Summary
While usability testing is an often overlooked part of design in the frenzied race to get technology to market, it’s absence is especially problematic when it comes to civic-focused products and services. Even when designers want to test, options are often limited to "professional testers" or personal networks - far from the actual users they’re hoping to help. Testing with a diverse group of end users and stakeholders is the only surefire way to make sure what gets designed works for everyone, but the approach needs to be thoughtful, sensitive and impactful. Since launching in early 2019, GRIT has delivered more than 20 such inclusive usability testing engagements with partners in the public, private and nonprofit sectors and we’re eager to share our insights with others who endeavor to engage diverse, underrepresented communities in the design of their civic products and services. Using case studies and lessons from our trove of civic design engagements, we'll help take the guesswork out of inclusively testing your next design.
Key Insights
-
•
Inclusive usability testing uncovers user needs that would otherwise be missed, especially for vulnerable populations.
-
•
Building a diverse participant pool requires going offline to meet people in their everyday community spaces, not just digital recruitment.
-
•
Offering flexible testing times beyond standard working hours increases participation from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.
-
•
Creating a comfortable, informal testing environment with snacks and a non-intimidating setting improves honest feedback.
-
•
Clear, jargon-free communication and early sharing of consent forms build trust and reduce participant anxiety.
-
•
Maintaining a single point of contact for participants prevents confusion and fosters smoother coordination.
-
•
Compensation at a rate of $1 to $1.25 per minute, reimbursed travel, and prompt payments boost recruitment speed and retention.
-
•
Referrals from satisfied testers can help reach specific demographics and expand testing pools efficiently.
-
•
Longitudinal testing, involving participants multiple times, enhances insights as the product evolves.
-
•
Testing with real users who rely on assistive technologies, like screen readers or voice commands, validates accessibility effectively.
Notable Quotes
"If it doesn’t work for you, it doesn’t work."
"When you test inclusively, you’re learning about the people who will be directly impacted by your work, your users."
"Technology that includes everyone, especially those from vulnerable populations, ensures that what gets built will work for everyone."
"Participant experience is everything and it starts with building trust."
"No surprises. Tell participants everything they’ll be experiencing from who will be in the room to if the session will be recorded."
"Use plain language in all communication. No design or technology jargon."
"Build your pool, build your practice. If you provide a great testing experience, you’ve got another person to add to your group."
"Compensation is so important to thank people for their time, and you will definitely build your recruitment pool much faster if you offer it."
"We intentionally did not email listservs or go on Twitter because that would have delivered a group that is too tech-savvy."
"During testing sensitive subjects, have relevant resources at the ready, like shelter beds for participants in need."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If people just got in the room and I did nothing except take a seat, everything would be fine."
Alison Rand Sarah BrooksScaling Impact with Service Design
March 25, 2021
"Decision making here is basically forge trading — people argue and withhold support until they get what they want."
Carl TurnerYou Can Do This: Understand and Solve Organizational Problems to Jumpstart a Dead Project
March 28, 2023
"Systems Thinking can give us this new lens to think about research in the middle of complexity."
Sarah FlamionComplex Problem? Add Clarity by Combining Research and Systems Thinking
March 31, 2020
"Plans are useless, but planning is indispensable. You have to keep moving forwards even if the destination keeps changing."
Silke Bochat5 Antifragile Strategies for a DesignOps 2.0
September 23, 2024
"Designers must understand their domain deeply or risk being glorified production artists."
Uday Gajendar Lada Gorlenko Dave Malouf Louis Rosenfeld Dan Willis10 Years of Enterprise UX: Reflecting on the community and the practice
June 18, 2025
"Unfortunately, that was very good."
Dan WillisEnterprise Storytelling Sessions
June 8, 2017
"Having a monthly newsletter gave people one place to go instead of having to check Slack or emails all the time."
Kara KaneCommunities of Practice for Civic Design
April 7, 2022
"Our research practice was perceived largely as design testers, empathy vehicles, and policing functions — a narrow, reactive role."
Nalini KotamrajuResearch After UX
March 25, 2024
"Sponsor sessions are not sales pitches; they are super similar to the quality of the main conference session."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
October 1, 2021
