Summary
Did you know that the SUS creates biases in your research, affecting one in five people? That’s right! People with disabilities, especially those who use assistive technology, are not considered by most of the questions in the SUS. As a designer for the public sector, this could lead to you making design decisions that don’t take into account 20 percent of the visitors to your website.
Key Insights
-
•
Screen readers allow users to navigate web pages quickly by jumping through well-structured headings and content.
-
•
Low vision users often rely on system-wide screen magnification and color inversion settings to reduce eye strain.
-
•
Alternative navigation methods like head mice and voice dictation are selected based on task and user condition, not used exclusively.
-
•
Traditional lab-based usability research often prioritizes convenience over real assistive technology configurations, leading to inaccurate results.
-
•
Assistive technology users rarely use default settings; they extensively customize tools over time for optimal use.
-
•
The System Usability Scale (SUS) includes questions that confuse assistive technology users and do not capture their true experience.
-
•
Fable’s Accessible Usability Scale adapts SUS questions to better reflect the experience of assistive technology users.
-
•
Initial data shows screen reader users report significantly lower usability scores (mid-50s) compared to screen magnification users (low 60s).
-
•
Users’ lowered expectations after years of experience may mask the true severity of usability issues in assistive technology contexts.
-
•
Measuring accessibility usability accurately enables benchmarking and progress in improving digital products for all users.
Notable Quotes
"I’ve been using screen readers for 30 years and accessibility has always been a passion of mine."
"Screen readers let us jump from one heading to another, replicating the experience of skimming a page visually."
"Low vision users often invert colors and use magnification levels as high as 400 percent to reduce eye strain."
"Alternative navigation users pick different tools based on the task and how they feel at that moment, not just one technology."
"In a usability session, the biggest challenge is not to talk at the same time the screen reader is talking."
"No assistive technology user uses default settings; we spend years customizing everything to work for us."
"The System Usability Scale’s question about needing a technical person to use the system is confusing and inaccurate for screen reader users."
"Most people with my assistive technology might learn to use the system at a different pace than non-disabled users."
"Screen reader users scored significantly lower in usability tests, reflecting the most effort in interpreting content."
"If you’re doing research with people with disabilities, consider using the Accessible Usability Scale to get more accurate insights."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Taking responsibility for our behaviors starts with an apology and continues with regular feedback and action."
Darian DavisLessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
January 8, 2024
"Iterative engagement models mean we test, learn, and adapt rather than seeking a perfect solution from the start."
Aaron Stienstra Lashanda HodgeLeveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government
December 8, 2021
"Assistive technology can feel like another person in the room during a research session, which you have to understand and include."
Kavana RameshMeaningful inclusion: Practicing accessibility research with confidence
September 24, 2024
"Building skepticism into users is essential because if you’re not skeptical as a designer, it’s hard to build it into your customers."
Helen ArmstrongAugment the Human. Interrogate the System.
June 7, 2023
"More math is coming our way into research into UX."
Scott PlewesWhy Isn't Your UX Approach Going Viral?: A Mathematical Model
March 28, 2023
"Design thinking is really just a set of methodologies; there’s really no thinking in design thinking."
Christian BasonExpand—Rethinking Design for Public Challenges
September 14, 2022
"Context design and context engineering mean figuring out and building what needs to go into that text file sent to the model."
Peter Van DijckBuilding impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 3: Understand AI architectures: RAG, Agents, Oh My!
July 30, 2025
"AI doesn’t have a body or sensory experience, so it can’t replace human contextual understanding in research."
Soma Ghosh Savina Hawkins Dave Hoffer Rob Thomas Victor UdoewaWhat emerging methods are advancing UX research [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
September 28, 2023
"You have to deliberately quiet that noise in your head and focus on humans in a world of humans."
Steve Portigal Susan Simon-Daniels Tamara Hale Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Q&A-Discussion
March 30, 2020
