Summary
How do you evaluate designers fairly and effectively while providing a clear path toward career advancement? This is a question our organization has grappled with throughout our eight years as a company. Design can often be left up to gut reasoning by leadership and designers may not have a clear understanding of what their role means and how they may grow as designers. We’ve developed iterations of different tools and processes over the years to address these concerns and to evolve with our shifting needs as a growing company. All of which has led us to a robust tool that we’ve been using over the past two years which can serve as a model for how organizations can deploy qualitative career advancement. The session will cover our journey to this point and showcase the tools and processes we’ve deployed to make evaluation and career advancement systematic within a design organization along with surprising benefits and lessons we’ve learned along the way.
Key Insights
-
•
Grant Studio’s career path system evaluates designers in craft, quality, client, and team categories to drive well-rounded growth.
-
•
Continuous anonymous feedback after projects keeps evaluation timely and focused on individual goals.
-
•
Performance evaluations happen twice yearly and aggregate feedback from multiple project leads.
-
•
A Google Sheets tool was chosen over commercial software for flexibility and control over the evaluation structure.
-
•
Weighting of evaluation categories varies by role level; craft and quality dominate for designers, client and team for leads.
-
•
Career managers mentor designers and advocate for them in staffing and promotions.
-
•
The system promotes generalists who can work holistically across projects rather than specialists.
-
•
Grant Studio removed the 'studio development' category after realizing designers deprioritized extracurricular activities due to workload.
-
•
There is a recognized challenge in evaluating non-linear career moves and leadership roles within the current linear career path.
-
•
Transparency and collective involvement in the evaluation system foster buy-in and make difficult career conversations fairer.
Notable Quotes
"Evaluations and promotions can be nebulous and awkward, especially in collaborative design work."
"We built a career path to make evaluations as fair and consistent as possible across roles."
"Continuous feedback is anonymous and focused on teammates’ goals to help keep focus on what matters most."
"Our evaluation tool is a Google Sheet so we can quickly make adjustments without being bogged down by unnecessary features."
"The system encourages growth not just in craft but also in client engagement and team collaboration."
"We want to build consultants who can solve problems across a variety of projects and clients."
"Career managers develop close relationships with designers and advocate for staffing and promotions on their behalf."
"We’ve had to retire the studio development category because it wasn’t prioritized due to project work demands."
"The career path shows when someone is ready for promotion, but additional training may be needed to support leadership transitions."
"Transparency is one of our key values, so everyone in the studio was involved in building and maintaining the evaluation system."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
More Videos
"I hadn’t realized that we were both going to need that advice."
Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Randy Duke II
March 30, 2020
"If you were blindsided recently, I’ve been there. I just really appreciated a kind voice because I didn’t hear a single word they said."
Corey Nelson Amy SanteeLayoffs
November 15, 2022
"When executives start questioning your research details, that’s a good sign they’re engaged and trusting the process."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"We observed a safety risk on a construction site and that helped open a door to honest stories that people wouldn’t have shared otherwise."
Amy BucherHarnessing behavioral science to uncover deeper truths
March 12, 2025
"Every piece of product can be described using components like intent, viscosity, and flow—making UX a physics problem."
David SternbergUncovering the hidden forces shaping user behavior
July 17, 2025
"Leading change is like shopping—take time to find the right store before you buy."
Deanna SmithLeading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
September 23, 2024
"Hiring for lived experience, not just academic credentials, changes the game."
Jennifer StricklandAdopting a "Design By" Method
December 9, 2021
"Employee experience and customer experience are inextricably tied—operationalizing design Ops impacts both."
Rachel Posman John CalhounA Closer Look at Team Ops and Product Ops (Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin)
November 19, 2020
"Coaches organize practices or drills to push players toward specific goals and improvement."
Gina MendoliaTherapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems
December 3, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can design ops quantify its impact to demonstrate value to skeptics in product and engineering?
How can European digital regulations like GDPR and the Accessibility Act impact US companies with products used in Europe?
What does Jakob Nielsen mean by prioritizing secondary user research before primary research?