Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

A Typology of Participation in Participatory Research
Gold
Tuesday, March 28, 2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Share the love for this talk
A Typology of Participation in Participatory Research
Speakers: Sarah Fathallah
Link:

Summary

This talk aims to unpack the notion of participation used in participatory design research, by proposing a framework through which different levels of participation can occur at different stages of the research process. Drawing examples of work in child welfare and foster care, this framework is ultimately an invitation to challenge the notion that participation is binary (i.e., either research is participatory or isn't) or fixed (i.e., there is only one way participation can be done). Instead, participation is a negotiation that should take into account different factors (e.g., partners, resources, timeline), and could include a combination of different levels at different stages in any given research study.

Key Insights

  • Participation in research should be viewed as a continuum across different stages and degrees, not a binary or single ladder.

  • Arnstein's ladder of participation, while influential, oversimplifies participation by focusing mainly on power transfer and neglecting safety, well-being, and other goals.

  • The spiral model of participatory action research adds a temporal dimension emphasizing ongoing reflection and participant feedback throughout the project.

  • Meaningful participation requires more than just involving people; it demands trauma-responsiveness, safety, mutuality, compensation, and avoiding tokenism.

  • Mapping degrees and sites of participation creates diverse assemblies unique to each research project, highlighting complexity and flexibility.

  • Involving people with lived experience as research team members enhances study design, recruitment, data interpretation, and dissemination.

  • External academic peer review can exert power that conflicts with participatory research goals, so forming a lived expert review board can rebalance power.

  • Metrics quantifying the quantity of participation (e.g., number of sessions or participants) risk misrepresenting the quality and ethics of engagement.

  • Longitudinal research with foster youth faces ethical and practical challenges, especially around consent and developmental readiness, often limiting study scope.

  • Participation should be considered an ethical commitment, but it must be complemented by care ethics and trauma-informed practices to avoid harm.

Notable Quotes

"Youth, families, and communities impacted by the child welfare system experience a lot of loss of control, with important aspects of their lives decided without their input."

"Participation is one way to minimize loss of control and allow people to exercise their agency and autonomy."

"Arnstein’s ladder reduces participation to delegating decision-making power, ignoring goals like safety, well-being, and satisfaction."

"The spiral model introduces temporality—constantly going back to participants to confirm outcomes align with goals."

"Instead of asking if research is participatory or not, we should ask when and how participatory the research is."

"Participatory research doesn’t inherently prevent harm or power differentials; it just engages more people in the process."

"Just because you do more sessions or add review moments doesn’t mean the quality of engagement improves."

"We formed a lived expert review board to support framing conclusions and decisions, rebalancing power from academic peer reviewers."

"Many ethical and practical issues prevent us from conducting longitudinal research with children under 18 in foster care."

"Participation is an ethical commitment but should be complemented by an ethic of care, valuing people’s time and being trauma responsive."

Ask the Rosenbot
Russell Blair
Killing the blank page
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
John Mortimer
Panel Discussion
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Rebecca Buck
Mission: Keep Talent in Research Roles!
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Etienne Fang
The Power of Care: From Human-Centered Research to Humanity-Centered Leadership
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Kritika Yadav
Optimizing AI Conversations: A Case Study on Personalized Shopping Assistance Frameworks
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi
Contextuality problem: Exploring the Benefits of Qualitative and Quantitative Research
2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Isaac Heyveld
Expand DesignOps Leadership as a Chief of Staff
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Discussion
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Melinda Belcher
Bridging the Gap: Making the Most of the Differences Between Agency and Enterprise
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Christopher Taylor Edwards
Design as a Team Practice, A Practical Guide to Cross-functional Collaboration
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Jules Monza
Use These Words and Count These Things
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Bud Caddell
Theme 2 Intro
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Aurobinda Pradhan
Introduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Rebecca Topps
Planning and conducting remote usability studies for accessibility
2020 • Advancing Research Community
Julie Baher
Culture Change—My Journey
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Dave Hoffer
UX Job Search AMA #2 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
2025 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Bria Alexander

"If you have problems with Slack or the conference experience, please contact the help desk customer service."

Bria Alexander

Opening Remarks

November 18, 2022

Hugh Dubberly

"Small companies like Descartes Labs built supercomputers entirely in AWS with no physical servers, showing a profound shift in how computing power is accessed."

Hugh Dubberly

Problems with Problems: Reconsidering the Frame of Designing as Problem-Solving

June 19, 2019

April Reagan

"Foresight is a team sport—the more perspectives you have, the better your future scenarios become."

April Reagan

Look, Think, Act: The Futures-Smart Design Organization

October 1, 2021

Ricardo Martins

"Cluster analysis is very useful if you want to avoid a one-size-fits-all approach to product or service design."

Ricardo Martins

Unlocking the power of advanced quantitative methods

March 12, 2025

Maria Skaaden

"Giving the whole team access to feedback made them feel responsible and inspired to solve user needs."

Maria Skaaden

Continuous Design: One eye on the horizon and the other on the next wave

November 8, 2018

Vanessa Varin

"Feedback is a lot like holding up a mirror. You're reflecting what's already working and like using a flashlight to hide in the corners."

Vanessa Varin

Feedback: The Other F-Word

September 10, 2025

Jen Crim

"Embrace diversity and create belonging means everyone feels they truly belong, not just fit in."

Jen Crim Jess Quittner Saritha Kattekola Alex Karr Gurbani Pahwa

Culture, DIBS & Recruiting

June 11, 2021

Patrick Boehler

"Structure beats free form interaction—systematic query frameworks are essential to avoid pitfalls."

Patrick Boehler

Fishing for Real Needs: Reimagining Journalism Needs with AI

June 10, 2025

Julie Baher

"We reached about half of Citrix’s 10,000 employees worldwide through workshops and education."

Julie Baher

Culture Change—My Journey

May 14, 2015