Summary
This talk aims to unpack the notion of participation used in participatory design research, by proposing a framework through which different levels of participation can occur at different stages of the research process. Drawing examples of work in child welfare and foster care, this framework is ultimately an invitation to challenge the notion that participation is binary (i.e., either research is participatory or isn't) or fixed (i.e., there is only one way participation can be done). Instead, participation is a negotiation that should take into account different factors (e.g., partners, resources, timeline), and could include a combination of different levels at different stages in any given research study.
Key Insights
-
•
Participation in research should be viewed as a continuum across different stages and degrees, not a binary or single ladder.
-
•
Arnstein's ladder of participation, while influential, oversimplifies participation by focusing mainly on power transfer and neglecting safety, well-being, and other goals.
-
•
The spiral model of participatory action research adds a temporal dimension emphasizing ongoing reflection and participant feedback throughout the project.
-
•
Meaningful participation requires more than just involving people; it demands trauma-responsiveness, safety, mutuality, compensation, and avoiding tokenism.
-
•
Mapping degrees and sites of participation creates diverse assemblies unique to each research project, highlighting complexity and flexibility.
-
•
Involving people with lived experience as research team members enhances study design, recruitment, data interpretation, and dissemination.
-
•
External academic peer review can exert power that conflicts with participatory research goals, so forming a lived expert review board can rebalance power.
-
•
Metrics quantifying the quantity of participation (e.g., number of sessions or participants) risk misrepresenting the quality and ethics of engagement.
-
•
Longitudinal research with foster youth faces ethical and practical challenges, especially around consent and developmental readiness, often limiting study scope.
-
•
Participation should be considered an ethical commitment, but it must be complemented by care ethics and trauma-informed practices to avoid harm.
Notable Quotes
"Youth, families, and communities impacted by the child welfare system experience a lot of loss of control, with important aspects of their lives decided without their input."
"Participation is one way to minimize loss of control and allow people to exercise their agency and autonomy."
"Arnstein’s ladder reduces participation to delegating decision-making power, ignoring goals like safety, well-being, and satisfaction."
"The spiral model introduces temporality—constantly going back to participants to confirm outcomes align with goals."
"Instead of asking if research is participatory or not, we should ask when and how participatory the research is."
"Participatory research doesn’t inherently prevent harm or power differentials; it just engages more people in the process."
"Just because you do more sessions or add review moments doesn’t mean the quality of engagement improves."
"We formed a lived expert review board to support framing conclusions and decisions, rebalancing power from academic peer reviewers."
"Many ethical and practical issues prevent us from conducting longitudinal research with children under 18 in foster care."
"Participation is an ethical commitment but should be complemented by an ethic of care, valuing people’s time and being trauma responsive."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
More Videos
"I put down my question guide and just talked with Carol."
Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Randy Duke II
March 30, 2020
"This is a moment to rethink identity beyond UX and get creative with income streams and career paths."
Corey Nelson Amy SanteeLayoffs
November 15, 2022
"If you measure an infinite number of customers, every change would be statistically significant, but not every change would be meaningful."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"We’re often stuck on a hamster wheel of short-term metrics like daily or monthly active users that don’t capture long-term success."
Amy BucherHarnessing behavioral science to uncover deeper truths
March 12, 2025
"You don’t design interfaces anymore—you choreograph intentions."
David SternbergUncovering the hidden forces shaping user behavior
July 17, 2025
"If you dug deeper into feedback, you'd find ways to address issues without a big change."
Deanna SmithLeading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
September 23, 2024
"Power hoarding, paternalism, perfectionism—these uphold white supremacy culture in design."
Jennifer StricklandAdopting a "Design By" Method
December 9, 2021
"Trying to do all things well can mean doing all things kind of not so great—specialization became necessary."
Rachel Posman John CalhounA Closer Look at Team Ops and Product Ops (Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin)
November 19, 2020
"Mirroring content by repeating back what people say helps them understand their own ideas better."
Gina MendoliaTherapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems
December 3, 2024
