It Takes GRIT: Lessons from the Small, but Mighty World of Civic Usability Testing
Summary
While usability testing is an often overlooked part of design in the frenzied race to get technology to market, it’s absence is especially problematic when it comes to civic-focused products and services. Even when designers want to test, options are often limited to "professional testers" or personal networks - far from the actual users they’re hoping to help. Testing with a diverse group of end users and stakeholders is the only surefire way to make sure what gets designed works for everyone, but the approach needs to be thoughtful, sensitive and impactful. Since launching in early 2019, GRIT has delivered more than 20 such inclusive usability testing engagements with partners in the public, private and nonprofit sectors and we’re eager to share our insights with others who endeavor to engage diverse, underrepresented communities in the design of their civic products and services. Using case studies and lessons from our trove of civic design engagements, we'll help take the guesswork out of inclusively testing your next design.
Key Insights
-
•
Inclusive usability testing uncovers user needs that would otherwise be missed, especially for vulnerable populations.
-
•
Building a diverse participant pool requires going offline to meet people in their everyday community spaces, not just digital recruitment.
-
•
Offering flexible testing times beyond standard working hours increases participation from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.
-
•
Creating a comfortable, informal testing environment with snacks and a non-intimidating setting improves honest feedback.
-
•
Clear, jargon-free communication and early sharing of consent forms build trust and reduce participant anxiety.
-
•
Maintaining a single point of contact for participants prevents confusion and fosters smoother coordination.
-
•
Compensation at a rate of $1 to $1.25 per minute, reimbursed travel, and prompt payments boost recruitment speed and retention.
-
•
Referrals from satisfied testers can help reach specific demographics and expand testing pools efficiently.
-
•
Longitudinal testing, involving participants multiple times, enhances insights as the product evolves.
-
•
Testing with real users who rely on assistive technologies, like screen readers or voice commands, validates accessibility effectively.
Notable Quotes
"If it doesn’t work for you, it doesn’t work."
"When you test inclusively, you’re learning about the people who will be directly impacted by your work, your users."
"Technology that includes everyone, especially those from vulnerable populations, ensures that what gets built will work for everyone."
"Participant experience is everything and it starts with building trust."
"No surprises. Tell participants everything they’ll be experiencing from who will be in the room to if the session will be recorded."
"Use plain language in all communication. No design or technology jargon."
"Build your pool, build your practice. If you provide a great testing experience, you’ve got another person to add to your group."
"Compensation is so important to thank people for their time, and you will definitely build your recruitment pool much faster if you offer it."
"We intentionally did not email listservs or go on Twitter because that would have delivered a group that is too tech-savvy."
"During testing sensitive subjects, have relevant resources at the ready, like shelter beds for participants in need."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Systems change happens at the human scale by making structures and humans visible so we can investigate and change them together."
Shanti Mathew Natalie Sims Natalia RadywylCivic Design at Scale: Introducing the Public Policy Layer Cake
December 9, 2021
"We need to reject the notion that work is our only identity."
Tess DixonC'mon Get Happy
September 29, 2021
"Product design roles today usually expect a mix of interaction design and visual design skills."
Dave Hoffer Joanne WeaverUX Job Search AMA #3 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
July 16, 2025
"Nobody’s going to ask to show you the $10,000 impact from a single design, but you can show the needle movement was there."
Louis Rosenfeld Jose Coronado Rachel Posman Guneet Singh Crystal YanThe Bigger Picture: A Panel Discussion
October 23, 2019
"You can be right without making others wrong by telling a story that respects their worldview."
Jon FukudaStorytelling for DesignOps
August 17, 2023
"Skin folk aren’t necessarily kinfolk — diversity doesn’t magically prevent inequitable research."
Jemma Ahmed Robert Fabricant Sean McKay Llewyn Paine Kate Towsey Noah BondTheme Panel
March 11, 2025
"Legislation like the US executive order on federal customer experience has helped us rebuild trust in government."
Kara KaneTheme One Intro
November 16, 2022
"I realized I had too much chart junk and cognitive load, and users are left to decode instead of understand."
Tristin OldaniLearning the Part I Used to Hand Off: How Building the Systems Made Me a Better Designer
August 20, 2026
"Users are smart, innovative, and a lot of the innovation actually comes from users rather than big companies."
Prayag Narula Rida QadriHCI 2.0: Humanity Deserves the Attention that UX Research has to Offer
March 28, 2023
