Summary
Did you know that the SUS creates biases in your research, affecting one in five people? That’s right! People with disabilities, especially those who use assistive technology, are not considered by most of the questions in the SUS. As a designer for the public sector, this could lead to you making design decisions that don’t take into account 20 percent of the visitors to your website.
Key Insights
-
•
Inclusive design practices enhance product usability for everyone.
-
•
Assistive technologies include screen readers, screen magnifiers, and alternative navigation tools.
-
•
Screen reader users face unique challenges that often lead to lower usability scores.
-
•
Traditional usability research methods may not effectively capture the experiences of assistive technology users.
-
•
Custom configurations of assistive technologies are essential for their effective use.
-
•
Accessibility and usability are interconnected; improving one often enhances the other.
-
•
The Accessible Usability Scale offers a more suitable measurement tool for assistive tech usability.
-
•
Collaborative research with assistive technology users leads to better product outcomes.
-
•
Normative data shows significant usability gaps for screen reader users compared to other categories.
-
•
Continual data collection is necessary to benchmark accessibility improvements.
Notable Quotes
"Accessibility and usability for people with disabilities is something that I've always been passionate about."
"As a screen reader user, I need to navigate by heading levels to quickly skim a web page."
"The best way to avoid confusion during research is to break tasks into small chunks."
"The Accessible Usability Scale is an invitation for teams to critically evaluate usability with assistive tech users."
"The System Usability Scale does not effectively capture the real-world experiences of assistive technology users."
"It's surprising that screen reader users score significantly lower on usability scales than expected."
"Customization of assistive technologies is a necessity; out-of-the-box settings usually don't reflect personal needs."
"Tasks often take longer if assistive tech users are unfamiliar with testing environments."
"We're excited to support research and improvements that bridge usability for assistive technology users."
"Feel free to evaluate or modify the Accessible Usability Scale; we welcome collaborative efforts."
More Videos
"Money is not an evil thing."
John MaedaMaking Sense of Enterprise UX
June 9, 2016
"Thinking styles are not horoscopes, they're not universal things."
Indi YoungThinking styles: Mend hidden cracks in your market
January 8, 2025
"Rapid experimentation leads to insights, which in turn fuel innovation."
Chris ChapoData Science and Design: A Tale of Two Tribes
May 13, 2015
"Material design is a framework for creating web and mobile experiences."
Elizabeth ChurchillExploring Cadence: You, Your Team, and Your Enterprise
June 8, 2017
"We truly believe that when all of us win together, we can achieve so much more."
Rusha SopariwalaRemote, Together: Craft and Collaboration Across Disciplines, Borders, Time Zones, and a Design Org of 170+
June 9, 2022
"Human-centered design makes you feel like we're centering on humans, but that is not always true."
George AyeThat Quiet Little Voice: When Design and Ethics Collide
November 16, 2022
"Creating space for us to name the things we were experiencing allows us to unload some emotional weight."
Ariba JahanTeam Resiliency Through a Pandemic
January 8, 2024
"Being a design educator rather than just a designer helps teams collaborate effectively."
Julie Gitlin Esther RaiceDesign as an Agent of Digital Transformation at JPMC
June 9, 2021
"Data per se are not the problem; it's the way we are using the data that can be problematic."
Matteo GrattonCan Data and Ethics Live Together?
October 1, 2021
