How Your Organization's Generative Workshops Are Probably Going Wrong and How to Get Them Right
Summary
Contrary to popular belief, a design sprint is a highly structured and carefully designed series of exercises, not a brainstorm, design jam or free-for-all. The whole point is to drive a cross-functional team to the right outcome, and this requires a set of structured exercises which weave the thread of user needs, behaviors and attitudes throughout. This involves more than reviewing the research at the start and then moving on to create without that research in context.
A true design sprint takes us from user insights -- even broad user insights -- to user-evaluated concepts or designs. The generative phase of a product is deeply impactful, and design sprints are a fantastic tool for driving this needed impact. However, many are practicing brainstorms or design jams rather than true design sprints. One can make a mismatched concept extremely usable throughout the product development process, but that will not remedy the fact that it is not the right concept.
Researchers are ideal design sprint organizers and facilitators, but researchers are sometimes not even considered a critical component of the sprint. It's important for knowledgeable researchers to drive design sprint impact.
Key Insights
-
•
Many generative workshops fail due to fundamental mistakes more often than they succeed.
-
•
The 'Sprint as theater' mistake occurs when workshops are done for appearances or political reasons rather than genuine product development.
-
•
Well-structured workshops with specific exercises are crucial to move from research data to human-centered product concepts.
-
•
Integrating research both before and after a workshop grounds concepts in real human needs and allows recovery if initial research is missing.
-
•
Excluding key decision-makers leads to surprise blockers after workshops and risks misalignment with product goals.
-
•
Facilitation is a distinct, practiced skill essential to managing group dynamics, pacing, and adapting exercises during workshops.
-
•
Scaling back workshops too much compromises their effectiveness and the quality of resulting concepts.
-
•
Explicit communication about workshop outcomes and quality is necessary to help stakeholders appreciate the method's value.
-
•
Training facilitators in focused, incremental sessions delivers practical skills necessary for leading effective workshops.
-
•
Ensuring equal participation requires setting clear engagement rules and providing tool training to accommodate varying skill levels.
Notable Quotes
"The outcome of this method really makes the difference between lightning and a lightning bug."
"Sprint as theater is not going to result in a product concept that really represents human needs, behaviors, and attitudes."
"If there is no structured way to move from data to concept, you often end up with just a brainstorm, not a grounded concept."
"Lack of research before or after the workshop can be recovered from but at some cost to the concept’s validity."
"Excluding key people might save time but it often leads to surprise blockers and misaligned decisions later on."
"Facilitation is a skill that takes real practice; it’s about managing personalities, stamina, and knowing when to adapt exercises."
"There is a point where scaling back a workshop too much will make it ineffective and that trade-off must be explicit."
"Many stakeholders don’t inherently understand the difference in quality outcomes from workshops, so we must be explicit."
"Getting to know what people care about in the organization helps tailor workshops to support those goals and gain buy-in."
"It’s important to create a sincere environment where everyone feels they can equally participate, regardless of title or skill level."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The Rosenbot chatbot is trained on all Rosenfeld content and is amazingly useful for answering your questions."
Louis RosenfeldAbout the Rosenverse
March 15, 2026
"Futures thinking is not about predicting the future, but about being smarter about anticipating risks and consequences of our actions today."
Ilana LipsettAnticipating Risk, Regulating Tech: A Playbook for Ethical Technology Governance
December 10, 2021
"AI and automation have meaningfully raised the bar for how I operate as an ops."
Aletheia DelivreNew Shapes and Emerging Identities for Design Ops
September 11, 2025
"SmartSheet magic is really just frosty if statement formulas connecting 75 columns of metadata."
Kristin Sundermeyer Tygre MorehartDesign Ops Metrics
September 30, 2021
"The official conference time zone is Pacific Daylight Time, but you can adjust it based on where you are."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
March 28, 2023
"The automatic soap dispenser was designed based on a bias by standard and distributed widely with the bystandard."
Candace MyersStandardizing Design at Scale
September 9, 2022
"DPMs can get overwhelmed quickly because they want to say yes to everything; managers must help say no."
Courtney KaplanTaking it to the next level: Career paths in DesignOps
November 8, 2018
"One of my biggest pet peeves is biased questions; I hate the term validation, I prefer evaluation."
Mike OrenImproving Democratized Research with CustomGPTs and Gems
February 25, 2026
"At NASA, we had to start AI readiness strategy with workshops led by David Salvinini, the chief artificial intelligence officer."
Erika FlowersThe Handoff is Dead: Design-Led Engineering with AI Agents
March 4, 2026
