Why Ethics Can't Save Tech
Summary
Key Insights
-
•
Ethical design can address some tech pain points but often fails to prevent systemic harms that occur beyond individual user experiences.
-
•
Systemic harms often emerge after technology deployment and are difficult to detect through standard UX research focused on pain points.
-
•
Many harms in technology contradict core business models, making them controversial and hard to fix through design alone.
-
•
Policy, driven by collective values, complements UX design’s focus on profit and user delight and is essential to mitigate societal harms.
-
•
Designers who understand both user problems and policy landscapes can more effectively advocate for harm reduction through legislation and regulation.
-
•
Cross-sector collaboration between design and policy is still nascent but shows promising examples like regulatory sandboxes in fintech.
-
•
User-centered design methods can and should be incorporated into various stages of the policy cycle to improve policymaking.
-
•
International contexts reveal different relationships between UX, capitalism, and public sector involvement, highlighting the uniqueness of the US tech ecosystem.
-
•
Civil society and consumer voices play a critical role in influencing design and technology policy, often pushing for accessibility and ethical considerations.
-
•
Designers should abandon the savior complex and recognize their influence has limits, encouraging collaborative systemic approaches.
Notable Quotes
"Design ethics can impact some harms of new technology but not all."
"Standard design research looks for pain points, not harms, and harms often cannot be identified in typical user research."
"Many tech harms run counter to business goals and can be controversial to address."
"Policy is ideally driven by values, while UX in the private sector is driven by delight and profit."
"How do we as designers connect more deeply with the policy world? That’s still a developing thing."
"Technology moves faster than policymaking — that’s the pacing problem we need to address."
"User-centered design methods can be used at every stage of policy making, from intention setting to evaluation."
"We should reconsider the savior complex designers sometimes have — we’re not all powerful."
"The future of our technology cannot and should not rest solely on the ethics of individual designers."
"I’m totally freaked out by facial recognition and wonder why we don’t get together as consumers to push back on bad designs."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Creativity fuels design, design fuels innovation."
Dr. Karl JeffriesThe Science of Creativity for DesignOps
January 8, 2024
"Making your chief legal officer your best friend as a designer makes a lot of sense."
Amy MarquezINVEST: Discussion
June 15, 2018
"Enterprise UX is still nascent—businesses worldwide are just beginning to figure out where UX fits."
Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian RohrerDiscussion
May 13, 2015
"Splitting people’s allocation across different teams created work-life balance issues requiring more oversight."
Alicia MootyDesign Staffing Models
September 30, 2021
"I am not throwing away your UX."
Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt LaurenceThe Authentic UX Talent Show
January 8, 2024
"We can’t complain about not having a seat at the table if we don’t offer one of our own."
Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne RogondinoTheme 1: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"Choosing a research repository is a big battle in your organization; the right decisions can really help you succeed."
Sofia QuinteroThe Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ
March 10, 2021
"Nobody loves it when someone from another department shows up to tell people how to do their jobs better."
Laura KleinUnique challenges of innovation in enterprises
April 23, 2020
"Existing research repositories die at the bottom of slide decks; that’s why I started Everywhere to rethink how we manage insights."
Andrew MichaelBuilding a Product Insights Team
March 10, 2022