Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
This presentation addresses the contextuality problem of generating rich yet generalizable observations. It examines the contrasting approaches of qualitative and quantitative research in capturing user context and offers a pragmatic model for building meaningful connections between the two methods using the concepts of the 'context of discovery' and 'contexts of justification.
Key Insights
-
•
Context in research is complex, multi-dimensional, and dynamic rather than stable and easily separable from phenomena.
-
•
Quantitative research treats context as a container to abstract away complexity for generalizability, focusing on a few controlled variables.
-
•
Qualitative research embraces context's fluidity and social construction to generate thick, contextualized understanding but faces challenges in broader generalization.
-
•
Balancing uncertainty (lack of information) and complexity (too much information) is a core challenge in combining qual and quant research.
-
•
Popper’s distinction between context of discovery (qual, inductive) and context of justification (quant, deductive) offers a pragmatic framework for integrating methods.
-
•
Rich qualitative data helps explain why and how phenomena occur, complementing quantitative data that identifies what is happening.
-
•
Pragmatism prioritizes practical utility over philosophical differences in epistemology when mixing research paradigms.
-
•
Innovation and detecting weak signals benefit from qualitative probing and quantitative detection of anomalies.
-
•
User behaviors, especially informal workarounds and innovations, are often invisible to purely quantitative measures but revealed through qualitative methods.
-
•
Multiple stakeholders in real-world contexts have divergent interests, making perfect solutions rare; negotiation and social intelligence are essential.
Notable Quotes
"In research, it depends; it’s never yes or no — it really depends on the context and the job."
"The AI system might excel at narrow tasks, but putting things into context — especially tone and holistic understanding — is uniquely human."
"Context is not a container; it’s a continuous, incomplete duality with the people who inhabit it."
"Quantitative research seeks parsimonious models — simple, generalizable explanations that often lose deeper contextual uncertainty."
"Qualitative research embraces complexity, generating thick descriptions to capture as much context as possible without aiming for generalization."
"The phenomenon of interest cannot be separated from the context in qualitative research because everything is interconnected."
"The question is not about which paradigm is right, but what works best pragmatically for the problem at hand."
"Innovation often happens in informal workarounds and practices invisible to quantitative data but visible through qualitative observation."
"There’s no perfect truth or solution; it’s about negotiation and deciding what’s good enough for the stakeholders we serve."
"If we balance qualitative depth and quantitative breadth, we get a yin-yang harmony that strengthens research and practice."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Helen will bridge AI/ML towards engaging with data scientists to augment humanity with complex data."
Uday GajendarTheme Four Intro
June 6, 2023
"Academic Purists believe one size fits all, ignoring context and stifling innovation."
Jason Mesut Martina Hodges-Schell Jose CoronadoUnmasking Design Leadership: Navigating leadership without neglecting ourselves
October 30, 2025
"You need to be the connector between people trying to drive decisions and others influencing them."
Nathan CurtisBeyond the Toolkit: Spreading a System Across People & Products
June 9, 2016
"Democratization is not research anarchy where anybody can talk to any customer for any reason with no oversight."
Jemma Ahmed Steve Carrod Chris Geison Dr. Shadi Janansefat Christopher NashDemocratization: Working with it, not against it [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
July 24, 2024
"If we can teach government partners to be product thinkers, that results in impact that lasts beyond contracts."
Ivana NgLevel Up Your Program with ProductOps
January 8, 2024
"With cloud apps, users don’t get to choose when to upgrade, which challenges maintaining accessibility continuity."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
November 18, 2022
"Warmth needs scale; if a group is too large, social warmth can break down."
Daniel GloydDesigning Warmth
February 26, 2025
"Trust erodes very quickly the moment an AI prediction is a little off or wrong."
Helen ArmstrongAugment the Human. Interrogate the System.
June 7, 2023
"Involving non-researchers firsthand helps them understand research’s complexity and when to bring in experts."
Kathleen AsjesResearch Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
March 10, 2022
