Rosenverse
A Typology of Participation in Participatory Research

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

A Typology of Participation in Participatory Research

Gold
Tuesday, March 28, 2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Share the love for this talk
A Typology of Participation in Participatory Research
Speakers: Sarah Fathallah
Link:

Summary

This talk aims to unpack the notion of participation used in participatory design research, by proposing a framework through which different levels of participation can occur at different stages of the research process. Drawing examples of work in child welfare and foster care, this framework is ultimately an invitation to challenge the notion that participation is binary (i.e., either research is participatory or isn't) or fixed (i.e., there is only one way participation can be done). Instead, participation is a negotiation that should take into account different factors (e.g., partners, resources, timeline), and could include a combination of different levels at different stages in any given research study.

Key Insights

  • Participation in research should be viewed as a continuum across different stages and degrees, not a binary or single ladder.

  • Arnstein's ladder of participation, while influential, oversimplifies participation by focusing mainly on power transfer and neglecting safety, well-being, and other goals.

  • The spiral model of participatory action research adds a temporal dimension emphasizing ongoing reflection and participant feedback throughout the project.

  • Meaningful participation requires more than just involving people; it demands trauma-responsiveness, safety, mutuality, compensation, and avoiding tokenism.

  • Mapping degrees and sites of participation creates diverse assemblies unique to each research project, highlighting complexity and flexibility.

  • Involving people with lived experience as research team members enhances study design, recruitment, data interpretation, and dissemination.

  • External academic peer review can exert power that conflicts with participatory research goals, so forming a lived expert review board can rebalance power.

  • Metrics quantifying the quantity of participation (e.g., number of sessions or participants) risk misrepresenting the quality and ethics of engagement.

  • Longitudinal research with foster youth faces ethical and practical challenges, especially around consent and developmental readiness, often limiting study scope.

  • Participation should be considered an ethical commitment, but it must be complemented by care ethics and trauma-informed practices to avoid harm.

Notable Quotes

"Youth, families, and communities impacted by the child welfare system experience a lot of loss of control, with important aspects of their lives decided without their input."

"Participation is one way to minimize loss of control and allow people to exercise their agency and autonomy."

"Arnstein’s ladder reduces participation to delegating decision-making power, ignoring goals like safety, well-being, and satisfaction."

"The spiral model introduces temporality—constantly going back to participants to confirm outcomes align with goals."

"Instead of asking if research is participatory or not, we should ask when and how participatory the research is."

"Participatory research doesn’t inherently prevent harm or power differentials; it just engages more people in the process."

"Just because you do more sessions or add review moments doesn’t mean the quality of engagement improves."

"We formed a lived expert review board to support framing conclusions and decisions, rebalancing power from academic peer reviewers."

"Many ethical and practical issues prevent us from conducting longitudinal research with children under 18 in foster care."

"Participation is an ethical commitment but should be complemented by an ethic of care, valuing people’s time and being trauma responsive."

Ask the Rosenbot
Courtney Kaplan
Taking it to the next level: Career paths in DesignOps
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Dave Gray
Liminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Chris Chapo
Data Science and Design: A Tale of Two Tribes
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Bria Alexander
State of DesignOps Panel
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Sam Proulx
Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Frances Yllana
DesignOps Exposed: What do our peers really think of us?
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Stephen Anderson
Puzzled? How to Coordinate Humans for Complex Challenges
2021 • Enterprise Community
Beth Chappell
Leading through ambiguity: Supporting a design team relearning their craft
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Conference
Andrew Custage
The Digital Journey: Research on Consumer Frustration and Loyalty
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Harry Brignull
Beyond Clicks and Tricks: Why deceptive design has grown into a regulatory faultline
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Broad Strokes: Connecting Design, Research, and AI to the World Around Us
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Hana Nagel
Turning Research Ripples into Waves
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Kurdin Bazaz
Culture, DIBS & Recruiting
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Lisa Welchman
Cleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Jen Cardello
Learning Velocity—The Insights Speedometer
2021 • Advancing Research Community
Ashley Cortez
Shifting Toward Community-Led Innovation in Local Government
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold

More Videos

Joe Elmendorf

"High-fidelity maps often squash discussion. Rough maps invite it."

Joe Elmendorf

Shitty Maps: A Trojan Horse for Sensemaking

July 9, 2026

Kevin M. Hoffman

"Project management is the ecosystem connecting everyone to deliver the best branded dog communication technology."

Kevin M. Hoffman

Theme 2: Enterprise Team Journey

June 3, 2019

Rittika Basu

"Digital literacy requires someone to examine and peruse information on digital platforms, not just basic use."

Rittika Basu

Age and Interfaces: Equipping Older Adults with Technological Tools

February 23, 2023

George Aye

"Not every project needs to be responded to; not every RFP needs a proposal."

George Aye

That Quiet Little Voice: When Design and Ethics Collide

November 16, 2022

Andreas Huebner

"The pandemic pushed us to be creative, and it’s been fun for users to participate remotely in the design process."

Andreas Huebner Amy Takata Craig Brookes

What Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?

March 11, 2021

Kaitlin Tasker

"The town of Carlsgo wasn't consciously disadvantaging women, they were just following a best practice that ignored different experiences."

Kaitlin Tasker

Fast and Fearless Inclusive Research

March 27, 2023

Steve Portigal

"Strategic positioning means research is a decision-making tool, not just a service to requests."

Steve Portigal Alba Villamil Sam Ladner

The Future of Research: Bridging the Gaps

July 29, 2021

Bilan Hashi

"The truth about stories is that is all that we are – Thomas King."

Bilan Hashi

The Tension Between Story Collecting and Story Telling in Research

March 10, 2021

Jemma Ahmed

"I would prefer not to reduce human understanding to shallow sound bites."

Jemma Ahmed

Theme 1 Intro

March 10, 2026