Summary
Forms are the front door to government services—for everything from getting a job to a COVID-19 vaccine—yet their current design creates systemic barriers for LGBTQ+ people. Forms shape how our government understands, prioritizes, and addresses the needs of its people, but for LGBTQ+ communities, many government forms include demographic questions that are unnecessarily invasive, inadequate, and unclear in their purpose. This deepens mistrust, creates barriers to critical benefits, and prevents collection of data needed to provide effective, equitable services. In this talk, U.S. Digital Service team members will share lessons learned from direct engagement with an intersectional group of LGBTQ+ nonprofit organizations and researchers and statisticians across government and standards organizations as well as an examination of underlying policies and tech systems. We’ll provide a framework for navigating sexual orientation and gender identity, as a first step toward designing equitable forms for all.
Key Insights
-
•
Over 10 times more people from Gen Z identify as LGBTQ+ compared to earlier generations, yet federal forms largely fail to capture this data.
-
•
Current major federal surveys like the American Community Survey cannot identify bisexual or transgender individuals accurately.
-
•
The removal of medical requirements for gender marker changes on U.S. passports marks a historic and affirming policy shift.
-
•
Self-attestation and the introduction of an X gender marker on passports improve visibility and affirm identity in federal ID documents.
-
•
Conducting inclusive user research within tight timelines is difficult but essential to capture intersectional LGBTQ+ voices.
-
•
There is a tension between providing flexible, multi-select options for identity on forms and the challenges these pose for data standardization and statistical analysis.
-
•
The two-step question (sex assigned at birth and current gender identity) is statistically effective but may not be appropriate for all federal forms, especially benefits applications.
-
•
Interoperable backend systems across agencies are crucial to provide a seamless one-government data experience and prevent harm from inconsistent data collection.
-
•
Inclusive, trauma-aware research protocols with centralized reviews ensure safer participation for LGBTQ+ individuals in government research.
-
•
Language evolves quickly; governmental data collection must avoid locking in terminology that may become offensive or outdated.
Notable Quotes
"If you don’t collect data on somebody, they become invisible and nobody should be invisible."
"Government forms need to represent identity and respect privacy so we can better serve all people."
"The LGBTQ+ population is increasing rapidly with each generation, but federal data collection has not kept pace."
"We want to do no harm — collecting sensitive data requires care about how it’s used, shared, and stored."
"Community is not a monolith; we must engage a broad intersection of voices, not just one perspective."
"Change in government moves slowly, but we can pilot and iterate to serve evolving needs more quickly."
"The State Department removed burdensome medical requirements, allowing people to self-attest their gender on passports."
"People use gender and sex interchangeably, but as identities evolve, that creates complications for medical and benefit forms."
"It’s critical that research does not cause distress to participants; trust must be fostered with transparency and safety."
"Users want a one-government experience — they don’t care about separate agencies with different questions or terminology."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The first organization to solve accessibility for new modalities like AR/VR will gain a massive, lasting advantage."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
November 18, 2022
"Flexibility goes both ways: consultants must adapt to the client’s way, but clients must allow consultants to bring new approaches."
Melinda BelcherInsider preview of Enterprise Experience 2020
May 28, 2020
"If you show something that looks ready to ship too early, you may miss exploring 30 other concepts quickly."
Billy CarlsonPrinciples of Team Wireframing
October 2, 2023
"Scaling change starts at the margins and ripples from the periphery into the center of a system."
Hana NagelTurning Research Ripples into Waves
November 8, 2018
"Businesses don’t democratize functions like finance or engineering; why research?"
Ari ZelmanowDark Side of Democratization
October 13, 2023
"There are competing variants in UX adoption like competing virus strains that can slow down change."
Scott PlewesWhy Isn't Your UX Approach Going Viral?: A Mathematical Model
March 28, 2023
"Conway’s law means the way we communicate replicates our organizational structure, creating silos we must resist."
Dominique WardThe Most Exciting Time for DesignOps is Now
September 8, 2022
"Most requests started reactive but evolved into more strategic metric definitions."
Sarah CoyleDesign and Analytics with Sarah Coyle
July 30, 2020
"Market researchers are turning to lean methodologies that feel very close to what user researchers do."
Jemma AhmedConvergent Research Techniques in Customer Journey Mapping
March 31, 2020
