Designing for Disability, Innovating for Everyone
Summary
As UX researchers, you already know that including people with disabilities in your research isn’t just about accessibility, it’s about unlocking innovation. But what does that look like in practice? And what happens when inclusive design is left out? In this session, Samuel Proulx, Accessibility Evangelist at Fable, will take you beyond theory and into the real-world impact of inclusive research. Through compelling examples, like how people with disabilities forever changed the way we read, or how a lack of inclusive input led to autocorrects embarrassing (and sometimes harmful) errors, you’ll see how accessibility-driven insights shape the products we use every day. Whether you’re refining your research methods or making the case for inclusive design in your organization, this session will equip you with actionable strategies to ensure your work leads to products that don’t just meet compliance, they change the game. Join us to learn how accessibility fuels innovation, and how you can be part of it.
Key Insights
-
•
People with disabilities represent a diverse and growing user base including physical, sensory, cognitive challenges, and aging populations.
-
•
Audiobooks originated from the blind community’s need and sparked complex questions about what constitutes 'reading' and who should narrate.
-
•
The early iteration of audiobooks emphasized straight, uninflected reading, whereas today’s versions employ expressive narration.
-
•
Autocorrect was originally invented at MIT to address cognitive challenges but had a major flaw due to focus on a single user’s patterns.
-
•
Despite decades of development, autocorrect frequently fails to accommodate non-Western names, further marginalizing diverse users.
-
•
The touchscreen’s modern multi-finger gestures were invented by researchers designing for people with disabilities, not the general market.
-
•
Finger Works’ innovations like pinch-to-zoom and multi-finger swipe directly influenced Apple’s iPhone UI.
-
•
Early touchscreen devices suffered from 'gorilla arm' fatigue, showing the need for ergonomic research rooted in real user needs.
-
•
Research should be conducted with people with disabilities to leverage their lived expertise and avoid misguided assumptions.
-
•
Accessibility is both an ethical mandate and a significant untapped market opportunity waiting to be unlocked.
Notable Quotes
"The mother of invention is necessity originally said by William Horman in 1519."
"If you think about the baby boomer generation, they are getting older, but their reliance on technology is not decreasing."
"May I ask you what you think of printing books for the blind on phonograph records?"
"For those of us who are blind, braille is very costly to make, bulky, and slow to read compared to audio."
"DWI should stand for damn Warren's infertile machine because it was designed on Warren’s typos to solve Warren’s problem."
"41 percent of non-Western names are autocorrected into something else."
"Early touchscreen technology was considered useless and suffered from gorilla arm fatigue."
"John Elias and Wayne Westerman founded Finger Works to create technology useful for people with repetitive strain injury."
"Research with people with disabilities is about finding solutions with us, not for us."
"When you tap into the expertise that people with disabilities have developed over lifetimes, you will find problems to solve and solutions to use."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Previously, IBM designers were inventing their own buttons for every product, which exasperated chaos and inconsistency."
Mitchell BernsteinOrganizing Chaos: How IBM is Defining Design Systems with Sketch for an Ever-Changing AI Landscape
September 29, 2021
"The difference between director and principal often lies in whether you’re inspired more by leading people or focused on outputs and craft."
Catt Small Micah Bennett Brian Carr Jessica HarlleeWhat's Next for ICs: Exploring Staff and Principal Designer Roles
February 22, 2024
"When you do radical participatory research, the process becomes an educational one—for researchers and community members alike."
Victor UdoewaRadical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes
March 9, 2022
"We’re really leaving half of our data on the table by not attending to gesture when eliciting mental models."
Dane DeSutter Stephanie ScopelitisWhat co-speech gestures reveal about users’ thinking during interviews
June 30, 2023
"If we think about accelerating learning velocity, it's about creating specific altitudes of research questions to answer for the organization."
Jen Cardello Dr. Shadi Janansefat Alex WrightCurating insight: Strategies for integrating knowledge across research functions
March 11, 2025
"Having DPMs report separately from design managers creates a therapist-like safe space for designers to share issues."
Brennan HartichCommunicating and Establishing DesignOps as a New Function
November 7, 2018
"Showing citations in AI responses helps people develop trust and understand where answers come from."
Luke WroblewskiDesigning AI Applications
March 5, 2026
"Focus groups reveal subconscious behaviors and non-verbal cues that individual interviews might miss."
Taiye Akin-AkinyosoyeAmplifying voices and enhancing user research through group interviews
March 12, 2025
"Regular surveys showed teaching quality mattered 11%, but logistic regression revealed it actually represents 77% of the decision."
Ricardo MartinsUnlocking the power of advanced quantitative methods
March 12, 2025
