Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
Enthusiasm for AI tools, especially large language models like ChatGPT, is everywhere, but what does it actually look like to deliver large-scale user-facing experiences using these tools in a production environment? Clearly they're powerful, but what do they need to make them work reliably and at scale? In this session, Sarah provides a perspective on some of the information architecture and user experience infrastructure organizations need to effectively leverage AI. She also shares three AI experiences currently live on Microsoft Learn: An interactive assistant that helps users post high-quality questions to a community forum A tool that dynamically creates learning plans based on goals the user shares A training assistant that clarifies, defines, and guides learners while they study Through lessons learned from shipping these experiences over the last two years, UXers, IAs, and PMs will come away with a better sense of what they might need to make these hyped-up technologies work in real life.
Key Insights
-
•
Most AI applications no longer require building foundation models from scratch; the focus is now on application development and integration.
-
•
Single, all-purpose chatbots (everything chatbots) are insufficient because they handle high ambiguity and diverse, often complex tasks poorly.
-
•
Sarah introduces the ambiguity footprint as a framework to measure AI application complexity and risks across several axes such as task complexity, context, interface, prompt openness, and sensitivity.
-
•
AI features that support simple, complimentary user tasks, rather than critical or complex ones, are easier and safer to build and scale.
-
•
Visible AI interfaces, like chatbots, set clearer user expectations but introduce more ambiguity and management overhead compared to invisible AI (e.g., keyboard optimizations).
-
•
Prompt engineering plays a crucial role in defining the boundaries of AI output, from very open-ended to highly restricted scopes.
-
•
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) helps manage up-to-date context by dynamically querying relevant data chunks rather than using static corpus.
-
•
Evaluating AI outputs rigorously is essential but often underprioritized; without clear quality metrics, teams end up relying on subjective or anecdotal assessments.
-
•
Data ethics and distributed AI implementations can create blind spots, limiting feedback loops necessary for continuous AI model improvement.
-
•
Incrementally building AI applications with smaller ambiguity footprints helps organizations develop expertise and controls before tackling more complex, open-ended AI products.
Notable Quotes
"You’re not doing IA, but you’re always doing it."
"An everything chat bot is almost certainly not how you’re going to build it; realistically you’re building three apps in a trench coat."
"AI is ambiguous at best because we’re fully in the realm of probabilistic rather than deterministic programming."
"The more complex the task, the less likely it is to be successful with current AI."
"A task where AI adds a little something is honestly easier to get right than one where it’s absolutely critical."
"Visible AI interfaces introduce another place where you can add ambiguity."
"Retrieval Augmented Generation lets you supply specific relevant information to the model dynamically rather than everything at once."
"Evaluation might be the most important part of your entire development effort and is often the hardest to do well."
"You can’t just eyeball results and call it good; AI applications are expensive and complex and require systematic evaluation."
"Never build or buy an everything chat bot again; start with less ambiguous, targeted AI experiences."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
More Videos
"Knowing in action is the intuition practiced by competent designers, a core of artistry."
Yoel SumitroActions and Reflections: Bridging the Skills Gap among Researchers
March 9, 2022
"Share everything, own nothing but credit everyone."
Zariah CameronReDesigning Wellbeing for Equitable Care in the Workplace
September 23, 2024
"This is a just-do-it moment. Ask for forgiveness, not permission."
Doug PowellDesignOps and the Next Frontier: Leading Through Unpredictable Change
September 11, 2025
"A common toxic behavior is glory seeking, like presenting work as your own when it was a team effort."
Darian DavisLessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
January 8, 2024
"New ideas and changes to business trajectories rank pretty far down at only 18% of business leaders seeing it as a value of design."
Mike OrenWhy Pharmaceutical's Research Model Should Replace Design Thinking
March 28, 2023
"System thinking is the cornerstone competency of design operations."
Jacqui FreyScale is Social Work
March 19, 2020
"We do this with intention of fostering a more inclusive experience for audience members who might be sight impaired."
Kim Holt Emma Wylds Pearl Koppenhaver Maisee XiongA Salesforce Panel Discussion on Values-Driven DesignOps
September 8, 2022
"If we think disability as a mismatch between user and environment rather than a medical problem, it becomes easier to understand how accessibility benefits everyone."
Samuel ProulxFrom Standards to Innovation: Why Inclusive Design Wins
September 10, 2025
"The competencies allow managers to celebrate individualism while maintaining consistency across teams."
Laine Riley ProkayHow DesignOps can Drive Inclusive Career Ladders for All
September 30, 2021
