Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
AI in Real Life: Using LLMs to Turbocharge Microsoft Learn
Summary
Enthusiasm for AI tools, especially large language models like ChatGPT, is everywhere, but what does it actually look like to deliver large-scale user-facing experiences using these tools in a production environment? Clearly they're powerful, but what do they need to make them work reliably and at scale? In this session, Sarah provides a perspective on some of the information architecture and user experience infrastructure organizations need to effectively leverage AI. She also shares three AI experiences currently live on Microsoft Learn: An interactive assistant that helps users post high-quality questions to a community forum A tool that dynamically creates learning plans based on goals the user shares A training assistant that clarifies, defines, and guides learners while they study Through lessons learned from shipping these experiences over the last two years, UXers, IAs, and PMs will come away with a better sense of what they might need to make these hyped-up technologies work in real life.
Key Insights
-
•
Most AI applications no longer require building foundation models from scratch; the focus is now on application development and integration.
-
•
Single, all-purpose chatbots (everything chatbots) are insufficient because they handle high ambiguity and diverse, often complex tasks poorly.
-
•
Sarah introduces the ambiguity footprint as a framework to measure AI application complexity and risks across several axes such as task complexity, context, interface, prompt openness, and sensitivity.
-
•
AI features that support simple, complimentary user tasks, rather than critical or complex ones, are easier and safer to build and scale.
-
•
Visible AI interfaces, like chatbots, set clearer user expectations but introduce more ambiguity and management overhead compared to invisible AI (e.g., keyboard optimizations).
-
•
Prompt engineering plays a crucial role in defining the boundaries of AI output, from very open-ended to highly restricted scopes.
-
•
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) helps manage up-to-date context by dynamically querying relevant data chunks rather than using static corpus.
-
•
Evaluating AI outputs rigorously is essential but often underprioritized; without clear quality metrics, teams end up relying on subjective or anecdotal assessments.
-
•
Data ethics and distributed AI implementations can create blind spots, limiting feedback loops necessary for continuous AI model improvement.
-
•
Incrementally building AI applications with smaller ambiguity footprints helps organizations develop expertise and controls before tackling more complex, open-ended AI products.
Notable Quotes
"You’re not doing IA, but you’re always doing it."
"An everything chat bot is almost certainly not how you’re going to build it; realistically you’re building three apps in a trench coat."
"AI is ambiguous at best because we’re fully in the realm of probabilistic rather than deterministic programming."
"The more complex the task, the less likely it is to be successful with current AI."
"A task where AI adds a little something is honestly easier to get right than one where it’s absolutely critical."
"Visible AI interfaces introduce another place where you can add ambiguity."
"Retrieval Augmented Generation lets you supply specific relevant information to the model dynamically rather than everything at once."
"Evaluation might be the most important part of your entire development effort and is often the hardest to do well."
"You can’t just eyeball results and call it good; AI applications are expensive and complex and require systematic evaluation."
"Never build or buy an everything chat bot again; start with less ambiguous, targeted AI experiences."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The hustle does suck, and Gen Z is doing this other thing over here, arranging in healthier ways."
Deanna ZandtThe Unspoken Complexity of “Self-Care” with Deanna Zandt
July 21, 2022
"If you feel uncomfortable or bullied, it is so important that you know you can reach out for help."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
October 4, 2023
"Design teams must operate across a range of altitudes, from the big picture down to the pixel, and that scale determines the inputs needed."
Ellie Krysl Jon FukudaPlanned Right. Managed Right. Designed Right.
June 6, 2023
"You are allowed to say white supremacy culture here, even if you can’t say that in your day-to-day work."
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW Victor Udoewa Jennifer StricklandEverything You Need to Know about the Civic Design 2022 Call for Presentations
May 17, 2022
"Before, silos ruled. Now, teams share information and make cross-supply chain decisions focused on customers and associates."
Anat Fintzi Rachel MinnicksDelivering at Scale: Making Traction with Resistant Partners
June 9, 2022
"I recommend asking about user needs rather than disability, like whether someone needs captions or larger fonts."
Kate KalcevichIntegrating Accessibility in DesignOps
September 23, 2024
"You wanna capture all the mess, but you cannot operate in the mess. Leave a path back to the mess so details and signals remain available."
John CutlerThe Alignment Trap
November 29, 2023
"I was very conscious of what I perceived might be impatience from stakeholders watching the interview."
Steve Portigal Susan Simon-Daniels Tamara Hale Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Q&A-Discussion
March 30, 2020
"You have to make the user unavoidable in every conversation and decision."
Dan WillisFilling the Void
November 7, 2018
