Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
This presentation addresses the contextuality problem of generating rich yet generalizable observations. It examines the contrasting approaches of qualitative and quantitative research in capturing user context and offers a pragmatic model for building meaningful connections between the two methods using the concepts of the 'context of discovery' and 'contexts of justification.
Key Insights
-
•
Context in research is complex, multi-dimensional, and dynamic rather than stable and easily separable from phenomena.
-
•
Quantitative research treats context as a container to abstract away complexity for generalizability, focusing on a few controlled variables.
-
•
Qualitative research embraces context's fluidity and social construction to generate thick, contextualized understanding but faces challenges in broader generalization.
-
•
Balancing uncertainty (lack of information) and complexity (too much information) is a core challenge in combining qual and quant research.
-
•
Popper’s distinction between context of discovery (qual, inductive) and context of justification (quant, deductive) offers a pragmatic framework for integrating methods.
-
•
Rich qualitative data helps explain why and how phenomena occur, complementing quantitative data that identifies what is happening.
-
•
Pragmatism prioritizes practical utility over philosophical differences in epistemology when mixing research paradigms.
-
•
Innovation and detecting weak signals benefit from qualitative probing and quantitative detection of anomalies.
-
•
User behaviors, especially informal workarounds and innovations, are often invisible to purely quantitative measures but revealed through qualitative methods.
-
•
Multiple stakeholders in real-world contexts have divergent interests, making perfect solutions rare; negotiation and social intelligence are essential.
Notable Quotes
"In research, it depends; it’s never yes or no — it really depends on the context and the job."
"The AI system might excel at narrow tasks, but putting things into context — especially tone and holistic understanding — is uniquely human."
"Context is not a container; it’s a continuous, incomplete duality with the people who inhabit it."
"Quantitative research seeks parsimonious models — simple, generalizable explanations that often lose deeper contextual uncertainty."
"Qualitative research embraces complexity, generating thick descriptions to capture as much context as possible without aiming for generalization."
"The phenomenon of interest cannot be separated from the context in qualitative research because everything is interconnected."
"The question is not about which paradigm is right, but what works best pragmatically for the problem at hand."
"Innovation often happens in informal workarounds and practices invisible to quantitative data but visible through qualitative observation."
"There’s no perfect truth or solution; it’s about negotiation and deciding what’s good enough for the stakeholders we serve."
"If we balance qualitative depth and quantitative breadth, we get a yin-yang harmony that strengthens research and practice."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The AI is looking through material and that material’s changing every day."
Daniel J. RosenbergDesigning with and for Artificial Intelligence
August 11, 2022
"A key metric for a successful design system is how early the design system team is invited into project conversations."
Dan Mall“Ask Me Anything” with Dan Mall, Author of Upcoming Rosenfeld Title, Design that Scales
October 2, 2023
"Changing culture is hard because we’re willing to change actions but resistant to changing beliefs."
Peter MorvilleThe Architecture of Understanding
May 13, 2015
"Gunshots were a routine sound growing up. We became numb to it."
Kyria Stephens Marlon KernerPower to Heal: Civic Design in the Aftermath of Tragedy
November 17, 2022
"Most business tools focus on quantitative value and are terrible at capturing qualitative value, where design lives."
Nathan ShedroffRedefining Value: Bridging the Innovation Culture Divide
May 14, 2015
"What does ‘best work’ mean? It’s different for everyone, so our solutions have to be flexible and meaningful."
Kim Fellman CohenMeasuring the Designer Experience
October 23, 2019
"Feedback is data, not personal — once you view it that way, it feels less like criticism and more like improvement information."
Bria Alexander Laura Gatewood Corey Long Daniel Orbach Laine Prokay Deanna SmithThe Big Question about Resilience: A panel discussion
September 23, 2024
"Thank you to our sponsors, we could not do this conference without you."
Bria Alexander Louis RosenfeldOpening Remarks Day 2
March 26, 2024
"Our approach to career development is thinking about two dimensions: what you’re good at and enjoy, and what you’re good at but don’t enjoy."
Changying (Z) ZhengPractical DesignOps: From Ideas to Tools That Teams Actually Use
September 25, 2025
