Rosenverse
A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust

Friday, April 28, 2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Share the love for this talk
A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust
Speakers: Chris Engledowl
Link:

Summary

Quantitative instruments are frequently sought because 1) they can be quickly fielded to lots and lots of people, and 2) when carefully sampled, they can be generalizable to the population of users/customers. However, because many times the focus is on speed to launch because decision-makers need results quickly, there is not much depth given to their development, nor an investigation of the validity evidence. In the session, I will share a framework that centers validity and is necessarily a mixed methods approach to research. I will also share ideas on how to scale the research over time so that findings and insights are able to be iteratively delivered to stakeholders, while also iteratively informing one another in a qual-quant research dance that brings more trustworthy, user-centered evidence to decision-makers. Finally, I will share ideas for a course I am developing for supporting qualitative researchers to become more mixed in their approach.

Key Insights

  • •

    Validity involves five evidence sources: content, response processes, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences of testing.

  • •

    Qualitative methods, especially cognitive interviews, are crucial for understanding how respondents interpret survey items, supporting validity.

  • •

    Surveys should be treated as products that need ongoing iteration and testing, not one-off tools.

  • •

    Ethical considerations extend beyond data privacy to how survey results affect user experience and product decisions.

  • •

    Mixed methods approaches leverage both qualitative insights and quantitative analyses to build a stronger validity argument.

  • •

    Breaking down survey validation work across multiple teams and 'bite-sized' efforts makes the process manageable.

  • •

    Revising surveys over time to improve validity complicates measuring change longitudinally but increases trustworthiness.

  • •

    Stakeholder buy-in improves when validity processes are communicated as phased insights offering tangible results quickly.

  • •

    Analyses such as factor analysis and Rasch modeling reveal survey internal structure and help identify item bias across subpopulations.

  • •

    It is important to revisit validity considerations continuously, especially after product or user base changes.

Notable Quotes

"Validity is the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores for proposed uses."

"Qualitative research in a mixed methods setting needs to think about validity to support the bigger validity argument."

"What would happen if you do think about validity? Would it change your process or research plans?"

"Surveys are products too, so they need to be iteratively tested."

"You don’t know what you don’t know. Let’s write surveys that cover those blind spots."

"If the survey wording changes, measuring change over time becomes difficult, but improving the survey builds trust."

"Ethical considerations should go beyond typical privacy reviews and think deeply about user impact throughout the process."

"It is better to partner with someone who has quantitative expertise to interpret internal structure analyses."

"Management and stakeholders often care more about getting usable information quickly than understanding the full validity process."

"We can get quick insights in phases to keep teams engaged and slowly build a complete validity argument."

Ask the Rosenbot
Mansi Gupta
Drawing from Feminist Practice to Make Inclusive Design Operational
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Sol Mesz
Hands or Brains? How to Hire for Strategy, Strategically
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Megan Blocker
What UX research maturity looks like and how we get there [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Christian Crumlish
AMA with Christian Crumlish, author of Product Management for UX People
2022 • Enterprise Community
Sam Proulx
Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Sarah Gallimore
Inspire Progress with Artifacts from the Future
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Max Gadney
Assessing UX jobs for impact in climate
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Failure Friday #4: Invisible Work: How I Stalled My Career by Not Showing My Work
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Anna Avrekh
Expert Panel: Leading in and with Research
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Michael Polivka
Scaling Design through Relationship Maps
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Eric Shumake
An AMA on UX's Role in Healthcare
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Séamus Byrne
Aligning Teams with Choreography
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Nick Lewis
Designing and building low-carbon websites independently
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group
Matteo Gratton
Can Data and Ethics Live Together?
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Niko Laitinen
Adaptable Org Design for Resilient Times
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Alëna Iouguina
Designing Systems at Scale
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"If you value innovation and design, then you're investing in creativity."

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"Creating internal champions in client organizations helps improve adoption and reduces churn."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"Enterprise UX is still nascent—businesses worldwide are just beginning to figure out where UX fits."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"One designer's security in a dedicated model may be another designer's stagnation."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"I believe there's really no such thing as a boring place at the state of mind."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"Junior team members don’t have to talk directly to executives; working effectively with peers can create grassroots buy-in."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"Data entry is the enemy; automation is the key to making research repositories successful."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"Lawyers, though nervous, can become some of the most reasonable people you deal with if you explain risks clearly."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"Data analysts and user researchers rarely work together effectively, which is one of the biggest missed opportunities."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books