Rosenverse
Garbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Garbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI

Thursday, January 8, 2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
Garbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI
Speakers: Caroline Jarrett
Link:

Summary

We’re all aware of a big push to implement AI everywhere, including in the services that many of us are working on. It seems only fair to try to give the AI some good quality input in the hope of getting decent output from it.

Or, being more pessimistic: we probably expect to get some level of errors from the AI, but what do we know about the error rates in what we’re putting into the AI?

In this session, we will compare our ideas on identifying errors and measuring error rates, including thinking about errors in six ways:
1) Problems along the way
2) Wrong result
3) Unnecessary action
4) Delayed-impact problem
5) Non-uptake or over-uptake
6) Technology problem
We’ll wrap up with “tips and next steps”: an opportunity to consider what we now need to find out or do differently.

Key Insights

  • •

    Errors in data collection and user input are foundational issues that compromise AI and service outcomes.

  • •

    Users often 'fudge' answers due to ambiguous questions, privacy concerns, or to achieve a desired outcome.

  • •

    Non-uptake, where users abandon a form or process, is a major source of error but is rarely published or measured.

  • •

    Mistakes can be categorized as problems along the way, wrong results, unnecessary actions, and delayed impact issues.

  • •

    Multiple accounts creation often occurs due to users forgetting existing accounts, leading to data duplicates and service inefficiencies.

  • •

    Measuring error rates is complex; different metrics (per person, per attempt, completion vs. start) yield different perspectives.

  • •

    Elections provide a useful model for measuring data quality, using turnout, participation, and eligibility rates.

  • •

    Data quality deteriorates over time due to changes like moving, name changes, loss of documents, or organizational restructuring.

  • •

    AI initiatives can provide a compelling rationale and funding opportunity for improving longstanding data quality problems.

  • •

    Frameworks like the UK Government Data Quality Framework help organizations systematically assess and address data issues.

Notable Quotes

"If we get garbage in, we get garbage out — this is true for AI as much as for surveys or forms."

"People can make all sorts of inventive mistakes on their forms that AI struggles to interpret."

"Sometimes a form forces you into a wrong answer by giving inappropriate options."

"I’ve seen people fudge their date of birth so their child can attend a summer camp they aren’t technically eligible for."

"A major error in many services is users creating multiple accounts because they can’t find or reuse existing ones."

"An error might not be immediate; data can be fine when collected but deteriorate over time and cause problems later."

"Completion rates (conversion rates) and dropout rates are simple metrics but often not tracked or shared."

"Organizations rarely know their error rates, which limits their ability to improve user experience or data accuracy."

"Linking data quality efforts to AI initiatives can help secure attention and budget for necessary improvements."

"Data quality involves accuracy, completeness, uniqueness, timeliness, and representativeness—not just error reduction."

Ask the Rosenbot
Sabrina Mach
How to Design Your Design Operating Model
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Kelly Dern
AI as a Design Partner: How to Get the Most Out of AI Tools to Scale Your Process
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Greg Petroff
The Compass Mission
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Darian Davis
Lessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Laura Schaefer
DesignOps: A Conduit for Inclusion
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Sarah Kinkade
Design Management Models in the Face of Transformation
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Renee Bouwens
Landing Product Impact: Aligning Research as a Foundational Driver for Delivering the World’s Best Products
2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Tricia Wang
The most popular design thinking strategy is BS
2022 • Enterprise Community
Tricia Wang
SCALE: Discussion
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Chris Engledowl
A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust
2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Alnie Figueroa
Teamwork: Strategies for Effective Collaboration with Other Program Management Teams
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Maverick Chan
From Doodle to Demo: AI as Our Storytelling Partner
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Sam Proulx
Understanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Kim Lenox
Leading Distributed Global Teams
2019 • Enterprise Community
Nicole Umphress
Delivering Design Education During a Global Pandemic: Lessons Learned
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"I was talking with a person who said I’m like an idea machine, a 24-7 idea machine. The reply was immediate. It isn’t, you get used up and spat out."

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"There’s been a huge convergence because everybody’s got a mobile device now and expects a certain kind of experience."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"Breaking enterprise into small segments lets you apply research methods effectively at scale."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"One designer's security in a dedicated model may be another designer's stagnation."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"UX should be a critical dependency, not an afterthought or checkbox on the to-do list."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"Junior team members don’t have to talk directly to executives; working effectively with peers can create grassroots buy-in."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"Most organizations don’t have one research tool, but a mix, so openness and integration are essential."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"Nobody loves it when someone from another department shows up to tell people how to do their jobs better."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"Without Jim, what we're going to see today would have been a lot worse."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books