Rosenverse
[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings

Gold
Wednesday, June 5, 2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Share the love for this talk
[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings
Speakers: Llewyn Paine
Link:

Summary

Under biometric privacy laws like BIPA and CCPA, user research recordings containing users’ faces or voices can put your company at risk for lawsuits and fines. Legal departments are increasingly requiring more stringent redaction, and in some cases banning recording outright. This comes at a high cost for UX teams who are already being asked to do more with less, as losing access to recordings can increase duplicative research effort and reduce the accuracy of results.

AI offers new solutions for UX teams who want to keep research recordings longer without violating biometric privacy laws. In this demo, we’ll show how we used off-the-shelf tools to intelligently redact users’ voices, faces, and bodies in research videos. By removing biometric identifiers, you can compliantly archive research recordings indefinitely, enabling your team to mine them for insights for years to come.

Key Insights

  • •

    Biometric privacy laws increasingly restrict recording and retaining user faces and voices in UX research, risking large fines.

  • •

    Replacing users with AI-generated avatars preserves the richness of user recordings while protecting privacy.

  • •

    Wonder Studio can segment and animate a user's body and face with a 3D avatar fully automatically, simplifying production.

  • •

    11 Labs technology enables seamless voice replacement using AI-generated speech in user research videos.

  • •

    Replacing the entire body, not just the face, mitigates risks from distinctive identifying marks like tattoos and future privacy laws.

  • •

    Traditional redaction methods like blurring or keeping only transcripts are either insufficient or lose valuable context.

  • •

    Current AI tools have usage limits, require legal reviews, and sometimes restrictive licensing affecting enterprise use.

  • •

    Hosting AI models in-house offers more data control but adds technical complexity compared to cloud-based solutions.

  • •

    Using synthetic avatars raises complex ethical questions about authenticity, identity representation, and users' rights to be forgotten.

  • •

    Legal risk tolerance varies, so negotiating with legal teams is essential to implement AI avatar redaction in research workflows.

Notable Quotes

"User recordings are your most valuable asset but have become riskier due to biometric privacy laws."

"Even if you’re not doing facial recognition, storing face and voice data is under growing legal scrutiny."

"Blurring user faces loses context and doesn’t address voice privacy, making it an inadequate solution."

"Wonder Studio automatically segments actors, maps their movements to a 3D model, and renders a synthetic avatar video."

"Replacing the entire body with an avatar future-proofs against unanticipated identifiers like tattoos or moles."

"DeepFakes can look too realistic and might introduce new privacy risks if donor faces come from real people."

"Processing limits and licensing terms currently restrict how much video and audio these AI tools can handle."

"Ultimately, AI avatar tools offer UX teams options to keep recordings while meeting legal compliance."

"If you can’t see a human in a video, how do you know the entire conversation wasn’t fabricated?"

"Synthetic duplicates living on after data deletion raise ethical questions about users’ right to be forgotten."

Ask the Rosenbot
Ellie Krysl
Planned Right. Managed Right. Designed Right.
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Jeff Gothelf
Innovation Studios: the Engines of Enterprise Experimentation
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi
Contextuality problem: Exploring the Benefits of Qualitative and Quantitative Research
2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Laureen Kattan
Centering Patients and Clinicians in a Complex Government Ecosystem
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Jon Fukuda
Coordinating Human-Centered Organizations in the Post-AI Era
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Nicole Wright
Democratizing Research at HoneyBook
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Samuel Proulx
Designing for Disability, Innovating for Everyone
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Saara Kamppari-Miller
Theme Three Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Tricia Wang
SCALE: Discussion
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Soma Ghosh
What emerging methods are advancing UX research [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Robin Beers
Beyond Insights: Researchers as Organizational Change Catalysts
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Changying (Z) Zheng
Practical DesignOps: From Ideas to Tools That Teams Actually Use
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Uday Gajendar
Making the Invisible Visible: The most critical deliverable isn't always the design
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Stephen Pollard
Closing Keynote: Getting giants to dance - what can we learn from designing large and complex public infrastructure?
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Dr. Shruthi Manjula Balakrishna
The Menu Is an Interface: How Print and QR Codes Shape Safety, Trust, and the Dining Experience
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Emily Lessard
RFPs Without Tears: Writing Inclusive RFPS that Don't Scare Away Talent
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"If you value innovation and design, then you're investing in creativity."

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"Show them, don’t tell them — involving stakeholders early builds skin in the game and helps control quality."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"Enterprise UX is still nascent—businesses worldwide are just beginning to figure out where UX fits."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"Agency style staffing allows designers to bring learnings across multiple projects and grow through new challenges."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"I believe there's really no such thing as a boring place at the state of mind."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"Field usability testing showed stakeholders immediately how much value UX can add by catching issues before deployment."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"I didn’t want to be part of that as a founder, hacking attention just to fulfill engagement metrics."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"The incentive structure at a big company is set up to reward people for entirely different stuff than innovation requires."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"Typically, data analytics teams are big and well-funded, while UX research teams are smaller and struggle for resources."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books