Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

A Typology of Participation in Participatory Research
Gold
Tuesday, March 28, 2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Share the love for this talk
A Typology of Participation in Participatory Research
Speakers: Sarah Fathallah
Link:

Summary

This talk aims to unpack the notion of participation used in participatory design research, by proposing a framework through which different levels of participation can occur at different stages of the research process. Drawing examples of work in child welfare and foster care, this framework is ultimately an invitation to challenge the notion that participation is binary (i.e., either research is participatory or isn't) or fixed (i.e., there is only one way participation can be done). Instead, participation is a negotiation that should take into account different factors (e.g., partners, resources, timeline), and could include a combination of different levels at different stages in any given research study.

Key Insights

  • Participation in research should be viewed as a continuum across different stages and degrees, not a binary or single ladder.

  • Arnstein's ladder of participation, while influential, oversimplifies participation by focusing mainly on power transfer and neglecting safety, well-being, and other goals.

  • The spiral model of participatory action research adds a temporal dimension emphasizing ongoing reflection and participant feedback throughout the project.

  • Meaningful participation requires more than just involving people; it demands trauma-responsiveness, safety, mutuality, compensation, and avoiding tokenism.

  • Mapping degrees and sites of participation creates diverse assemblies unique to each research project, highlighting complexity and flexibility.

  • Involving people with lived experience as research team members enhances study design, recruitment, data interpretation, and dissemination.

  • External academic peer review can exert power that conflicts with participatory research goals, so forming a lived expert review board can rebalance power.

  • Metrics quantifying the quantity of participation (e.g., number of sessions or participants) risk misrepresenting the quality and ethics of engagement.

  • Longitudinal research with foster youth faces ethical and practical challenges, especially around consent and developmental readiness, often limiting study scope.

  • Participation should be considered an ethical commitment, but it must be complemented by care ethics and trauma-informed practices to avoid harm.

Notable Quotes

"Youth, families, and communities impacted by the child welfare system experience a lot of loss of control, with important aspects of their lives decided without their input."

"Participation is one way to minimize loss of control and allow people to exercise their agency and autonomy."

"Arnstein’s ladder reduces participation to delegating decision-making power, ignoring goals like safety, well-being, and satisfaction."

"The spiral model introduces temporality—constantly going back to participants to confirm outcomes align with goals."

"Instead of asking if research is participatory or not, we should ask when and how participatory the research is."

"Participatory research doesn’t inherently prevent harm or power differentials; it just engages more people in the process."

"Just because you do more sessions or add review moments doesn’t mean the quality of engagement improves."

"We formed a lived expert review board to support framing conclusions and decisions, rebalancing power from academic peer reviewers."

"Many ethical and practical issues prevent us from conducting longitudinal research with children under 18 in foster care."

"Participation is an ethical commitment but should be complemented by an ethic of care, valuing people’s time and being trauma responsive."

Ask the Rosenbot
Aurobinda Pradhan
Introduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Anupama Dhareshwar
From blueprint to bot: Designing resilient AI-powered services
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold
Bria Alexander
Day 3 Welcome
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Rebecca Buck
Mission: Keep Talent in Research Roles!
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Peter Merholz
The Trials and Tribulations of Directors of UX
2023 • Enterprise Community
Mike Oren
Improving Democratized Research with CustomGPTs and Gems
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Prabhas Pokharel
Order and Chaos: New Ways of Collaborating on Synthesis and Storytelling
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Jennifer Strickland
Fireside Chat: How Design Addresses a World on Fire
2022 • Civic Design Community
Courtney Maya George
Scale Your Organization and Grow Your Designers
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Matt Webb
Context Window: Five Futures for AI
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Dave Gray
Liminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Jonathon Colman
How to Maximize the Impact of Content Design
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Benjamin Wiedmaier
Redefining Toolkits: Unbundling to Create a Perfect Match
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Yulya Besplemennova
[Demo] Stress-testing GenAI in user research synthesis
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Milan Guenther
A Shared Language for Co-Creating Ambitious Endeavours
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Uday Gajendar
Theme One Intro
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold

More Videos

Daniel Gloyd

"The epidemic of isolation is tied to digital design that creates connectivity without connection."

Daniel Gloyd

Designing Warmth

February 26, 2025

Steve Portigal

"The core of it is really putting yourself in that other person’s shoes—it’s basic but essential empathy."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Harry Max

"The last thing you want to do is get it right and end up with it being wrong."

Harry Max Jim Meyer

Prioritization for Leaders (2nd of 3 seminars)

June 27, 2024

Brigette Metzler

"Lifting your game above the day to day is impossible without ops."

Brigette Metzler

Scaling ResearchOps: Helping Researchers do Their Best Work

March 30, 2020

Jennifer Kanyamibwa

"If you really want to build culture and see how people cross collaborate, try to make lunch with your entire team every single week."

Jennifer Kanyamibwa

Creating the Blueprint: Growing and Building Design Teams

November 8, 2018

Emilia Åström

"Good collaboration design helps teams solve problems and connect at the same time."

Emilia Åström Jim Kalbach

Unlock Your Team’s Intelligence with Collaboration Design

June 9, 2022

Christian Rohrer

"Every great user experience begins with meeting a user need at its very core."

Christian Rohrer

Insight Types That Influence Enterprise Decision Makers

May 13, 2015

George Zhang

"Recognition programs help create a happy, inclusive, and high-performing global team focused on impact."

George Zhang Molly Stevens

UX Research Excellence Framework

March 11, 2021

Bria Alexander

"Sponsor sessions are free for anyone, whether you paid to attend or not, so invite your coworkers, friends, and family."

Bria Alexander

Opening Remarks

September 30, 2021