Rosenverse
Day 1 Panel

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Day 1 Panel

Gold
Tuesday, June 4, 2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Share the love for this talk
Day 1 Panel
Speakers: Cennydd Bowles , Dan Rosenberg and Lisa Welchman
Link:

Summary

In this panel discussion, Lisa Welchman, Kenneth Bowles, and Dan Rosenberg delved into the evolving role of designers in the age of AI, emphasizing ethical responsibility and the societal impact of design decisions. Kenneth Bowles highlighted the dual nature of responsibility in design—both backward-looking accountability and forward-looking duty—calling for designers to consider not just users but broader social and environmental stakeholders. Dan Rosenberg raised concerns about the ‘faith in the black box’ of AI and the upstream governance needed to prevent harm. The panelists debated the risk of AI commoditizing design roles and disintermediating human judgment. Lisa urged designers to assert agency, understand business deeply, and resist passivity, arguing for bolder engagement with tech’s ethical trajectories. They stressed that human judgment and empathy remain irreplaceable, especially in complex fields like healthcare. The importance of collaboration across silos and anticipatory design to manage AI’s unpredictable error states was also discussed. The panel concluded with encouragement to designers to deepen tech literacy, engage in ethical mitigation early, and shape AI’s future rather than passively accept it.

Key Insights

  • •

    Design responsibility extends beyond users to society, environment, and the profession itself, demanding broader ethical consideration.

  • •

    AI introduces a risk of commoditizing design work, particularly routine interface tasks that AI can automate within 12 to 36 months.

  • •

    Human judgment remains critical and must not be ceded to AI, especially for discriminatory decisions and ethical complexities.

  • •

    Understanding and linking design work to business strategy and value is essential for designers to maintain influence at the C-suite level.

  • •

    Designers have significant agency but must proactively engage with AI technologies to shape their trajectory rather than resist passively.

  • •

    Cross-disciplinary collaboration, especially between designers and data scientists, is necessary but challenged by entrenched organizational silos.

  • •

    Designers should anticipate and design for AI error states, recognizing generative AI’s infinite unpredictability.

  • •

    Techno-determinism is a pervasive risk; designers must challenge the inevitability mindset by actively influencing AI's ethical direction now.

  • •

    Empathy and the embodied human experience are unique human factors that AI may fake but cannot replicate authentically.

  • •

    Elevating UX roles upstream into product strategy and business leadership can help protect against devaluation due to AI automation.

Notable Quotes

"Designers have obligations not just to users but also to society and our own profession."

"We often point fingers at the person making the most money from the mess that designers put through the system."

"Faith in the black box makes me uneasy; as designers, we must care about what happens behind the scenes."

"I don’t think any designers today would hand over judgmental decisions fully to AI."

"If you don’t understand business, you don’t deserve a seat at the C-suite table."

"People remember how you made them feel, and that’s something AI can fake but not truly replicate."

"The risk is that AI will cut designers out of decision making because it’s perceived as cheaper or faster."

"Middle management often blocks collaboration despite desires from people underneath to work together."

"We need to design for the many error states generative AI can produce, however unpredictable."

"Technology does not have a mind of its own; people with power set its trajectory and we can influence that."

Ask the Rosenbot
Frank Duran
Partnership Playbook: Lessons Learned in Effective Partnership
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Clemens Janssen
Efficiently Scaling Research as a Team of One
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Shipra Kayan
Make your research synthesis speedy and more collaborative using a canvas
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Aleksandra Korczynska
Survey Tools
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Nicole Bergstrom
AccessibilityOps: Moving beyond “nice to have”
2024 • DesignOps Community
Nicole Aleong
What UX research can learn from other research practices [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Mark Boulton
Ops without Designers
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Shan Shen
Translating UX Terms into Business Contexts
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Kristin Skinner
Group Activity: A Deep Dive Into Value and Outcomes
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Joel Branch
Humanizing AI: Filling the Gaps with Multi-faceted Research
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Sam Proulx
Designing For Screen Readers: Understanding the Mental Models and Techniques of Real Users
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Holly Cole
Understanding Experiences: When you have to do more than work
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Victor Udoewa
Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Lais de Almeida
Designing Data Services
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Heidi Trost
When AI Becomes the User’s Point Person—and Point of Failure
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Sam Proulx
SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold

More Videos

Dr. Karl Jeffries

"Are you creative? Such a loaded question, isn't it?"

Dr. Karl Jeffries

The Science of Creativity for DesignOps

January 8, 2024

Amy Marquez

"Find your senior executive ally who understands design and go talk to them first — it works."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Steve Portigal

"Breaking enterprise into small segments lets you apply research methods effectively at scale."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Alicia Mooty

"We covered critical design gaps without waiting for headcount allocation or hiring delays."

Alicia Mooty

Design Staffing Models

September 30, 2021

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes

"UX should be a critical dependency, not an afterthought or checkbox on the to-do list."

Ana Maria Montero Barrantes Aditi Dhar Michelle Kaplan Nate Osborne Matt Laurence

The Authentic UX Talent Show

January 8, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"We can’t complain about not having a seat at the table if we don’t offer one of our own."

Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne Rogondino

Theme 1: Discussion

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"Our principle is that whatever we build must help researchers avoid becoming a silo."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Laura Klein

"The incentive structure at a big company is set up to reward people for entirely different stuff than innovation requires."

Laura Klein

Unique challenges of innovation in enterprises

April 23, 2020

Andrew Michael

"Data analysts and user researchers rarely work together effectively, which is one of the biggest missed opportunities."

Andrew Michael

Building a Product Insights Team

March 10, 2022

Latest Books All books