Ethics in Tech Education: Designing to Provide Opportunity for All
Summary
We know that ability is equally distributed among humans, but opportunity is not. As the need for skilled technologists grows, so must our ability to empower individuals with accessible tech training. The data that can be gathered about an individual’s learning patterns can help inform the ultimate personalized educational experience, accelerating the cycle from novice to master, or it could be weaponized – used to judge an individual and block opportunities for jobs and advancement. As we design experiences and systems, we become the ethical stewards of the impact we could have on millions of lives. It’s up to us to make the right, and often hard decisions. Hear from Mariah Hay, VP of Product at Pluralsight about her experience designing product for tech education, the choices her teams have made to avoid weaponization, and how human centered design can inform the ethical underpinnings of our missions, our companies, and our bottom lines.
Key Insights
-
•
Human-centered designers have historically combined problem-finding with problem-solving, but must guard against becoming problem-creators.
-
•
Ethical codes established in medicine, like respect for autonomy and non-maleficence, provide valuable frameworks for technology designers.
-
•
Engineers take an iron ring as a symbol of ethical responsibility and personal fallibility, illustrating deep commitment to public safety.
-
•
Software and design failures in areas like electronic medical records can cause fatal errors, underscoring the life-impact of design decisions.
-
•
High-profile ethical breaches like Volkswagen’s emissions scandal demonstrate how deliberate unethical choices at multiple levels cause widespread harm.
-
•
Cambridge Analytica’s misuse of personal data shows ethical risks when designers are disconnected from the societal impact of their work.
-
•
In education technology, balancing individual learner privacy with enterprise client needs requires active ethical decision-making and compromise.
-
•
Avoiding ‘weaponizing’ products means resisting the urge to implement features that could harm users, like forced assessments tied to promotions.
-
•
Ethical design processes must include comprehensive user research to understand concerns, priorities, and the nuances of impact.
-
•
Companies alone cannot have ethics; ethical responsibility lies with individual practitioners who must cultivate awareness and act courageously.
Notable Quotes
"We are problem-finders and problem-solvers, but if we’re not very careful, we can also become problem-creators."
"Ethics are the discipline of dealing with what is good or bad with moral duty and obligation."
"First-do-no-harm actually goes farther than just not causing harm; it involves striving for the best possible outcome."
"Engineers receive an iron ring to remind them of their fallibility and ethical responsibility to society."
"Medical errors should rank as the third leading cause of death in the US, many influenced by software and communication failures."
"Volkswagen’s leadership and engineers made conscious choices to break laws that harmed people’s health and our environment."
"Being far removed from the consequences of your design work can lead to apathy and a shrug of the shoulders."
"We made the conscious decision not to weaponize our product, even though it could have increased revenue and sales."
"Find your blind spots and be honest about your and your team’s abilities to avoid harm."
"Ethics must live in the practitioner; companies are not people and cannot embody ethics without individuals choosing to do so."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Anticipate resistance; if a project has a lot of scrutiny, controversial insights are likely."
Robin BeersBeyond Insights: Researchers as Organizational Change Catalysts
March 25, 2024
"Research leaders have a superpower to connect dots between users and the entire organization."
Gregg BernsteinOpportunistic Research with Gregg Bernstein
July 11, 2019
"Serendipity happens when you explore across different journeys, personas, and contexts in the knowledge repository."
Tony TurnerCapturing Deep Insights
September 30, 2021
"Ambiguity is totally normalized here and there’s a baseline acceptance that the business is kind of unknowable."
Rebecca GimenezWork in Progress: Service Design at Airbnb
December 3, 2024
"A big challenge is that a lot of governmental sites are filled with legally correct but totally incomprehensible content."
Yalenka Mariën Marie MervaillieDesigning for Digital Inclusion in the Belgian Government
December 8, 2021
"Don't be precious but don't be reckless either when opening research access to others."
Janelle EstesUX Research Trends
January 28, 2021
"You don’t have to sit through two hours a day; we’ll spend about 15 minutes on setup then you’ll pair up and do the exercise."
Dave GrayGroup Activity: Making Sense of DesignOps
November 7, 2017
"Supporting older adults in UX research reveals a community that is often undervalued and underlooked."
Theme 3 Intro
March 11, 2022
"We created a change log to document roadmap and user story map updates due to evolving requirements and regulations."
Laureen Kattan Julie KimCentering Patients and Clinicians in a Complex Government Ecosystem
November 29, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How do evals help build confidence in the quality of AI system outputs despite stochasticity?
How do product risk categories like feasibility, viability, desirability, and usability relate to research method choice?
What task scope limitations should be considered when working with AI for code generation or design assistance?