Civic Design at Scale: Introducing the Public Policy Layer Cake
Summary
In this presentation, the Public Policy Lab team will share their public policy 'layer cake'. Besides reflecting their affinity for baked goods, it’s a systems design framework for creating interventions at all levels of a public service, while also creating opportunities for equity.
Key Insights
-
•
Public services involve multiple layers of human roles with varying power, not just frontline staff.
-
•
Service design must address policies, protocols, and operational structures, not only public-facing tools.
-
•
The 'layer cake' framework maps where and what kind of power exists in government service delivery systems.
-
•
In the Family Pathways to Care project, co-design with caregivers and staff improved intake and referral processes.
-
•
Operational and policy level tools like standardized protocols and data dashboards support frontline service improvements.
-
•
Public feedback channels operating at the organizational level amplify family voices beyond individual service encounters.
-
•
Shared mental models and program typologies help actors at all levels align and make systemic decisions.
-
•
Civic participation tools (e.g., crowdsourcing or participatory budgeting) represent important 'consensus products' in public service ecosystems.
-
•
Designing for systemic change requires understanding and intervening in the interactions between people, tools, rules, and resources.
-
•
Systems change ultimately happens at the human scale by making invisible structures visible and open to redesign.
Notable Quotes
"Service delivery is led by frontline staff who tend to have the least amount of power in the system."
"Public services are a multi-layered culmination of people and products, not just a single entity."
"The layer cake framework helps notice where and what kind of power actually resides in systems."
"Even the best-designed public-facing tools need operational and policy support to succeed."
"We developed family-facing intake tools to make the service experience more transparent and equitable."
"A standard framework for collecting and responding to family feedback at the organizational level can increase their voice’s impact."
"Shared mental models serve as organizing frameworks that all players in the system can understand and make decisions within."
"Putting all programs together on easily comparable terms makes the system material and conceivable."
"Systems change happens at the human scale by making structures and humans visible so we can investigate and change them together."
"Designers hope to support the public in exercising agency and redistribute hegemonic power in public services."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"For bigger decisions, having documented meetings was critical for transparency and defending choices later on."
Dr Chloe SharpUsing Evidence and Collaboration for Setting and Defending Priorities
November 29, 2023
"An elite athlete doesn’t turn up at the Olympics and do their thing without coaches, physios, nutritionists."
Dr. Karl JeffriesThe Science of Creativity for DesignOps
January 8, 2024
"You don’t have to wait until an idea is fully baked to get feedback from assistive technology users."
Amber KnablEmpowering innovation: The critical role of inclusive product development in the AI era
June 4, 2024
"Feedback isn’t about liking. Helpful feedback needs to be, is this solving your problem or not."
Dorelle RabinowitzThe Magic Word is Trust
June 15, 2018
"Personas need to push back. Conflict makes for better stories and better products."
Dan WillisEnterprise Storytelling Sessions
June 3, 2019
"Helping your team take risks and stretch is critical even though design ops tend to be risk averse by nature."
Courtney KaplanTaking it to the next level: Career paths in DesignOps
November 8, 2018
"The real shift wasn’t speed, it was also trust."
Bethany BrownRewiring operations with service design and AI
November 20, 2025
"Well-set-up AI systems pulling data from multiple company sources will have more context, but it’s still limited compared to human understanding."
Laura KleinHuman vs. machine: Testing AI’s ability to synthesize and analyze research
March 11, 2026
"Using analogy is very difficult for AI because it requires a unique human ability to connect and engage through storytelling."
Weidan LiQualitative synthesis with ChatGPT: Better or worse than human intelligence?
June 4, 2024
