Rosenverse
Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes

Gold
Wednesday, March 9, 2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Share the love for this talk
Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes
Speakers: Victor Udoewa
Link:

Summary

Have you ever been a part of a participatory research process or the use of a participatory method only to find that it fell short of any real shift of power dynamics? Have you ever compared notes with another participatory design researcher only to find out their definition of participatory research and design is different than your own? Have you faced opposition from your organization in practicing research in a more participatory way? What does research even mean, what is its purpose, and how does research change from community to community, context to context? Based on that, what are the future possibilities of research?

Come, join the conversation, and see what Victor Udoewa has to say about such experiences, the different definitions of participatory research and how participatory research can actually be used to reinforce hierarchies. One way he has found to dismantle that system is to practice radical participatory research. He will share what that means, how it looks, and how you can begin moving in that direction along with a direct challenge to our community of researchers in regards to our own power.

Key Insights

  • •

    Participatory research is an ancient practice predating modern academia, evidenced in traditions like seed braiding in West Africa and shaman apprenticeships worldwide.

  • •

    Conventional participatory research often reinforces power hierarchies by centering professional researchers as facilitators and decision-makers.

  • •

    Radical participatory research requires community members to outnumber researchers, lead all aspects of research, and own the outcomes and narratives.

  • •

    Giving up power, rather than empowering others, is crucial to avoid perpetuating existing hierarchies in research.

  • •

    Embodied experiential knowledge from community members is often more valuable than institutional knowledge and should be prioritized.

  • •

    Radical participatory research embeds trauma-responsive practices more effectively by involving community members with lived experience.

  • •

    Ethical remuneration must consider equity, compensating community members fairly based on their sacrifices, not just equally.

  • •

    Radical participatory research blurs the lines between research and design, emphasizing non-linear co-creation driven by community needs.

  • •

    Systems and futures thinking are more accessible when communities lead, shifting focus from deficit-based to asset-based, desire-driven approaches.

  • •

    Sustainable shifts in power among team members indicate the success of radical participatory research beyond just project outcomes.

Notable Quotes

"When we empower others, we are actually reinforcing the hierarchy we seek to subvert."

"Community members are always participating and always leading, and they may invite professional researchers up to equal participation and equitable co-leadership."

"Cultural and experiential knowledge are greater than institutional knowledge."

"Empathy is an impossibility when there is inherent power imbalance between researcher and participant."

"If the community is truly leading, you shouldn’t have anyone on the research team who doesn’t want to be there."

"The pace of radical participatory research must match the pace of availability, trust, and relationship."

"The community owns the artifacts and outcomes, as well as the narratives around those outcomes."

"There are many ways to compensate people, but it is not your choice—it is theirs."

"Have a majority of the research team members experienced a sustained and sustainable shift in power?"

"When you do radical participatory research, the process becomes an educational one—for researchers and community members alike."

Ask the Rosenbot
Aiyana Bodi
Three Key Climate Initiatives and How You Can Help
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Tiffany Cheng
Designing in a Pandemic: Integrating Speed and Rigor
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Peter Morville
The Architecture of Understanding
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Dan Willis
Filling the Void
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Lin Nie
When Thought-worlds Collide: Collaborating Between Research and Practice
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Andrea Gallagher
The Problem Space
2019 • Advancing Research Community
Prayag Narula
How to Empower Your Designers to Do Good Research – And Why You Want To
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Satyam Kantamneni
Do You Have an Experience Vision?
2023 • Enterprise Community
Nalini P. Kotamraju
An Organizational Story: Salesforce Lightning Design System
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Frances Yllana
Theme 2 Intro
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Catt Small
Craft a Vision that Actually Gets Shipped
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Alan Williams
Designing essential financial services for those in need
2022 • Civic Design Community
Laura Weiss
Turn Down the Heat: 3 Ways to Handle Conflict in the Moment
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Tracy McGoldrick
IBM User Experience Program—The What, Why and How
2021 • Advancing Research Community
Farid Sabitov
Theme Four Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Dr Chloe Sharp
Using Evidence and Collaboration for Setting and Defending Priorities
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"Tech workers in the UK are five times more depressed than the UK average, with stress killing creativity."

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"The culture between buyer and user impacts feature adoption and overall satisfaction."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"When you look at data without training, confirmation bias makes you just find what you already believe."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"Dedicated staffing gives designers deep vertical mastery but limits horizontal experience."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"Puppetry lets you communicate like, I don’t like what you said, how come you said that to me."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"If your users are happy, that anecdotal feedback often carries more weight early than quantitative metrics."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"The legacy of folders and nested structures causes real problems in finding research and scaling repositories."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"Lawyers, though nervous, can become some of the most reasonable people you deal with if you explain risks clearly."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"At Hotcho, we started with a qualitative focus, swung too far into quantitative, and then found a balanced middle ground."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books