Summary
Have you ever been a part of a participatory research process or the use of a participatory method only to find that it fell short of any real shift of power dynamics? Have you ever compared notes with another participatory design researcher only to find out their definition of participatory research and design is different than your own? Have you faced opposition from your organization in practicing research in a more participatory way? What does research even mean, what is its purpose, and how does research change from community to community, context to context? Based on that, what are the future possibilities of research? Come, join the conversation, and see what Victor Udoewa has to say about such experiences, the different definitions of participatory research and how participatory research can actually be used to reinforce hierarchies. One way he has found to dismantle that system is to practice radical participatory research. He will share what that means, how it looks, and how you can begin moving in that direction along with a direct challenge to our community of researchers in regards to our own power.
Key Insights
-
•
Participatory research is an ancient practice predating modern academia, evidenced in traditions like seed braiding in West Africa and shaman apprenticeships worldwide.
-
•
Conventional participatory research often reinforces power hierarchies by centering professional researchers as facilitators and decision-makers.
-
•
Radical participatory research requires community members to outnumber researchers, lead all aspects of research, and own the outcomes and narratives.
-
•
Giving up power, rather than empowering others, is crucial to avoid perpetuating existing hierarchies in research.
-
•
Embodied experiential knowledge from community members is often more valuable than institutional knowledge and should be prioritized.
-
•
Radical participatory research embeds trauma-responsive practices more effectively by involving community members with lived experience.
-
•
Ethical remuneration must consider equity, compensating community members fairly based on their sacrifices, not just equally.
-
•
Radical participatory research blurs the lines between research and design, emphasizing non-linear co-creation driven by community needs.
-
•
Systems and futures thinking are more accessible when communities lead, shifting focus from deficit-based to asset-based, desire-driven approaches.
-
•
Sustainable shifts in power among team members indicate the success of radical participatory research beyond just project outcomes.
Notable Quotes
"When we empower others, we are actually reinforcing the hierarchy we seek to subvert."
"Community members are always participating and always leading, and they may invite professional researchers up to equal participation and equitable co-leadership."
"Cultural and experiential knowledge are greater than institutional knowledge."
"Empathy is an impossibility when there is inherent power imbalance between researcher and participant."
"If the community is truly leading, you shouldn’t have anyone on the research team who doesn’t want to be there."
"The pace of radical participatory research must match the pace of availability, trust, and relationship."
"The community owns the artifacts and outcomes, as well as the narratives around those outcomes."
"There are many ways to compensate people, but it is not your choice—it is theirs."
"Have a majority of the research team members experienced a sustained and sustainable shift in power?"
"When you do radical participatory research, the process becomes an educational one—for researchers and community members alike."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If you’re doing research with people with disabilities, consider using the Accessible Usability Scale to get more accurate insights."
Sam ProulxSUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
December 9, 2021
"It's kind of Peace Corps for nerds – people come in for a tour and try to have impact at scale."
Michael LandEstablishing Design Operations in Government
February 18, 2021
"Going from 100 to 200 people, suddenly product managers started hearing from a dozen people a week with conflicting requests."
Shipra KayanHow we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up
September 30, 2021
"If you’re amazing at your job but no one listens to your research or design, does it really have impact?"
Ian SwinsonDesigning and Driving UX Careers
June 8, 2016
"Communication is an integral part of the chief of staff role, whether with leadership, the org, or partners."
Isaac HeyveldExpand DesignOps Leadership as a Chief of Staff
September 8, 2022
"We categorized all our work into may-do, must-do, and desire-to-do buckets to better allocate our efforts."
Amy EvansHow to Create Change
September 25, 2024
"Teleportation lets us move throughout the organization by building tools that gather disparate data for real-time decision making."
Kate Koch Prateek KalliFlex Your Super Powers: When a Design Ops Team Scales to Power CX
September 30, 2021
"Change only happens in the present moment, not the past or future."
Dave GrayLiminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
May 14, 2015
"Providing immediate tactical value is the big one for just-in-time curation."
Matt DuignanAtomizing Research: Trend or Trap
March 30, 2020
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How does Kenneth justify the impact of his academic path on the UX community despite leaving direct practice?
How can psychological safety boost trust and initiative within product teams?
How can design leaders use reflection and conversation to balance their time, confidence, and enjoyment in leadership responsibilities?