Summary
Generative workshops are a critical generative component of any product development process. But in my 20+ years conducting product user research, I have seen more product harm come from so-called "workshops" or "design sprints" than good. In this tutorial, I will share more about my experience and what I've found are critical components of generative workshops -- whether they last five hours or five days. Contrary to popular belief, a design sprint is a highly structured and carefully designed series of exercises, not a brainstorm, design jam or free-for-all. The whole point is to drive a cross-functional team to the right outcome, and this requires a set of structured exercises which weave the thread of user needs, behaviors and attitudes throughout. This involves more than reviewing the research at the start and then moving on to create without that research in context. A true design sprint takes us from user insights -- even broad user insights -- to user-evaluated concepts or designs. The generative phase of a product is deeply impactful, and design sprints are a fantastic tool for driving this needed impact. However, many are practicing brainstorms or design jams rather than true design sprints. One can make a mismatched concept extremely usable throughout the product development process, but that will not remedy the fact that it is not the right concept. Researchers are ideal design sprint organizers and facilitators, but researchers are sometimes not even considered a critical component of the sprint. It's important for knowledgeable researchers to drive design sprint impact.
Key Insights
-
•
Many generative workshops fail due to fundamental mistakes more often than they succeed.
-
•
The 'Sprint as theater' mistake occurs when workshops are done for appearances or political reasons rather than genuine product development.
-
•
Well-structured workshops with specific exercises are crucial to move from research data to human-centered product concepts.
-
•
Integrating research both before and after a workshop grounds concepts in real human needs and allows recovery if initial research is missing.
-
•
Excluding key decision-makers leads to surprise blockers after workshops and risks misalignment with product goals.
-
•
Facilitation is a distinct, practiced skill essential to managing group dynamics, pacing, and adapting exercises during workshops.
-
•
Scaling back workshops too much compromises their effectiveness and the quality of resulting concepts.
-
•
Explicit communication about workshop outcomes and quality is necessary to help stakeholders appreciate the method's value.
-
•
Training facilitators in focused, incremental sessions delivers practical skills necessary for leading effective workshops.
-
•
Ensuring equal participation requires setting clear engagement rules and providing tool training to accommodate varying skill levels.
Notable Quotes
"The outcome of this method really makes the difference between lightning and a lightning bug."
"Sprint as theater is not going to result in a product concept that really represents human needs, behaviors, and attitudes."
"If there is no structured way to move from data to concept, you often end up with just a brainstorm, not a grounded concept."
"Lack of research before or after the workshop can be recovered from but at some cost to the concept’s validity."
"Excluding key people might save time but it often leads to surprise blockers and misaligned decisions later on."
"Facilitation is a skill that takes real practice; it’s about managing personalities, stamina, and knowing when to adapt exercises."
"There is a point where scaling back a workshop too much will make it ineffective and that trade-off must be explicit."
"Many stakeholders don’t inherently understand the difference in quality outcomes from workshops, so we must be explicit."
"Getting to know what people care about in the organization helps tailor workshops to support those goals and gain buy-in."
"It’s important to create a sincere environment where everyone feels they can equally participate, regardless of title or skill level."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Good design is good business."
Doug PowellClosing Keynote: Design at Scale
November 8, 2018
"A growth mindset in research means being ready to adapt protocols based on what actually works with participants."
Mila Kuznetsova Lucy DentonHow Lessons Learned from Our Youngest Users Can Help Us Evolve our Practices
March 9, 2022
"We created a Wizard of Oz smoke and mirrors prototype—a simple text message thread between a parent and this service—just to get enough buy-in."
Sarah GallimoreInspire Progress with Artifacts from the Future
November 18, 2022
"Junior team members don’t have to talk directly to executives; working effectively with peers can create grassroots buy-in."
Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne RogondinoTheme 1: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"AI is here to stay, challenging our norms and shaping our future."
Alnie FigueroaThe Future of Design Operations: Transforming Our Craft
September 10, 2025
"You shouldn’t send another survey unless you’ve implemented changes and allowed time for behavior to adapt."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"It’s the worst thing when someone feels dumb in front of a customer because the tools don’t support them."
Emily EagleCan't Rewind: Radio and Retail
June 3, 2019
"There is no solid way to control the course of your re-platforming project; being flexible is essential."
Malini RaoLessons Learned from a 4-year Product Re-platforming Journey
June 9, 2021
"Design is not just aesthetics; it’s about what the product feels like, sounds like, and how it differentiates in the market."
Asia HoePartnering with Product: A Journey from Junior to Senior Design
November 29, 2023
