Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population

Gold
Wednesday, September 29, 2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Share the love for this talk
SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
Speakers: Sam Proulx
Link:

Summary

Did you know that the SUS creates biases in your research, affecting one in five people? That’s right! People with disabilities, especially those who use assistive technology, are not considered by most of the questions in the SUS. As a designer, this could lead to you making design decisions that don’t take into account 20 percent of the visitors to your website. When the SUS was invented, the author encouraged people to change it to suit different needs. In this talk, Samuel Proulx from Fable will discuss how Fable adapted the SUS to work for assistive technology users. Drawing from over five thousand hours of research and testing involving assistive technology users, we created the Accessible Usability Scale (AUS). This presentation will include trends in AUS responses since it was released in December of 2020.

Key Insights

  • Screen readers require highly structured and semantically correct web content to enable efficient navigation for blind users.

  • Screen reader users often customize speed and voice settings to consume information at 400-800 words per minute, much faster than typical speech.

  • Alternative navigation devices, such as head mice and switch systems, rely on precise physical control and can be hindered by environmental factors like vibrations.

  • Current think-aloud usability testing methods create cognitive overload for assistive technology users, as they must manage device output, researcher communication, and narration simultaneously.

  • Travel and physical accessibility barriers severely limit the participation of people with disabilities in traditional usability labs.

  • Assistive technologies are highly personalized, so standard lab setups often fail to support users’ customized configurations, reducing test validity.

  • Standard System Usability Scale (SUS) questions inadequately capture the unique needs and experiences of assistive technology users.

  • Fable’s Accessible Usability Scale (AUS) adapts SUS questions to reflect assistive technology usage, improving relevance and accuracy.

  • Preliminary AUS results show screen reader users rate usability lower than magnification users, reflecting the greater complexity and demands of screen reader use.

  • Inclusive research requires adapting methods to account for varied assistive technologies, emphasizing flexibility and one-size-does-not-fit-all approaches.

Notable Quotes

"What screen readers allow us to do is to jump directly to bits of content that we are interested in to replicate the visual experience of skimming a web page."

"Most screen reader users prefer robotic voices so they can speed up the speech and read much faster than typical people."

"Alternative navigation includes things like switch systems, voice dictation, and head mice to replace standard keyboard and mouse."

"Traveling to a research lab can take longer than the research session itself for people with physical disabilities due to specialty transit."

"Every piece of assistive technology is highly customized for the individual, so labs often fail to replicate users’ ideal setups."

"The standard SUS question about needing a technical person to use the system is frustrating because many assistive tech users are very technical themselves."

"The question who are most people is confusing when applied to assistive technology users in usability scales."

"John Rucklin said if your questionnaire isn’t relevant, you can devise your own — and that’s what we did with the Accessible Usability Scale."

"Screen reader users scored in the low to mid 50s on our scale while magnification users scored around 70 and alternative navigation users around 60."

"Inclusive design is about one size fits one, not one size fits all, especially in research methodologies."

Ask the Rosenbot
Panel Discussion: Communicating the Value of DesignOps
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Dr. Jamika D. Burge
The Future of Research: Bridging the Gaps
2021 • Advancing Research Community
Kit Unger
Theme 1 Intro
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
How to use the Rosenbot
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Dominique Ward
The Most Exciting Time for DesignOps is Now
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Lavy Kumar
Future of Work
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Peter Van Dijck
Coffee with Lou #4: Taking a Peek Under the Rosenbot's Hood
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Dr. Jamika D. Burge
Advancing the Inclusion of Womxn in Research Practices
2022 • Advancing Research Community
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
AI: Passionate defenses and reasoned critique [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Lena Shenkarenko
Collaborative Wireframing for Creating Team Alignment and Shipping Better Products
2020 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Joseph Meersman
Sweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Ben Blumenrose
The AI + Design wave has arrived: Making sense of the 2026 AI + Design Report
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Conference
PJ Buddhari
Meet Spectrum, Adobe’s Design System
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Alana Washington
Theme 1: Introduction and Provocation
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Lisa Gironda
Opener: Chief of Staff–An unexpected journey
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Victor Udoewa
Theme One Intro
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold

More Videos

Kate Towsey

"Synthetic users might be okay for finding average behaviors, but they won’t replace unique insights from real users."

Kate Towsey Basel Fakhoury Oren Friedman Graham Gardner

Participant Recruitment and Management Tools

March 12, 2026

Jennifer Kong

"Users were initially excited but six months later expressed frustration and uncertainty about the tool’s usefulness."

Jennifer Kong

Journeying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare

June 5, 2024

Kevin M. Hoffman

"Having a business background is almost the oldest form of product management, but great product requires balancing design and tech too."

Kevin M. Hoffman

Theme 2: Enterprise Team Journey

June 3, 2019

Amy Marquez

"Creating internal champions in client organizations helps improve adoption and reduces churn."

Amy Marquez

INVEST: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Gretchen Anderson

"Human-centered design is not just about your end users, it’s about the humans in your team."

Gretchen Anderson

Scaling the Human Center

June 8, 2017

April Reagan

"Foresight is a team sport—the more perspectives you have, the better your future scenarios become."

April Reagan

Look, Think, Act: The Futures-Smart Design Organization

October 1, 2021

Dante Guintu

"The pandemic flipped the equation, and IBM became the place that design talent left."

Dante Guintu

How to Crush the Talent Crunch

September 8, 2022

Jaime Creixems

"Establish a design system council where all stakeholders gather regularly to maintain and evolve the system."

Jaime Creixems

Best Practices when Creating and Maintaining a Design System

June 7, 2023

Billy Carlson

"Collaboration is key; wireframes shouldn’t be thrown over the fence from UX to design without discussion."

Billy Carlson

Principles of Team Wireframing

October 2, 2023