Research Democratization: A Debate
Summary
- Should knowledge be owned or controlled?
- Is research art, science, or craft?
- How much research is too much?
- Can anyone ever not be biased?
- What does it even mean to be a researcher anymore?
Key Insights
-
•
Democratization can inadvertently devalue professional researchers by treating research as merely data collection.
-
•
The true value of research lies in the expertise and strategic insight of researchers, not just in the methods.
-
•
Positioning researchers as senior consultants to the business elevates their role and impact.
-
•
The term 'democratization' carries negative, misleading connotations that hinder productive discussion.
-
•
Non-researchers conducting research face opportunity costs and cognitive load from context switching.
-
•
Training non-researchers is necessary but should be well-governed and distinct from professional training roles.
-
•
Startups may benefit from democratization but need external support to ensure research quality.
-
•
Communicating the business impact of research requires explicitly tying insights to growth, risk, and strategy.
-
•
Research impact is better demonstrated through storytelling and strategic connections than rigid KPIs.
-
•
Advocacy for research leadership in organizations demands raising EQ and OQ alongside traditional research skills.
Notable Quotes
"Democratization is worse than a dumpster fire. It poses an extinction level threat to research as we know it."
"The value of research isn't in the methods or tools, it's in the researcher and the consultative relationship."
"When you go to a physician, you trust their diagnosis and treatment, not just the tests they order."
"Layoffs in research teams are a business-level behavioral indication that research is undervalued."
"Gatekeeping in research is often misunderstood; it’s about preserving quality, not exclusion."
"Democratization has already happened; the conversation should focus on the nuanced middle ground."
"We need to reposition researchers so stakeholders see them as strategic advisors, not just data collectors."
"Good research is an investment; like a good tattoo, you get what you pay for."
"Most research presentations bury recommendations under methods; we must lead with what decisions to make."
"Consensus is the process of abandoning all beliefs in search of something to which no one objects."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The biggest myth of all is you can't teach creativity."
Dr. Karl JeffriesThe Science of Creativity for DesignOps
January 8, 2024
"The culture between buyer and user impacts feature adoption and overall satisfaction."
Amy MarquezINVEST: Discussion
June 15, 2018
"Building an internal research practice is critical for long-term value and integration of insights."
Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian RohrerDiscussion
May 13, 2015
"Involving designers early in the process is crucial to avoid the 'fast-food' model where they feel like order takers."
Alicia MootyDesign Staffing Models
September 30, 2021
"We want to stay in the game no users cursing our name."
Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt LaurenceThe Authentic UX Talent Show
January 8, 2024
"We never compromise on the business goals, but how we achieve them can be flexible and pragmatic."
Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne RogondinoTheme 1: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"Most organizations don’t have one research tool, but a mix, so openness and integration are essential."
Sofia QuinteroThe Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ
March 10, 2021
"Innovation is very much a team sport."
Laura KleinUnique challenges of innovation in enterprises
April 23, 2020
"You’ve got to take control of the backlog and position your team as value-driven, not just servicing individual teams."
Andrew MichaelBuilding a Product Insights Team
March 10, 2022
