Key Insights

  • •

    Most organizations overemphasize solutions and ignore deep understanding of users’ purposes in the problem space.

  • •

    Big data correlations often lead to misleading conclusions if context and underlying reasoning aren’t explored.

  • •

    Demographic breakdowns like age or gender rarely capture the true diversity of user thinking and motivations.

  • •

    Thinking Styles are a more meaningful way to segment users based on their purposes and mental approaches.

  • •

    Listening sessions provide rich qualitative data necessary to build cognitive empathy and uncover deep user insights.

  • •

    Cognitive empathy is a skill that requires going beyond surface observations to understand people’s inner voices.

  • •

    Technology disciplines are immature compared to fields like architecture or museum design that prioritize varied user purposes.

  • •

    Most tech companies operate without proper ethical research oversight (e.g., institutional review boards).

  • •

    Jobs to Be Done is useful for strategy but inadequate alone without rich qualitative problem space research.

  • •

    Rich problem space research results remain valuable and relevant for years, unlike short-term solution testing data.

Notable Quotes

"We live in a solution culture that glorifies people who create solutions but not those who create knowledge."

"Correlation is not causation, and a lot of people in technology don’t understand that."

"Research theater is when results are designed just to create a reaction, not real understanding."

"Purpose is a super important word—understanding what a person is trying to get done, not just their behavior."

"You can’t meaningfully segment users by demographics alone if you want to support their real purposes."

"Cognitive empathy only forms with depth; you can’t build it at the surface level."

"Empathy is not sensitivity or an emotion—it is a skill that you have."

"Most technology research is not research at all but at best focus group testing, and often lacks ethics."

"We have this piece of glass and there’s a person on the other side, but we don’t understand their purpose."

"You have to build all the puzzle pieces with clear summaries before the patterns come together in mental models."

Ask the Rosenbot
Wyatt Hayman
Global Research Panels
2020 • DesignOps Community
Sean Fitzell
Craft of User Research: Building Out Jobs to be Done Maps
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Elana Chapman
Getting started with accessibility research
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Sam Proulx
Designing For Screen Readers: Understanding the Mental Models and Techniques of Real Users
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Sarah Gallimore
Inspire Progress with Artifacts from the Future
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Ivana Ng
Level Up Your Program with ProductOps
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Dominique Ward
The Most Exciting Time for DesignOps is Now
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Taylor Jennings
Repository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Sam Proulx
Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Billy Carlson
Tips to Utilize Wireframes to Tell an Effective Product Story
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Lisa Gironda
Opener: Chief of Staff–An unexpected journey
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Dem Gerolemou
Climate technology fundamentals
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Wendy Johansson
An Education on Design Education for Orgs
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Patrick Commarford
Design Staffing for Impact
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Mariesa Lenz
What Beekeeping Taught me about Product Teams
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Sean Dolan
A Practical Look at Creating More Usable Enterprise Customer Journeys
2019 • Enterprise Community

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"Tech workers in the UK are five times more depressed than the UK average, with stress killing creativity."

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"Creating internal champions in client organizations helps improve adoption and reduces churn."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"When you look at data without training, confirmation bias makes you just find what you already believe."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"Constant communication is necessary; agreement emails can’t be one-and-done."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"Research in science fiction helps make research real and creative all the time."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"Operations tends to be something companies only think about when they are scaling rapidly, but investing early is essential."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"It’s very difficult to align researcher goals with business growth, but that’s exactly what we try to do."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"Please don’t chop off that engine until the new one is built because you are not the only one on this plane."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"Embedded squads build domain expertise but risk losing knowledge if someone leaves, while centralized teams help reduce duplicated effort."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books