This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist.
Summary
AI-enabled systems that are responsible and human-centered, will be powerful partners to humans. Making systems that people are willing to be responsible for, and that are trustworthy to those using them enables that partnership. Carol will share guidance for operationalizing the work of making responsible human-centered AI systems based on UX research. She will share methods for UX teams to support bias identification, prevent harm, and support human-machine teaming through design of appropriate evidence of system capabilities and integrity through interaction design. Once these dynamic systems are out in the world, critical oversight activities are needed for AI systems to continue to be effective. This session will introduce each of these complex topics and provide references for further exploration of these exciting issues.
Key Insights
-
•
Responsible AI systems require humans to retain ultimate responsibility and control.
-
•
Bias in AI data is inevitable, but awareness and mitigation of harmful bias is crucial.
-
•
Human-machine teaming must be designed with clear responsibilities and transparency.
-
•
AI systems are dynamic and constantly evolving, making continuous oversight essential.
-
•
Speculative exercises like 'What Could Go Wrong' support anticipating harms proactively.
-
•
Calibrated trust in AI means users neither overtrust nor undertrust the system.
-
•
Ethical frameworks such as the Three Q Do No Harm help plan for impact on vulnerable groups.
-
•
Diverse teams improve innovation by being more aware of biases and ethical variation.
-
•
UX practitioners should understand AI concepts to effectively contribute without needing deep technical skills.
-
•
Designing safe AI includes making unsafe actions difficult and safe states easy to maintain.
Notable Quotes
"Responsible systems are systems that keep humans in control."
"Data is a function of our history; it reflects priorities, preferences, and prejudices."
"AI will ensure appropriate human judgment, not replace it."
"We want people to gain calibrated levels of trust, not overtrust or undertrust."
"If the system is not confident, it should transparently communicate that and hand off to humans."
"Ethical design is not superficial; if we don't ask the tough questions, who will?"
"We need to be uncomfortable and get used to asking hard questions about AI."
"Humans are still better at many activities and those strengths should be prioritized."
"Adopting technical ethics gives teams permission to question implications beyond opinions."
"These systems aren’t stable like old software; they change as data and models evolve."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Screen reader users scored significantly lower in usability tests, reflecting the most effort in interpreting content."
Sam ProulxSUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
December 9, 2021
"The biggest bottleneck is the bureaucracy, like the Paperwork Reduction Act, we have to creatively navigate that."
Michael LandEstablishing Design Operations in Government
February 18, 2021
"Going from 100 to 200 people, suddenly product managers started hearing from a dozen people a week with conflicting requests."
Shipra KayanHow we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up
September 30, 2021
"Leadership doesn’t only mean managing; it can be mentoring, product leadership, or technical influence."
Ian SwinsonDesigning and Driving UX Careers
June 8, 2016
"The chief of staff is the bridge between our executive leadership team and the design ops practitioners."
Isaac HeyveldExpand DesignOps Leadership as a Chief of Staff
September 8, 2022
"We categorized all our work into may-do, must-do, and desire-to-do buckets to better allocate our efforts."
Amy EvansHow to Create Change
September 25, 2024
"Super strength is the resilience and endurance to partner and drive strategic impact backed by customer obsession."
Kate Koch Prateek KalliFlex Your Super Powers: When a Design Ops Team Scales to Power CX
September 30, 2021
"The only way to get outside your bubble is to act as if an alternative belief is true and test it."
Dave GrayLiminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
May 14, 2015
"Product teams want quick, grab-and-go research results, but reusable insights are more abstract and take longer to digest."
Matt DuignanAtomizing Research: Trend or Trap
March 30, 2020
