Summary
Karen recounts how she helped grow GE Healthcare's design group from 28 to 60 people by acting as internal consultants across GE divisions during tough economic times. She partnered with design firms like Intersection to develop journey mapping tools and emphasized the involvement of business stakeholders alongside designers. On hiring the first diverse or non-traditional candidates, Karen stresses early alignment on criteria and seeking external community support to fairly evaluate and onboard these hires. Sam highlights the importance of using user research to pitch UX value in legacy-technical environments, leveraging real user frustrations captured in quotes and videos to create empathy and buy-in from skeptical stakeholders. Both underline the significance of focusing on measurable task success, error rates, confidence, and user delight when evaluating UX outcomes. They also share lessons from organizing “delight forums” aimed at building shared UX language inside organizations, noting their inspirational but limited practical impact. The conversation provides actionable strategies for scaling UX teams, engaging stakeholders, and making user-centered design tangible in complex, technical enterprises.
Key Insights
-
•
GE Healthcare's design group grew by acting as internal consultants to other GE divisions, funding growth through cross-unit projects.
-
•
Journey mapping was developed in partnership with an external firm, Intersection, to gain fresh perspectives on the user experience.
-
•
Involving business stakeholders alongside designers in journey mapping creates better alignment and broader buy-in.
-
•
Hiring non-traditional candidates requires early alignment on hiring criteria and leveraging external professional design communities.
-
•
Measuring UX success focuses on task completion rates, number of errors, user confidence, and subjective delight.
-
•
Physiological metrics for emotional responses in UX research have limited signal in everyday software usage due to noise.
-
•
“Delight forums” help build shared UX language but have limited impact without translating conversation into action.
-
•
Using authentic user stories and recorded frustrations can be more persuasive than abstract UX arguments when pitching to stakeholders.
-
•
Finding an internal ‘unindicted co-conspirator’ with a real problem helps UX designers demonstrate value practically.
-
•
Focus on where you’re welcomed in an organization to build momentum rather than forcing change where you face resistance.
Notable Quotes
"When I got there in very late ’07, there were about 28 people, now there’s about 60."
"We became entrepreneurs internally, doing work across other GE divisions to generate funding."
"Journey mapping was created with Intersection, founded by Chuck Pelley and Joan Greger, to help us look in the mirror."
"Align on what you’re looking for before the interview to evaluate non-traditional candidates fairly."
"We used standard metrics like task success, time to complete, number of errors, confidence, and delight."
"It’s hard to detect emotional responses physiologically in day-to-day software use because there’s too much noise."
"Delight forums helped us share stories and build a shared vernacular but didn’t lead to significant change by themselves."
"Instead of telling the story, bring in actual users to tell their frustration directly to your team and execs."
"Find an unindicted co-conspirator in your company with a problem you can help solve, and the rest will follow."
"Ignore the people who hate you, embrace those who love you, and focus on the fence sitters."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Measuring impact means linking research insights back to decisions and how they affect roadmaps and priorities."
Ned Dwyer Emily Stewart James WallisThe Intersection of Design and ResearchOps
September 24, 2024
"There is no such thing as a single issue struggle because we do not live single issue lives."
Angelos ArnisNavigating the Rapid Shifts in Tech's Turbulent Terrain
October 2, 2023
"We emphasized a simple one-button workflow with manual editing and regeneration to handle inevitable AI errors."
Jennifer KongJourneying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare
June 5, 2024
"The companies that will attract talent moving forward are those that are most flexible and give people choices."
Alla WeinbergWorkers Are Sick of Change: The Cure is Psychological Safety
June 6, 2023
"We have to think about who is our audience. That’s not going to change because of AI."
Tom Armitage Carla Diana Kanene Ayo HolderDay 2 Panel: Looking ahead: Designing with AI in 2026
June 11, 2025
"Don’t be afraid to keep knocking on their door or follow up, even if there are too many messages to answer in a day."
Laura SchaeferDesignOps: A Conduit for Inclusion
September 9, 2022
"Too often research lives in silos, making it hard to connect the dots across streams."
Jake BurghardtStop wasting research: Unlock more value from research insights
June 24, 2025
"But what’s the so what? Get to the point and don’t make me wait."
Megan BlockerGetting to the “So What?”: How Management Consulting Practices Can Transform Your Approach to Research
March 26, 2024
"The interaction comes to the foreground mainly when there’s a negotiation of intentionality between the user and the technology."
Lukas Moro“Feels Like Paper!”: Interfacing AI through Paper
June 11, 2025
