Rosenverse
Atomizing Research: Trend or Trap

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Atomizing Research: Trend or Trap

Gold
Monday, March 30, 2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Share the love for this talk
Atomizing Research: Trend or Trap
Speakers: Matt Duignan
Link:

Summary

There has been an explosion of interest in atomizing research, where researchers stop writing reports and instead tag individual insights in a database. The theory is that this will unlock your insights, making them findable and reusable. But does it work, and should you be doing the same? At Microsoft we tried it: Five years, 40,000 insights, 20+ research teams, and 17,000 unique users. So what have we learnt? We learnt that a structured insight library can be worth the effort. But we also learnt that atomizing insight can be taken too far. We learnt that context is critical. We learnt that short term efficiency is king, and that the required culture change is hard. And through this journey we’ve begun to discover how to blend atomized insight with your traditional research process.

Key Insights

  • •

    Traditional research repositories often become burial grounds for insights, making it hard to find or connect reusable knowledge.

  • •

    Shifting to atomic research focuses on individual insights as the fundamental unit rather than entire reports, enabling search, link, and remix.

  • •

    Microsoft’s HITS system tracks dozens of thousands of insights connected across products like Windows, Xbox, and HoloLens.

  • •

    Creating durable, reusable research insights requires overcoming strong human cognitive biases like hyperbolic discounting and in-group favoritism.

  • •

    A culture of continuous curation and managerial priority is essential but challenging to maintain over time.

  • •

    Immediate tactical value is key to motivating researchers to contribute to reusable knowledge rather than only producing one-off reports.

  • •

    Allowing insights to emerge organically by observing reference patterns reduces complexity compared to rigid categorization of durable vs. raw observations.

  • •

    Researchers and product teams benefit greatly from direct linking to specific insights and underlying evidence within their day-to-day workflows.

  • •

    Handling conflicting insights involves encouraging researchers to collaborate and rationalize perspectives through syntheses rather than top-down arbitration.

  • •

    The just-in-time curation approach folds creation and connection of reusable insights into immediate research tasks, reducing friction and cognitive load.

Notable Quotes

"Repository to me has a connotation of a place where stuff goes to sit and collect dust."

"What if the atomic unit of research wasn’t the reports, but it was the insight within those reports?"

"We wanted a living network of knowledge so yesterday’s insight connects to today’s evidence and tomorrow’s learning."

"Curation is super important, but also super hard."

"You have to push against 200,000 years of human evolution to get researchers to create reusable knowledge."

"Product teams want quick, grab-and-go research results, but reusable insights are more abstract and take longer to digest."

"Providing immediate tactical value is the big one for just-in-time curation."

"Standalone insights destroy the researcher’s ability to storytelling and engagement."

"Durable insights can emerge organically based on usage and referencing patterns in the system."

"The challenge is whether your organization has the energy to overcome cultural and technical barriers driving researchers back to disposable knowledge."

Ask the Rosenbot
Tala Tayebi
Voice and influence in an age of noise
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Matteo Gratton
Can Data and Ethics Live Together?
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Dave Hoffer
UX Job Search AMA #3 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Tristin Oldani
Turning awareness into action with Climate UX
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group
Robin Cannon
AI means your design system can't suck anymore
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Weidan Li
Qualitative synthesis with ChatGPT: Better or worse than human intelligence?
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Neil Barrie
Widening the Aperture: The Case for Taking a Broader Lens to the Dialogue between Products and Culture
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Scott Jensen
Short Take #2: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Wyatt Hayman
Global Research Panels
2020 • DesignOps Community
Steve Portigal
War Stories LIVE! Steve Portigal
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Maria Rosala
AI-Assisted Qualitative Analysis: What to Automate and What to Own
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Josh Clark
Sentient Design: New Design Patterns for New Experiences (3rd of 3 seminars)
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Jeff Sussna
What DesignOps Can Learn From DevOps
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Darian Davis
Lessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Andy Polaine
What is the role of service design in product-led organizations?
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Cornelius Rachieru
Handling Complexity: Framing a Scale of Design
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold

More Videos

Ebru Namaldi

"Tomorrow of design ops belongs to those who lead with foresight into designs and designers future, to stay human and resilient."

Ebru Namaldi

Designing the Designer’s Journey: Scaling Teams, Culture, and Growth Through DesignOps

September 11, 2025

Samuel Proulx

"Complexity is not a barrier to accessibility; even complicated games like The Last of Us are accessible."

Samuel Proulx

Invisible barriers: Why accessible service design can’t be an afterthought

December 3, 2024

Kristin Skinner

"You can’t have effective teams without happy designers and better designers; they’re interdependent."

Kristin Skinner Kamdyn Moore

Group Activity: A Deep Dive Into Value and Outcomes

October 23, 2019

Jon Fukuda

"Each team should talk about their core values like integrity, accountability, and respect to work together with the same mindset."

Jon Fukuda Amy Evans Ignacio Martinez Joe Meersman

The Big Question about Innovation: A Panel Discussion

September 25, 2024

Smitha Papolu

"Organize synthesis before the research happens by aligning on themes and goals with moderators and track leads."

Smitha Papolu Nova Wehman-Brown Melissa Schmidt Adam Menter

Theme 3 Discussion

June 4, 2019

Ellen Chisa

"Sometimes the tension comes from conflicts in how we think about our values and how we think about value."

Ellen Chisa

The Values of Design

November 29, 2023

Zariah Cameron

"Lived experiences like poverty or homelessness bring a richer, deeper lens than a textbook study ever could."

Zariah Cameron

Streamlining an Inclusive Design Practice

October 3, 2023

Saara Kamppari-Miller

"When we start being intentional about inclusion, we gain clarity in Design Ops."

Saara Kamppari-Miller

Theme Three Intro

September 9, 2022

Michelle Chin

"Design ops is a lot of change management, and asking people to change again requires appreciation and celebrating wins."

Michelle Chin

The DesignOps Starter Kit

September 29, 2021