Summary
While usability testing is an often overlooked part of design in the frenzied race to get technology to market, it’s absence is especially problematic when it comes to civic-focused products and services. Even when designers want to test, options are often limited to "professional testers" or personal networks - far from the actual users they’re hoping to help. Testing with a diverse group of end users and stakeholders is the only surefire way to make sure what gets designed works for everyone, but the approach needs to be thoughtful, sensitive and impactful. Since launching in early 2019, GRIT has delivered more than 20 such inclusive usability testing engagements with partners in the public, private and nonprofit sectors and we’re eager to share our insights with others who endeavor to engage diverse, underrepresented communities in the design of their civic products and services. Using case studies and lessons from our trove of civic design engagements, we'll help take the guesswork out of inclusively testing your next design.
Key Insights
-
•
Inclusive usability testing uncovers user needs that would otherwise be missed, especially for vulnerable populations.
-
•
Building a diverse participant pool requires going offline to meet people in their everyday community spaces, not just digital recruitment.
-
•
Offering flexible testing times beyond standard working hours increases participation from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.
-
•
Creating a comfortable, informal testing environment with snacks and a non-intimidating setting improves honest feedback.
-
•
Clear, jargon-free communication and early sharing of consent forms build trust and reduce participant anxiety.
-
•
Maintaining a single point of contact for participants prevents confusion and fosters smoother coordination.
-
•
Compensation at a rate of $1 to $1.25 per minute, reimbursed travel, and prompt payments boost recruitment speed and retention.
-
•
Referrals from satisfied testers can help reach specific demographics and expand testing pools efficiently.
-
•
Longitudinal testing, involving participants multiple times, enhances insights as the product evolves.
-
•
Testing with real users who rely on assistive technologies, like screen readers or voice commands, validates accessibility effectively.
Notable Quotes
"If it doesn’t work for you, it doesn’t work."
"When you test inclusively, you’re learning about the people who will be directly impacted by your work, your users."
"Technology that includes everyone, especially those from vulnerable populations, ensures that what gets built will work for everyone."
"Participant experience is everything and it starts with building trust."
"No surprises. Tell participants everything they’ll be experiencing from who will be in the room to if the session will be recorded."
"Use plain language in all communication. No design or technology jargon."
"Build your pool, build your practice. If you provide a great testing experience, you’ve got another person to add to your group."
"Compensation is so important to thank people for their time, and you will definitely build your recruitment pool much faster if you offer it."
"We intentionally did not email listservs or go on Twitter because that would have delivered a group that is too tech-savvy."
"During testing sensitive subjects, have relevant resources at the ready, like shelter beds for participants in need."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Our general public, even advanced enterprise users, often struggle to interpret even the most basic charts."
Theresa NeilJust Build Me a Dashboard!
April 9, 2019
"Empathy is really just the floor, not the ceiling; it cannot replace someone's actual lived experience."
Sahibzada MayedThe Politics of Radical Research: A Manifesto
March 27, 2023
"You only pay for successfully completed sessions on User Interviews—no upfront cost, no fees for no-shows or cancellations."
Lily Aduana Savannah Hobbs Brittany Rutherford5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
March 12, 2021
"We resisted the temptation to squash diversity of usage because we thought we’d learn from it."
David CroninThe GE Design System and Thoughts about Craft at Scale
May 13, 2015
"We haven’t just invited them, we’ve set the damn table, and sometimes we have to host the damn party."
Jacqui Frey Alison RandSetting the Table for Dynamic Change
October 24, 2019
"AI-generated UX is not about replacing designers, but removing grunt work to focus on higher-order design."
Daniel J. RosenbergDesigning with and for Artificial Intelligence
August 11, 2022
"Automated tools find many issues at scale, but user testing finds problems those tools can't detect. They pair really nicely."
Kate KalcevichIntegrating Accessibility in DesignOps
September 23, 2024
"It’s more dangerous to do nothing than to do something that’s not super perfect to start."
Bob Baxley Sara Asche Anderson Sharon Bautista Frank Duran Jamie Kaspszak Abbey Smalley Sylas SouzaTheme 4: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"The Silicon Valley dream is a problematic ideology that normalizes what the correct research looks like and excludes others."
Verónica Urzúa Jorge MontielThe B-side of the Research Impact
March 12, 2021
