Key Insights

• •

  Participatory design predates modern history and is intertwined with the history of communities since ancient times.

• •

  Facilitation in participatory design perpetuates power imbalances by centralizing decision-making outside community presence.

• •

  Radical participatory design requires community members to be permanently present, to outnumber professionals, and to own outcomes and narratives.

• •

  Equal remuneration between community members and professional designers is ethically necessary and often requires paying community members more due to opportunity costs.

• •

  True empathy in design consists of intellectual, emotional, and compassionate empathy components, rarely fully achieved without embedding community members.

• •

  Trauma-responsive and pluralistic, asset-based design approaches are more naturally supported in radical participatory design frameworks.

• •

  Power shifts must be sustained and sustainable to evaluate if participatory design is truly radical rather than colonial or tokenistic.

• •

  Community members often already possess design and research skills, which designers can learn from when roles are equalized.

• •

  In participatory democracies, decisions about the degree of direct community involvement versus representative decision-making should be led by the community itself.

• •

  Future-oriented design methods help translate radical participatory intentions into practical, contextually feasible outcomes affected by resources and politics.

Notable Quotes