Summary
More and more researchers with no business or product backgrounds are in product research. In the day-to-day industry practice, we are called to march towards the same goal despite our different ways of knowing, talking, and past experiences. Failing to do so could lead to missing opportunities for innovation, reinventing the wheels, and building products that may pose risks to society. When ‘thought worlds’ collide, what can we do to better understand and support each other? This talk answers the question by taking a closer look at the differences and similarities between research and practice, and offering lessons learned about communication and collaboration within diverse product teams made up of a mix of academic and professional disciplines.
Key Insights
-
•
The research-practice gap manifests as misaligned expectations between academia and industry.
-
•
Different forms of research bring unique perspectives and methods that must be appreciated for effective collaboration.
-
•
Translating complex academic findings into actionable insights is crucial for practitioners in design and UX.
-
•
Interdisciplinary teams with diverse backgrounds lead to more innovative solutions in UX research and design.
-
•
Understanding the different purposes of research versus practice is essential for improving communication between researchers and stakeholders.
Notable Quotes
"This talk is about being misunderstood and navigating an identity crisis."
"The research practice gap frustrates me and I try to bridge it when it makes sense to."
"The gaps are important to close for better products and a better world."
"Researchers and practitioners don’t really hang out, and that’s a problem."
"Advancing research is a matter of chance, strategy, and marketing too."
"When you see a paper that excites you, don’t hesitate to translate and share it with practitioners."
"In interdisciplinary teams, start with questions about roles, goals, and personal passions."
"Accept conflict as the norm in diverse teams and steer it into a productive debate zone."
More Videos
"What do you want your AI to do? What do you want their background to be?"
Noz UrbinaRapid AI-powered UX (RAUX): A framework for empowering human designers
May 1, 2025
"Each first take was the only take, which got pressed on the album."
Jim KalbachJazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration
June 4, 2019
"Can you sit down with the people that you work with?"
Holly ColeUnderstanding Experiences: When you have to do more than work
November 8, 2018
"All the rules defined for the header apply, ensuring consistency throughout our design."
Jack BeharHow to Build Prototypes that Behave like an End-Product
December 6, 2022
"Welcome to day two of Design Ops 2023. If you can believe it, we are halfway through our programming today."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
October 3, 2023
"Focus on destination rather than just vehicle; what are we trying to achieve with AI?"
Erika FlowersAI-Readiness: Preparing NASA for a Data-Driven, Agile Future
June 10, 2025
"Teachers need actionable insights, not just raw data."
Kristin SkinnerFive Years of DesignOps
September 29, 2021
"The soloist has to begin at the start of the form and end at the end of that form."
Jim KalbachJazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration
November 6, 2017
"We need to tap into everybody's creativity to find solutions for societal challenges."
Surya VankaUnleashing Swarm Creativity to Solve Enterprise Challenges
June 10, 2021
