Summary
Designing with rigid assumptions often means creating for a narrow set of “typical” users—people who look and think like us. But this mindset risks excluding real, diverse needs, especially those of people with disabilities, one of the fastest-growing population segments. In this talk, you’ll explore the hidden costs of designing systems for templated personas and learn why flexible, inclusive approaches are essential.
Key Insights
-
•
Disability affects one in five people, not a rare subset.
-
•
The medical model of disability stigmatizes individuals by labeling them as broken.
-
•
Designing for an average user is flawed because the average person does not exist.
-
•
Disability is a spectrum that includes permanent, temporary, and situational conditions.
-
•
Assistive technologies like captions have evolved to benefit broad audiences beyond initial users.
-
•
The aging population is increasing the demand for accessible products as disability becomes more common with age.
-
•
Temporary disabilities impact users who still need to engage with products and services effectively.
-
•
Involving people with disabilities as coworkers and co-designers improves identification and elimination of accessibility barriers.
-
•
QA testing with screen readers is valuable, but user research should be conducted by actual assistive technology users.
-
•
Designing for accessibility benefits all users and future-proofs products against diverse user needs.
Notable Quotes
"The average user doesn’t exist."
"People with disabilities are not one in a thousand, or one in a hundred, they are one in five."
"Disability is not a binary, it’s a spectrum."
"We tend to design for people just like us, which is limiting."
"Temporary disability is real and products should support people when they experience it."
"Captions were once an assistive technology for a tiny subset but are now widely used."
"Failing to design for disabilities means failing to design for our future selves."
"Accessibility isn’t just for developers or designers—everyone has a role to play."
"We cannot remove barriers we aren’t aware of."
"Testing with a screen reader is fine for QA, but user research must be with actual screen reader users."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Our code of conduct is not window dressing; it’s the front end of a process to keep everyone safe."
Louis RosenfeldWelcome / Housekeeping
June 6, 2023
"Cybernetics is the discipline of systems with purpose, looking at how a system acts to achieve its goals."
Paul Pangaro, PhDSystems Disciplines: Table Stakes for 21st Century Organizations
June 6, 2023
"Often we’re seen just as people who create personas or blueprints, but that’s not even what’s needed."
Dharani PereraThe mandala of service design: unlocking alignment and action through service design
November 20, 2025
"The most important thing to remember is to be flexible in your concept of a deliverable."
Tiffany ChengDesigning in a Pandemic: Integrating Speed and Rigor
June 9, 2022
"Startups struggle daily with pricing, and conjoint analysis is the single most underrated tool to find optimal prices."
Ricardo MartinsUnlocking the power of advanced quantitative methods
March 12, 2025
"Data is expressive, but just because it’s a chart doesn’t mean the data is true or fair."
William Newton Jenny ChangHow to Lead With Data, and Without Data
June 7, 2023
"Choosing to remain silent is still a choice; agency means owning how and if you participate."
Sahibzada MayedThe Politics of Radical Research: A Manifesto
March 27, 2023
"Design research—they need each other. They are much, much better together."
Prayag NarulaHow to Empower Your Designers to Do Good Research – And Why You Want To
June 10, 2022
"Designers and developers work from the same source of truth, promoting pixel-perfect parity and consistent user experience."
Jack BeharHow to Build Prototypes that Behave like an End-Product
December 6, 2022
