Rosenverse
Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes

Gold
Wednesday, March 9, 2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Share the love for this talk
Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes
Speakers: Victor Udoewa
Link:

Summary

Have you ever been a part of a participatory research process or the use of a participatory method only to find that it fell short of any real shift of power dynamics? Have you ever compared notes with another participatory design researcher only to find out their definition of participatory research and design is different than your own? Have you faced opposition from your organization in practicing research in a more participatory way? What does research even mean, what is its purpose, and how does research change from community to community, context to context? Based on that, what are the future possibilities of research?

Come, join the conversation, and see what Victor Udoewa has to say about such experiences, the different definitions of participatory research and how participatory research can actually be used to reinforce hierarchies. One way he has found to dismantle that system is to practice radical participatory research. He will share what that means, how it looks, and how you can begin moving in that direction along with a direct challenge to our community of researchers in regards to our own power.

Key Insights

  • •

    Participatory research is an ancient practice predating modern academia, evidenced in traditions like seed braiding in West Africa and shaman apprenticeships worldwide.

  • •

    Conventional participatory research often reinforces power hierarchies by centering professional researchers as facilitators and decision-makers.

  • •

    Radical participatory research requires community members to outnumber researchers, lead all aspects of research, and own the outcomes and narratives.

  • •

    Giving up power, rather than empowering others, is crucial to avoid perpetuating existing hierarchies in research.

  • •

    Embodied experiential knowledge from community members is often more valuable than institutional knowledge and should be prioritized.

  • •

    Radical participatory research embeds trauma-responsive practices more effectively by involving community members with lived experience.

  • •

    Ethical remuneration must consider equity, compensating community members fairly based on their sacrifices, not just equally.

  • •

    Radical participatory research blurs the lines between research and design, emphasizing non-linear co-creation driven by community needs.

  • •

    Systems and futures thinking are more accessible when communities lead, shifting focus from deficit-based to asset-based, desire-driven approaches.

  • •

    Sustainable shifts in power among team members indicate the success of radical participatory research beyond just project outcomes.

Notable Quotes

"When we empower others, we are actually reinforcing the hierarchy we seek to subvert."

"Community members are always participating and always leading, and they may invite professional researchers up to equal participation and equitable co-leadership."

"Cultural and experiential knowledge are greater than institutional knowledge."

"Empathy is an impossibility when there is inherent power imbalance between researcher and participant."

"If the community is truly leading, you shouldn’t have anyone on the research team who doesn’t want to be there."

"The pace of radical participatory research must match the pace of availability, trust, and relationship."

"The community owns the artifacts and outcomes, as well as the narratives around those outcomes."

"There are many ways to compensate people, but it is not your choice—it is theirs."

"Have a majority of the research team members experienced a sustained and sustainable shift in power?"

"When you do radical participatory research, the process becomes an educational one—for researchers and community members alike."

Ask the Rosenbot
Amy Evans
How to Create Change
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
Closing Words
2026 • Shift UX 2026
Conference
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Changying (Z) Zheng
From prototype to production: Vibe coding design for real engineering systems
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Gold
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Jorge Arango
Exploding the Notebook: How to Unlock the Power of Linked Notes (2nd of 3 seminars)
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Robert Fabricant
A Genuine Conversation about the Future of UX Research
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Peter Van Dijck
Hands on AI #3: Claude Code for UX people
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Marina Martin
Lives on the Line: The Stakes of UX at the Scale of Government
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Laura Schaefer
DesignOps: A Conduit for Inclusion
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Charlotte Lee
Theme 1 Intro
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Peter Van Dijck
Building the Rosenbot
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
Opening Remarks
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Rachel Posman
A Closer Look at Team Ops and Product Ops (Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin)
2020 • DesignOps Community
Saara Kamppari-Miller
Inclusive Design is DesignOps
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Molly Fargotstein
Multipurpose Communication & UX Research Marketing
2019 • DesignOps Community

More Videos

Daniel Korczynski

"AI has this strange weakness that when working with a large dataset, they often miss crucial, subtle findings."

Daniel Korczynski

Why AI Is Bad at Research (and how to make it actually useful)

March 10, 2026

Bas Raijmakers, PhD (RCA)

"Different stakeholders interpret stories differently, and those conversations are valuable for deeper understanding."

Bas Raijmakers, PhD (RCA) Charley Scull Prabhas Pokharel

What Design Research can Learn from Documentary Filmmaking

March 11, 2022

Yalenka Mariën

"Inclusive civic design doesn’t mean only designers should do it; it requires ambassadors across policy, business, tech, and communications."

Yalenka Mariën Marie Mervaillie

Designing for Digital Inclusion in the Belgian Government

December 8, 2021

Jake Burghardt

"Too often research lives in silos, making it hard to connect the dots across streams."

Jake Burghardt

Stop wasting research: Unlock more value from research insights

June 24, 2025

Vincent Brathwaite

"The future of medicine will be written in algorithms if we let it."

Vincent Brathwaite

Opener: Past, Present, and Future—Closing the Racial Divide in Design Teams

October 22, 2020

Christian Crumlish

"We are not just designing for people anymore. We're designing for people and the agents that are working alongside them."

Christian Crumlish Erika Flowers Benjamin Jackson Adekunle Oduye

From tools to staff: What the next generation of agents means for the future of design

June 10, 2026

Adrian Howard

"If somebody tells me agile is wonderful and my only experience is a feature factory, it’s hard to take them seriously."

Adrian Howard

Sturgeon’s Biases

September 25, 2024

Megan Clegg

"Situational use cases help us consider the realities outside the business problem that impact user success."

Megan Clegg Michael Haggerty-Villa Alexis Morin

Space for Everyone: Reframing Accessibility Through a Wider Lens

June 10, 2021

Mike Davidson

"You have to find your champion as high up in the company as possible to push for research and equitable pay."

Mike Davidson

Fireside Chat

March 11, 2022