Designing beyond caricatures: Embracing real, diverse user needs
Summary
Key Insights
-
•
Disability affects one in five people, not a rare subset.
-
•
The medical model of disability stigmatizes individuals by labeling them as broken.
-
•
Designing for an average user is flawed because the average person does not exist.
-
•
Disability is a spectrum that includes permanent, temporary, and situational conditions.
-
•
Assistive technologies like captions have evolved to benefit broad audiences beyond initial users.
-
•
The aging population is increasing the demand for accessible products as disability becomes more common with age.
-
•
Temporary disabilities impact users who still need to engage with products and services effectively.
-
•
Involving people with disabilities as coworkers and co-designers improves identification and elimination of accessibility barriers.
-
•
QA testing with screen readers is valuable, but user research should be conducted by actual assistive technology users.
-
•
Designing for accessibility benefits all users and future-proofs products against diverse user needs.
Notable Quotes
"The average user doesn’t exist."
"People with disabilities are not one in a thousand, or one in a hundred, they are one in five."
"Disability is not a binary, it’s a spectrum."
"We tend to design for people just like us, which is limiting."
"Temporary disability is real and products should support people when they experience it."
"Captions were once an assistive technology for a tiny subset but are now widely used."
"Failing to design for disabilities means failing to design for our future selves."
"Accessibility isn’t just for developers or designers—everyone has a role to play."
"We cannot remove barriers we aren’t aware of."
"Testing with a screen reader is fine for QA, but user research must be with actual screen reader users."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Upskilling customer success managers and others to help with testing meant we could do far more research than I alone could manage."
Dr Chloe SharpUsing Evidence and Collaboration for Setting and Defending Priorities
November 29, 2023
"If you value innovation and design, then you're investing in creativity."
Dr. Karl JeffriesThe Science of Creativity for DesignOps
January 8, 2024
"85% of Netflix users opt for captions, showing how accessibility features benefit everyone, not just those with disabilities."
Amber KnablEmpowering innovation: The critical role of inclusive product development in the AI era
June 4, 2024
"Debate isn’t a bad thing. Challenging each other’s thinking helps you find a better approach."
Dorelle RabinowitzThe Magic Word is Trust
June 15, 2018
"Queerness is change. The power to shape that change is within every one of us."
Dan WillisEnterprise Storytelling Sessions
June 3, 2019
"Helping your team take risks and stretch is critical even though design ops tend to be risk averse by nature."
Courtney KaplanTaking it to the next level: Career paths in DesignOps
November 8, 2018
"Service design’s role isn’t to humanize AI, it’s to humanize the organization around it."
Bethany BrownRewiring operations with service design and AI
November 20, 2025
"AI tells you what you want to hear, which is dangerous if you’re making product decisions based on synthetic feedback."
Laura KleinHuman vs. machine: Testing AI’s ability to synthesize and analyze research
March 11, 2026
"AI can’t experience data subjectively or fulfill curiosity, which drives human insight and discovery in qualitative research."
Weidan LiQualitative synthesis with ChatGPT: Better or worse than human intelligence?
June 4, 2024
