Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
Design teams are often faced with lack of research resources that can lead to bottlenecks in execution, an ever growing backlog of research questions or worse releasing products without sufficient research. This can lead to rework and expensive development costs. A rapid research program is a tactical, flexible framework that helps teams build better products by executing on more research faster. This model requires aligning resources to operationalize the process and reduce the overhead and time of standard research processes like recruiting.
Key Insights
-
•
Rapid research is primarily useful for quick, tactical, or evaluative UX design questions that require fast feedback to unblock product decisions.
-
•
Rapid research programs benefit from clear processes, recurring and predictable cadences, and defined roles like moderators, recruiters, and note takers.
-
•
Rapid research is not suited for large, exploratory foundational research questions or scenarios where answers generate more questions without time to iterate.
-
•
Stakeholder support—especially from product teams and designers—is critical for the success and integration of rapid research into product workflows.
-
•
Three common rapid research models are: short and focused (single topic, single moderator), multi moderator (multiple moderators per topic), and multi topic (one moderator covering multiple topics).
-
•
The multi-topic model with one moderator handling several topics per session is effective for scaling across multiple teams and maintaining tight coordination.
-
•
Research operations support, especially in recruiting participants, is essential to running rapid research efficiently at scale.
-
•
Rapid research programs can connect dots across teams by sharing findings, reducing redundant work, and contributing insights to foundational research.
-
•
Documentation and socializing research findings in accessible formats and channels are crucial, especially in fully remote setups.
-
•
Rapid research is a complement—not a replacement—for other UX research methods, enhancing agility but still relying on other types of deeper research.
Notable Quotes
"Rapid research is a flexible framework for quickly executing UX research for fast and often tactical or evaluative design decisions."
"You wanna do rapid research when the feedback or the findings is gonna be focused and impactful."
"Rapid research is really great if you wanna promote research within your organization, but it’s not supposed to be the only thing you do."
"Stakeholder support is pretty important because if people on your team just don’t have time, they’re not gonna be able to commit to their roles."
"Having a predictable cadence makes it way more useful for teams to contribute and benefit from rapid research."
"The advantage of having one moderator is I work with all the teams pretty much and can connect the dots across products."
"Rapid research programs enable designers to submit research questions and feel empowered to participate actively in the research process."
"If rapid research findings create more questions but you don’t have time to address them, it’s probably not the right method."
"We ended up doing an average of five labs per quarter covering 12 to 15 research questions, which helped avoid design delays."
"Rapid research is going quickly; you get a lot of information fast, but the analysis isn’t as deep as other methods."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We have over 140,000 IBMers who’ve completed design thinking online training."
Doug PowellClosing Keynote: Design at Scale
November 8, 2018
"Matching researchers by language and culture makes children more comfortable and improves consent."
Mila Kuznetsova Lucy DentonHow Lessons Learned from Our Youngest Users Can Help Us Evolve our Practices
March 9, 2022
"We created a Wizard of Oz smoke and mirrors prototype—a simple text message thread between a parent and this service—just to get enough buy-in."
Sarah GallimoreInspire Progress with Artifacts from the Future
November 18, 2022
"If your users are happy, that anecdotal feedback often carries more weight early than quantitative metrics."
Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne RogondinoTheme 1: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"It is our job to lead and transform with empathy and heart because there’s fear in everyone."
Alnie FigueroaThe Future of Design Operations: Transforming Our Craft
September 10, 2025
"Mixed methods research, combining qualitative and quantitative, gives the fullest understanding of customer experience."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"I thrive on learning about how people overcome obstacles."
Emily EagleCan't Rewind: Radio and Retail
June 3, 2019
"The curse of hyper-focus means you lose peripheral vision and miss the larger context and customer needs."
Malini RaoLessons Learned from a 4-year Product Re-platforming Journey
June 9, 2021
"Building rapport and rituals helped our remote team foster camaraderie and trust."
Asia HoePartnering with Product: A Journey from Junior to Senior Design
November 29, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can service design improve resilience in AI-powered customer service experiences?
How can inclusive design principles help avoid AI bias and improve machine learning outcomes?
How should service designers adapt their approach when working in different cultural and market contexts, like the US versus Europe?