Rosenverse
A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust

Friday, April 28, 2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Share the love for this talk
A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust
Speakers: Chris Engledowl
Link:

Summary

Quantitative instruments are frequently sought because 1) they can be quickly fielded to lots and lots of people, and 2) when carefully sampled, they can be generalizable to the population of users/customers. However, because many times the focus is on speed to launch because decision-makers need results quickly, there is not much depth given to their development, nor an investigation of the validity evidence. In the session, I will share a framework that centers validity and is necessarily a mixed methods approach to research. I will also share ideas on how to scale the research over time so that findings and insights are able to be iteratively delivered to stakeholders, while also iteratively informing one another in a qual-quant research dance that brings more trustworthy, user-centered evidence to decision-makers. Finally, I will share ideas for a course I am developing for supporting qualitative researchers to become more mixed in their approach.

Key Insights

  • •

    Validity involves five evidence sources: content, response processes, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences of testing.

  • •

    Qualitative methods, especially cognitive interviews, are crucial for understanding how respondents interpret survey items, supporting validity.

  • •

    Surveys should be treated as products that need ongoing iteration and testing, not one-off tools.

  • •

    Ethical considerations extend beyond data privacy to how survey results affect user experience and product decisions.

  • •

    Mixed methods approaches leverage both qualitative insights and quantitative analyses to build a stronger validity argument.

  • •

    Breaking down survey validation work across multiple teams and 'bite-sized' efforts makes the process manageable.

  • •

    Revising surveys over time to improve validity complicates measuring change longitudinally but increases trustworthiness.

  • •

    Stakeholder buy-in improves when validity processes are communicated as phased insights offering tangible results quickly.

  • •

    Analyses such as factor analysis and Rasch modeling reveal survey internal structure and help identify item bias across subpopulations.

  • •

    It is important to revisit validity considerations continuously, especially after product or user base changes.

Notable Quotes

"Validity is the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores for proposed uses."

"Qualitative research in a mixed methods setting needs to think about validity to support the bigger validity argument."

"What would happen if you do think about validity? Would it change your process or research plans?"

"Surveys are products too, so they need to be iteratively tested."

"You don’t know what you don’t know. Let’s write surveys that cover those blind spots."

"If the survey wording changes, measuring change over time becomes difficult, but improving the survey builds trust."

"Ethical considerations should go beyond typical privacy reviews and think deeply about user impact throughout the process."

"It is better to partner with someone who has quantitative expertise to interpret internal structure analyses."

"Management and stakeholders often care more about getting usable information quickly than understanding the full validity process."

"We can get quick insights in phases to keep teams engaged and slowly build a complete validity argument."

Ask the Rosenbot
Jacqui Frey
Setting the Table for Dynamic Change
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Meaghan Waters
Lack of Product Thinking will Doom Your Legacy Modernization
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Mujtaba Hameed
The new horizon of ethnography: using AI to unlock the full potential of in-person research
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Joerg Beringer
Scaling User Research with AI: Continuous Discovery of User Needs in Minutes
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Peter Merholz
The Mysterious Case of the Missing UX Career Path
2022 • DesignOps Community
Savina Hawkins
Harnessing AI in UXR: Practical Strategies for Positive Impact
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Jeff Sussna
What DesignOps Can Learn From DevOps
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Kim Lenox
Leading Distributed Global Teams
2019 • Enterprise Community
Mackenzie Guinon
M.C. Escher’s UX Research Career Ladder
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Jon Fukuda
Theme One Intro
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Shelby Switzer
Making Space for Community Knowledge-sharing in a Distributed World
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Stefanie Hutka
Shaping the Tools that Shape Us
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Vanessa Varin
Feedback: The Other F-Word
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Kristin Skinner
Five Years of DesignOps
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Laura Gatewood
Beyond Buzzwords: Adding Heart to Effective Slack Communication
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Candi Williams
Unpacking Uncomfortable Truths
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference

More Videos

Corey Long

"Being humble enough to ask a competitor for feedback changed everything and led directly to job offers."

Corey Long

Hiring in DesignOps: A Critical Study on How to Hire and Get Hired

September 23, 2024

Sarah Auslander

"Pay transparency within organizations is critical for enabling good work and healthier working conditions."

Sarah Auslander Betsy Ramaccia Gordon Ross

Insights Panel

November 18, 2022

Lisa Welchman

"Human biases are the real problem behind algorithmic bias because organizations embed those biases first."

Lisa Welchman

Cleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers

June 14, 2018

Lena Shenkarenko

"We must create spaces that allow nature to thrive within our cities."

Lena Shenkarenko

Collaborative Wireframing for Creating Team Alignment and Shipping Better Products

October 21, 2020

Christian Bason

"We have to design not just for humans but for other life forms on this planet."

Christian Bason

Expand—Rethinking Design for Public Challenges

September 14, 2022

Nicole Umphress

"Social opportunities to connect with each other actually offset the remote fatigue and isolation that many were feeling."

Nicole Umphress

Delivering Design Education During a Global Pandemic: Lessons Learned

June 9, 2022

Jim Kalbach

"Empathy in jazz means the band is in it together—when someone plays a wrong chord, the rest adapt and turn it into an opportunity."

Jim Kalbach

Jazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration

November 6, 2017

Bob Baxley

"Building relationships with our internal partners may well be the highest leverage aspect of our jobs."

Bob Baxley

Theme 4: Intro

January 8, 2024

Megan Campos

"If seeing a diverse participant pool is important to you, it's your responsibility to make sure your recruiters use it as a priority."

Megan Campos

What Did I Miss? The Hidden Costs of Deprioritizing Diversity in User Research

March 12, 2021

Latest Books All books