Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
Three of your research colleagues discussed and defended their respective positions on what UX research “maturity” looks like. Participants then engaged with them in a discussion and Q&A, facilitated by Lada Gorlenko. “Absent a strong baseline level of data fluency, product teams struggle to harness the power of insight in their work. As UX and UXR leaders, we are uniquely positioned to define what fluency looks like for our organizations and help teams transform to achieve it.” – Megan Blocker “Research has come a long way, but we have a long way to go. Our future success rests on two pivotal aspects of maturity: our leadership’s proximity to power and the use of ‘Strategic Research Programs’ to deliver value beyond Design and Product.“ – Fatimah Richmond “Does UX maturity matter in the age of Generative AI? Is your ability to do well as a team going to depend on your UX skills? Or your tech or people skills?” – Molly Stevens
Key Insights
-
•
Research maturity is not just individual capability but an organizational culture of data fluency and strategic decision-making.
-
•
Research operations and programs should evolve from facilitators to strategic leaders influencing organizational metrics and impact.
-
•
Self-assessment frameworks for teams help foster a collaborative approach to advancing research maturity without condescension.
-
•
Maturity involves knowing when not to do research, choosing the right method, and focusing on outcomes rather than volume of work.
-
•
Embedding research leadership outside traditional design reporting lines (e.g., under strategy or customer operations) can increase influence.
-
•
AI accelerates efficiency in research tasks like data synthesis and interview guide creation, but human insight remains irreplaceable.
-
•
Measuring who champions research and the level of decision-making influence post-research provides actionable insights beyond anecdotes.
-
•
Research teams need dedicated roles focused solely on measuring impact and translating research output into business value metrics.
-
•
Organizational access to niche participants strongly affects research velocity and impact, particularly in enterprise contexts.
-
•
Future research roles will integrate more deeply with insight-driven organizations, moving beyond UX and design silos.
Notable Quotes
"Maturity is not just knowing what to do, but also knowing what not to do and being smart and grown up about saying no."
"The longer I’m in UX, the less I think I know—there’s always more to learn and ways to develop."
"We seldom question whose table we want a seat at or why we don’t rebuild the entire table altogether."
"Research operations should move from execution facilitators to key players in research strategy and metrics."
"If we stay focused on research maturity alone, we'll have problems in the coming years because the ecosystem around us is changing."
"We have to step outside research and understand AI, technology, and product processes to put ourselves in the right space."
"Teams that improve their data fluency and understanding of research get to answers faster and deliver more value."
"Creating personas as a team is more valuable than the persona itself because it creates ownership and empathy."
"Having data to debate and measure research’s organizational impact is critical to escalating our influence."
"It’s a moral obligation for organizations to engage with research and ethics; being mature is not optional anymore."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
More Videos
"Do I find a way to make this conversation more about the software as scheduled or do I show Laura how to react to the unplanned?"
Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Randy Duke II
March 30, 2020
"Negotiating severance is absolutely possible; consider legal advice or coaching when doing so."
Corey Nelson Amy SanteeLayoffs
November 15, 2022
"Every board member can interpret an NPS score differently depending on their role and responsibilities."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"Self-report is not the end all; people often don’t know why they behave certain ways, especially regarding automatic motivations like deeply ingrained mental models."
Amy BucherHarnessing behavioral science to uncover deeper truths
March 12, 2025
"Friction isn’t just annoying; it’s a force that reshapes behavior and can slow or stop user flow."
David SternbergUncovering the hidden forces shaping user behavior
July 17, 2025
"Leading change is like shopping—take time to find the right store before you buy."
Deanna SmithLeading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
September 23, 2024
"Power hoarding, paternalism, perfectionism—these uphold white supremacy culture in design."
Jennifer StricklandAdopting a "Design By" Method
December 9, 2021
"Our team Ops Charter is about amplifying and celebrating the work and impact of design and design Ops."
Rachel Posman John CalhounA Closer Look at Team Ops and Product Ops (Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin)
November 19, 2020
"Creating and holding space is like putting bumpers up in bowling so people know they won’t fail if they engage."
Gina MendoliaTherapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems
December 3, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are examples of scaffolding rituals that help product teams make discovery a regular cadence?
How can AI integration be embedded into designers’ competency frameworks and development plans?
What challenges and opportunities arise when implementing new workflow processes in large legacy companies like Microsoft?