Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
AI in Real Life: Using LLMs to Turbocharge Microsoft Learn
Summary
Enthusiasm for AI tools, especially large language models like ChatGPT, is everywhere, but what does it actually look like to deliver large-scale user-facing experiences using these tools in a production environment? Clearly they're powerful, but what do they need to make them work reliably and at scale? In this session, Sarah provides a perspective on some of the information architecture and user experience infrastructure organizations need to effectively leverage AI. She also shares three AI experiences currently live on Microsoft Learn: An interactive assistant that helps users post high-quality questions to a community forum A tool that dynamically creates learning plans based on goals the user shares A training assistant that clarifies, defines, and guides learners while they study Through lessons learned from shipping these experiences over the last two years, UXers, IAs, and PMs will come away with a better sense of what they might need to make these hyped-up technologies work in real life.
Key Insights
-
•
Most AI applications no longer require building foundation models from scratch; the focus is now on application development and integration.
-
•
Single, all-purpose chatbots (everything chatbots) are insufficient because they handle high ambiguity and diverse, often complex tasks poorly.
-
•
Sarah introduces the ambiguity footprint as a framework to measure AI application complexity and risks across several axes such as task complexity, context, interface, prompt openness, and sensitivity.
-
•
AI features that support simple, complimentary user tasks, rather than critical or complex ones, are easier and safer to build and scale.
-
•
Visible AI interfaces, like chatbots, set clearer user expectations but introduce more ambiguity and management overhead compared to invisible AI (e.g., keyboard optimizations).
-
•
Prompt engineering plays a crucial role in defining the boundaries of AI output, from very open-ended to highly restricted scopes.
-
•
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) helps manage up-to-date context by dynamically querying relevant data chunks rather than using static corpus.
-
•
Evaluating AI outputs rigorously is essential but often underprioritized; without clear quality metrics, teams end up relying on subjective or anecdotal assessments.
-
•
Data ethics and distributed AI implementations can create blind spots, limiting feedback loops necessary for continuous AI model improvement.
-
•
Incrementally building AI applications with smaller ambiguity footprints helps organizations develop expertise and controls before tackling more complex, open-ended AI products.
Notable Quotes
"You’re not doing IA, but you’re always doing it."
"An everything chat bot is almost certainly not how you’re going to build it; realistically you’re building three apps in a trench coat."
"AI is ambiguous at best because we’re fully in the realm of probabilistic rather than deterministic programming."
"The more complex the task, the less likely it is to be successful with current AI."
"A task where AI adds a little something is honestly easier to get right than one where it’s absolutely critical."
"Visible AI interfaces introduce another place where you can add ambiguity."
"Retrieval Augmented Generation lets you supply specific relevant information to the model dynamically rather than everything at once."
"Evaluation might be the most important part of your entire development effort and is often the hardest to do well."
"You can’t just eyeball results and call it good; AI applications are expensive and complex and require systematic evaluation."
"Never build or buy an everything chat bot again; start with less ambiguous, targeted AI experiences."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Being human, authentic, humble, and showing vulnerability can take you a long way as a research leader."
Anna Avrekh Dr. John Pagonis Klara Pelcl Sina SchreiberExpert Panel: Leading in and with Research
March 10, 2022
"Onboarding is critical; the first five minutes an engineer spends working with a system defines their experience."
Nathan CurtisDesign Systems for Us: How Many One-Source(s)-of-Truth Are Enough?
January 17, 2019
"Companies are no longer dependent on where people are located to work."
Lavy Kumar Kat Temple Shan Sebastian Tara Jensen Jenn ChouFuture of Work
June 9, 2021
"Recruiting diverse partners takes time and effort, and we are actively building programs to include people with diverse abilities."
Tracy McGoldrickIBM User Experience Program—The What, Why and How
October 15, 2021
"Moderation is a performance; the best focus groups feel like natural conversations, not rigid Q&A."
Taiye Akin-AkinyosoyeAmplifying voices and enhancing user research through group interviews
March 12, 2025
"I had a hunger for process and efficiency once I built a feedback bot to share customer insights."
Liza Pemstein Jane DavisScaling Research Via an Ops First Model at Clever
March 27, 2023
"Working with AI is a back and forth negotiation, not a vending machine where one prompt gets you the answer."
Kritika SonyMoving AI offscreen: Exploring failures, constraints, and recovery in physical game design
June 10, 2026
"You can’t just make the models great at design without context and iteration."
Paul BakausKilling the handoff: Iterating design live in the browser on real production code
June 10, 2026
"Engineers receive an iron ring to remind them of their fallibility and ethical responsibility to society."
Mariah HayEthics in Tech Education: Designing to Provide Opportunity for All
June 14, 2018
