Rosenverse
Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You

Gold
Wednesday, December 8, 2021 • Civic Design 2021
Share the love for this talk
Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
Speakers: Sam Proulx
Link:

Summary

In this interactive session, Sam Proulx, accessibility evangelist at Fable, will draw from experience as a person with a disability, and from Fable’s thousands of hours of research experience, to answer all of your questions about conducting prototype reviews with people with disabilities. What design systems work best? What disabilities can participate in prototype reviews out of the box, and what types of disabilities might need special adaptations? What information should a prototype contain, to get the best feedback and engagement from people with disabilities? How can you, within the public sector, learn to better shift left, and involve people with disabilities as early as possible in the design process, and why should you? We’ll also have plenty of time for your own questions! If you’ve been wanting to conduct prototype reviews that involve people with disabilities, but weren’t quite sure where to begin, don’t miss this session!

Key Insights

  • •

    Start accessibility testing with screen magnification users because they can interpret visual prototypes with minimal adaptation.

  • •

    Involving users with physical challenges requires clear indications of hover states, control labels, click target sizes, and may require operating prototypes on their behalf.

  • •

    Screen reader users cannot effectively use typical visual prototypes because they lack semantic markup; alternative prototyping using structured documents is necessary.

  • •

    Accessibility testing should expand in a circle: from screen magnification to physical challenges, then to screen readers.

  • •

    Addressing accessibility issues for one group often benefits other groups, creating a positive cascading effect.

  • •

    Prototypes frequently lack critical information like semantic structure, focus states, keyboard navigation, and alt text needed by screen reader users.

  • •

    Prototyping tools like Webflow support coding prototypes that better simulate real assistive technology environments but require technical expertise.

  • •

    Considering platform differences (Windows, Mac, iOS, Android) is essential as assistive technologies behave differently across them.

  • •

    Excessive white space can hinder usability for screen magnification users by forcing excessive scrolling.

  • •

    Early involvement of people with disabilities in design avoids costly retrofits and leads to more effective accessibility solutions.

Notable Quotes

"The best way to build a fully accessible foundation is to involve the voices of people with disabilities at every step."

"Screen magnification users are low vision and interact visually with prototypes, so little adaptation is needed."

"For users with physical challenges, hover states can be very difficult, especially for eye, head tracking, or voice control users."

"Screen reader users require prototypes that contain semantic information like heading levels, control labels, and landmarks."

"You may need to operate the prototype on behalf of users whose assistive tech can’t click or interact with clickable prototypes."

"Fixing problems found for one disability group often helps fix problems for others too."

"When you magnify prototypes, they may look blurry, but that’s something to fix in the final website design."

"Webflow is an ideal tool for prototypes with code because users can test in the actual browser environment."

"Aim to work with at least one person on each platform your product supports, because assistive tech varies."

"You can create prototypes for screen reader users in Word, Excel, or Google Docs by simulating semantic markup."

Ask the Rosenbot
Kristin Skinner
Opening Keynote: Org Design for Design Orgs
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Sheri Byrne-Haber
The Importance of Accessible Design Systems
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Greg Petroff
Everything is About to Change: Software as Material
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Neema Mahdavi
Operationalizing DesignOps
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Marc Majers
Interrupted UX - Add A Dose of Reality To Usability Testing
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Aaron Stienstra
Leveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Dr. Jamika Burge
Shared Accountability in Enterprise UX
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Carol Scott
Avoid Harming Your Team and Users: Promoting Care and Brand Reputation with Trauma-Informed UX Practices
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Lily Aduana
5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Jemma Ahmed
Convergent Research Techniques in Customer Journey Mapping
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Sarah Fathallah
Beyond insights: Rethinking the role of researchers as stewards of organizational wisdom
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Kevin M. Hoffman
Theme 2: Enterprise Team Journey
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Joseph Williams
Unlocking impact and influence through inclusive hiring in research
2021 • Advancing Research Community
Peter Merholz
The Trials and Tribulations of Directors of UX
2023 • Enterprise Community
Devon Powers
Imagining Better Futures
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Patrick Neeman
Agent Standards Best Viewed in Every Assistant
2026 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"An elite athlete doesn’t turn up at the Olympics and do their thing without coaches, physios, nutritionists."

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"The culture between buyer and user impacts feature adoption and overall satisfaction."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"The weakest insight method might win simply because of the relationship to the power structure."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"It took a lot of relationship building and conversations to break down the perception that designers' time was owned by particular teams."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"With enough creativity and imagination, you can make anything interesting."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"We can’t complain about not having a seat at the table if we don’t offer one of our own."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"Data entry is the enemy; automation is the key to making research repositories successful."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"You are not the first person to try something like this, and they’re typically not looking forward to the next transformation."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"Marketing is an essential collaborator because they help package and communicate insights organization-wide."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books