When Thought-worlds Collide: Collaborating Between Research and Practice
Summary
More and more researchers with no business or product backgrounds are in product research. In the day-to-day industry practice, we are called to march towards the same goal despite our different ways of knowing, talking, and past experiences. Failing to do so could lead to missing opportunities for innovation, reinventing the wheels, and building products that may pose risks to society. When ‘thought worlds’ collide, what can we do to better understand and support each other? This talk answers the question by taking a closer look at the differences and similarities between research and practice, and offering lessons learned about communication and collaboration within diverse product teams made up of a mix of academic and professional disciplines.
Key Insights
-
•
The research-practice gap exists not just between academia and industry but also among different research layers like academic, applied, and design research.
-
•
Academics focus on advancing knowledge often without immediate practical impact, while industry prioritizes delivering value quickly and actionably.
-
•
Researchers and practitioners frequently fail to engage or communicate on platforms like Twitter, contributing to mutual isolation.
-
•
Translating complex academic findings into accessible, actionable language significantly improves their usability for designers.
-
•
The timing of delivering research resources is crucial; designers seek different information at different phases of the design process.
-
•
Combining research dissemination with marketing strategies and knowing your audience increases the effectiveness of communication.
-
•
Interdisciplinary teams benefit from starting conversations with personal introductions and goals before diving into business discussions.
-
•
Conflict in teams is inevitable but manageable by steering it into constructive debate and fostering psychological safety.
-
•
Self-awareness about how one debates and communicates disagreement improves team dynamics and outcomes.
-
•
Personal identity and relationships deeply influence how one navigates and bridges gaps between different professional and cultural worlds.
Notable Quotes
"My talk is about being misunderstood and navigating an identity crisis."
"What exactly did you observe that makes you say that? What past experience let you think that way?"
"The research-practice gap frustrates me, and I try to bridge it when it makes sense to."
"Science doesn’t just check truth; it has to win hearts and minds."
"Design has to be fast, accessible, actionable, and intuitive, whereas science is often slow and hard to act on."
"If you want to prove someone wrong, you’re actually not seeing the person in front of you."
"Teams with different thought worlds should start with who they are, what their roles are, and their passions inside and outside work."
"Strong teams are self-aware of how they communicate disagreement and interpret others."
"It’s our job to see the person in front of us, and if that means having an uncomfortable conversation, have that conversation."
"As you touch a human soul, be just another human soul."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We created Tiger teams that work like cancer cell hunters, targeting isolated problems and then dissolving after their work is done."
Maria GiudiceRemaking the Making Company: Moving from Product to Experience
June 9, 2016
"Use your UX skills to design better working relationships by empathizing with colleagues like you do with users."
Christian CrumlishAMA with Christian Crumlish, author of Product Management for UX People
March 24, 2022
"Thirty to fifty percent of total efforts are typically spent on rework, which saps morale and wastes resources."
Rima Campbell Amrit S BhachuIncrease Productivity and Drive Business Impact
September 24, 2024
"We still think of accessibility as a binary when it should be recognized as a continuum."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
June 10, 2022
"The needs of a government of the people should be the needs of the people."
Victor UdoewaRadical Participatory Design: Decolonizing Participatory Design Processes
December 10, 2021
"A large organization’s security protocols make AI adoption slower and more complex than in smaller groups."
Jon Fukuda Amy Evans Ignacio Martinez Joe MeersmanThe Big Question about Innovation: A Panel Discussion
September 25, 2024
"Our ability to entice participants to share their most personal stories raises the potential to exploit them for design research."
Rachael Dietkus, LCSWTrauma-Responsive Design: Reimagining the Future of Design Now
December 10, 2021
"Momentum is great, but without a disciplined system, things will go back to the way they were."
Kyria Stephens Marlon KernerPower to Heal: Civic Design in the Aftermath of Tragedy
November 17, 2022
"People were pushed but had no idea what was expected from them — adaptability was lacking."
Niko LaitinenAdaptable Org Design for Resilient Times
June 10, 2021
