Liminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
Summary
In his talk, Dave Gray uses metaphors like the enterprise elephant and the blind men to describe how different perspectives in an organization create competing realities. Drawing on the concept of the ladder of inference from Chris Argyris, he explains how experiences, attention, theories, judgments, and beliefs form a self-sealing logic that organizations and individuals unconsciously reinforce. Lou Gerstner's story of IBM’s turnaround illustrates the need to see beyond siloed views. Dave emphasizes that beliefs drive behavior and that without understanding underlying beliefs and needs, efforts to change or get buy-in will fail. He shares powerful stories, such as Adrian’s misunderstanding of a team member’s late working hours, illustrating how testing assumptions through conversation helps break false beliefs. Dave highlights the risks of executive isolation using the “monkey tree” metaphor, where information is filtered upward, reinforcing distorted realities. He advocates for empathy and active outreach by leaders to break bubbles through direct engagement with customers and teams. Drawing on examples from Catherine Courage and Alyssa Briggs, he shows how creating safe spaces—via warm tea, cookies, or field trips—can foster trust and openness. Dave stresses the importance of double-loop learning and acting as if alternative beliefs are true as a way to test and shift organizational culture. He concludes with practical advice to assess people’s needs, understand behaviors, and design experiments to validate or revise beliefs, encouraging everyone to break autopilot routines and cultivate curiosity and openness.
Key Insights
-
•
Organizational culture is a self-reinforcing bubble shaped by shared beliefs that filter and distort reality.
-
•
People’s beliefs form through a ladder of inference: from experiences and attention to theories, judgments, and stories.
-
•
People rarely share their true beliefs openly, making understanding underlying needs critical to effect change.
-
•
Self-sealing logic protects existing beliefs by dismissing conflicting information and rationalizing contradictory evidence.
-
•
Senior leaders are especially vulnerable to distorted realities due to filtered information and lack of direct engagement.
-
•
Breaking patterns and assumptions requires curiosity, experimentation, and acting 'as if' alternative beliefs are true.
-
•
Creating safe spaces using simple acts like sharing warm tea or cookies can build trust and surface genuine needs.
-
•
Empathy for others, including leaders, helps support breakthrough out of limiting belief bubbles.
-
•
Small courageous acts, such as breaking dress codes or challenging routines, can build reputations and open new possibilities.
-
•
Double-loop learning—examining and revising underlying beliefs—is needed to overcome resistance and foster real organizational change.
Notable Quotes
"If you do anything with other people, you’re creating culture."
"The enterprise feels like a big elephant; different people touch different parts and argue what it really is."
"Beliefs are habits of action; they are the rules that guide how we decide to act."
"People don’t share their beliefs; you have to search for and understand them to get true buy-in."
"The higher up you are in an organization, the more distorted your reality is likely to be."
"It’s impossible to be angry with a warm cup of tea in your hand."
"The only way to get outside your bubble is to act as if an alternative belief is true and test it."
"Change only happens in the present moment, not the past or future."
"Most enterprises are not emotionally safe places; people can’t just leave emotions at the door."
"You lie to yourself more than anyone else; the lie is that you are completely rational and objective."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We don’t limit applicants by their major or background; it doesn’t matter if they studied physics or marketing."
Victor M. GonzalezPracticing Learners and Learning Practitioners
March 10, 2021
"Changing how we operate and relate to each other is the only thing in our control, regardless of organizational position."
Alla WeinbergHealing Toxic Stress
September 23, 2024
"Performance reviews at HubSpot are ongoing conversations, not one big yearly event."
Libby MaurerTreating Diversity & Inclusion in Hiring as a Design Problem
December 5, 2019
"When design ops comes in hot, it means honest, orchestrated, and timely."
Briana Thomas Christina RodriguezWhen Design Ops Comes in H.O.T. : A Tale of a Transformed Design Org
September 30, 2021
"Previously, IBM designers were inventing their own buttons for every product, which exasperated chaos and inconsistency."
Mitchell BernsteinOrganizing Chaos: How IBM is Defining Design Systems with Sketch for an Ever-Changing AI Landscape
September 29, 2021
"An SOW at LinkedIn takes six to eight weeks, and by then sometimes the project isn’t even relevant anymore."
Jon Temple Kalee Dankner Bruce Falk Lauren GalanterPanel: Stacks, Security, and Stakeholders: The Hidden Work of UXR Tool Procurement
March 12, 2026
"You want to code once and reuse components consistently for better UX; inconsistent skip-to-content links are a classic accessibility failure."
Sheri Byrne-HaberThe Importance of Accessible Design Systems
January 8, 2024
"Meetings don’t exist for decision making but for brainstorming, catching up, and one-on-ones."
Ana FerreiraDesigning Distributed: Leading Doist’s Fully Remote Design Team in Six Countries
January 8, 2024
"We offer a quantitative approach so you can quickly recognize the strengths and weaknesses in a product compared to competitors."
Daniela Magaña Flores Ariane Rahn Jeff Ephraim BanderAhead of Competition: Learn What UX Benchmarking Can Do for Your Business Today
March 10, 2022
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are some signs or 'weak signals' that designers can follow when seeking new career directions?
Why is service design lacking in the solar industry, and how does that affect solar system adoption?
How can creative professionals cope with the tension between AI-generated content and preserving human voice?