Summary
In this session, we’re not just discussing UX Research as it is—but would it could be. Taylor Klassman, Director of UX Research at Dscout, will lead an interactive exploration of bold “What If?” scenarios that challenge assumptions and open new possibilities for the future of our field. Framed around the Four Pillars of Controlling Our Destiny—Purpose, People, Process, and Progress, this session will tackle the evolving role of research amidst shifting budgets, AI-driven automation, and the increasing speed of decision-making. Through engaging discussions and Miro usage, we’ll explore how UX researchers can adapt to external forces or take control of our future.
Key Insights
-
•
UX research currently lives in tension between AI optimism and skepticism, reflecting deep uncertainty about automation's role.
-
•
Perceived value of research fluctuates; some feel devalued while others, like Robert, emphasize relational power to amplify impact.
-
•
Job market insecurity contrasts with investments in research operations maturation, creating complex career dynamics.
-
•
Scientific rigor often clashes with corporate decision-making realities, calling for adaptive research processes, as discussed by Julie and Kristen.
-
•
Remote environments challenge traditional methods of stakeholder engagement and relationship-building, reducing immersive experiences.
-
•
Visualizing research impact as an evolving story rather than static metrics (like CSAT) can better communicate progress over time.
-
•
The UX field is expanding and blending with other disciplines, causing identity tensions and pushback on role boundaries.
-
•
Democratizing research as a business skill can be beneficial but requires experts to maintain rigor and questionable findings.
-
•
Long game tactics, such as Trojan horse research, help practitioners create meaningful impact within organizational constraints.
-
•
Technology and design choices reflect embedded worldviews; UX professionals hold power to influence these decisions toward inclusivity.
Notable Quotes
"We have these four pillars—purpose, people, process, and progress—that ground our thinking about UX research's future."
"AI-driven results are often 30 to 50 percent hallucinogenic—meaning not real—so we need to be cautious about overreliance."
"Our truth is no longer singular; transparency and comprehensive storytelling are more important than ever in research."
"In a remote environment, building authentic, deep relationships with stakeholders is a key skill for researchers."
"Sometimes we have to do a bait and switch—meet organizational demands but turn that into opportunities to learn."
"Democratizing research is okay as long as we remain experts in rigorous methods and question questionable research kindly."
"We often adapt within imperfect systems rather than fight them outright, aiming for longer-term change."
"Impact of research is not always immediate or linear; it can be a long-term, complex process to measure."
"The UX field's expansion leads to pushback—people ask why researchers talk about areas owned by others like OCM."
"Technology is a series of choices designers and technologists make, often small but impactful; we must demand better choices that work for all of us."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"When I think back on audits, it was usually one individual doing it; I recommend at least having a team of two or three involved."
Eduardo Ortiz Robin Beers Rachael Dietkus, LCSW Bruce Gillespie Jess Greco Marieke McCloskey Renee ReidDay 3 Theme Panel
March 13, 2025
"The current design education system doesn't always prepare designers for the complexity of enterprise challenges."
Alexandra SchmidtEnterprise UX Playbook
December 1, 2022
"Providing stakeholders with real user voices alongside insights is key to internalizing and acting on research."
Andy Barraclough Betsy NelsonFrom Costly Complexity to Efficient Insights: Why UX Teams Are Switching To Voxpopme
September 23, 2024
"A lot of design ops impact comes from influence, and influence comes from empathy and showing the benefit of what you are putting out."
Bria Alexander Laura Gatewood Corey Long Daniel Orbach Laine Prokay Deanna SmithThe Big Question about Resilience: A panel discussion
September 23, 2024
"Getting people who don’t communicate well to at least work together on a single thing is the first step to innovating together."
Jon Fukuda Amy Evans Ignacio Martinez Joe MeersmanThe Big Question about Innovation: A Panel Discussion
September 25, 2024
"Only one internal hire on the UX team was a huge misopportunity for us."
Renee ReidBecoming a ResearchH.E.R (Highly Enterprise Ready)
June 3, 2019
"Power hoarding, paternalism, perfectionism—these uphold white supremacy culture in design."
Jennifer StricklandAdopting a "Design By" Method
December 9, 2021
"Performance is about how effectively we translate experience into new understanding and turn that into wiser action."
Jen BriselliLearning is the north star: service design for adaptive capacity
November 19, 2025
"I think of AI models as amanuenses, like super secretaries aiding scholars in the early modern period."
Jorge ArangoAI as Thought Partner: How to Use LLMs to Transform Your Notes (3rd of 3 seminars)
May 3, 2024
