Rosenverse
[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings

Gold
Wednesday, June 5, 2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Share the love for this talk
[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings
Speakers: Llewyn Paine
Link:

Summary

Under biometric privacy laws like BIPA and CCPA, user research recordings containing users’ faces or voices can put your company at risk for lawsuits and fines. Legal departments are increasingly requiring more stringent redaction, and in some cases banning recording outright. This comes at a high cost for UX teams who are already being asked to do more with less, as losing access to recordings can increase duplicative research effort and reduce the accuracy of results. AI offers new solutions for UX teams who want to keep research recordings longer without violating biometric privacy laws. In this demo, we’ll show how we used off-the-shelf tools to intelligently redact users’ voices, faces, and bodies in research videos. By removing biometric identifiers, you can compliantly archive research recordings indefinitely, enabling your team to mine them for insights for years to come.

Key Insights

  • Biometric privacy laws increasingly restrict recording and retaining user faces and voices in UX research, risking large fines.

  • Replacing users with AI-generated avatars preserves the richness of user recordings while protecting privacy.

  • Wonder Studio can segment and animate a user's body and face with a 3D avatar fully automatically, simplifying production.

  • 11 Labs technology enables seamless voice replacement using AI-generated speech in user research videos.

  • Replacing the entire body, not just the face, mitigates risks from distinctive identifying marks like tattoos and future privacy laws.

  • Traditional redaction methods like blurring or keeping only transcripts are either insufficient or lose valuable context.

  • Current AI tools have usage limits, require legal reviews, and sometimes restrictive licensing affecting enterprise use.

  • Hosting AI models in-house offers more data control but adds technical complexity compared to cloud-based solutions.

  • Using synthetic avatars raises complex ethical questions about authenticity, identity representation, and users' rights to be forgotten.

  • Legal risk tolerance varies, so negotiating with legal teams is essential to implement AI avatar redaction in research workflows.

Notable Quotes

"User recordings are your most valuable asset but have become riskier due to biometric privacy laws."

"Even if you’re not doing facial recognition, storing face and voice data is under growing legal scrutiny."

"Blurring user faces loses context and doesn’t address voice privacy, making it an inadequate solution."

"Wonder Studio automatically segments actors, maps their movements to a 3D model, and renders a synthetic avatar video."

"Replacing the entire body with an avatar future-proofs against unanticipated identifiers like tattoos or moles."

"DeepFakes can look too realistic and might introduce new privacy risks if donor faces come from real people."

"Processing limits and licensing terms currently restrict how much video and audio these AI tools can handle."

"Ultimately, AI avatar tools offer UX teams options to keep recordings while meeting legal compliance."

"If you can’t see a human in a video, how do you know the entire conversation wasn’t fabricated?"

"Synthetic duplicates living on after data deletion raise ethical questions about users’ right to be forgotten."

Ask the Rosenbot
Nora Tejeda
Scaling Design Capabilities at BBVA Through a Self-service Design Model
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Sheri Byrne-Haber
The Importance of Accessible Design Systems
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Robin Cannon
AI means your design system can't suck anymore
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Teresa Swingler
Look, Up in the Sky! UX/UI for Aerospace
2022 • Enterprise Community
Megan Blocker
A Selectively Scrappy Approach to ResearchOps
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Joe Elmendorf
Shitty Maps: A Trojan Horse for Sensemaking
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Sam Ladner
How Research Can Drive Strategic Foresight
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Indra Klavins
A Design Ops Girl in a Dev Ops World
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Ari Zelmanow
Dark Side of Democratization
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Saara Kamppari-Miller
Theme Three Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Darian Davis
Lessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Chris Geison
Theme 1 Intro
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Sam Ladner
Data Exhaust and Personal Data: Learning from Consumer Products to Enhance Enterprise UX
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Maria Giudice
Remaking the Making Company: Moving from Product to Experience
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Kate Koch
Flex Your Super Powers: When a Design Ops Team Scales to Power CX
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Anil Dash
Designing with power in the age of AI
2026 • Designing with AI 2026
Gold

More Videos

Rachel Garb

"I wasn’t drawn to product work anymore because the fluid intelligence needed to navigate it felt out of reach."

Rachel Garb

Exit Interview #7: Facing a blank slate in retirement when constraints are all you’ve ever known

August 5, 2026

Kit Unger

"People may even forget why you are if you’re conversations that bring the best out of you as a human being."

Kit Unger Lada Gorlenko

Theme 3 Intro

June 10, 2022

Heidi Trost

"Alice often perceives Charlie as just another barrage of alerts filled with jargon she doesn't understand."

Heidi Trost

When AI Becomes the User’s Point Person—and Point of Failure

August 7, 2025

Kayla Farrell

"Real estate data such as price per square foot varies widely by region, making system mapping challenging."

Kayla Farrell Chelsey Glasson Sean Fitzell Jared LeClerc

What It's Like To Be a User Researcher at Compass

March 12, 2021

Miles Orkin

"Ask yourself: are we having fun? Are we being authentic? Are we honoring our emotions? Those are the key questions."

Miles Orkin

Creativity and Culture

November 8, 2018

Chris Geison

"The questions workshop is about surfacing unknowns, assumptions, and turning them into aligned research opportunities."

Chris Geison

What is Research Strategy?

March 11, 2021

Shawna Hein

"We treat our shared tooling and design system as a product with a dedicated team maintaining reusable components and governance."

Shawna Hein Kevin Hoffman

Create a Cohesive Civic Design Practice Across Agency, Vendors, and Contracts

November 17, 2022

Ian Johnson

"What if you didn’t know there were important questions you should be asking in your data?"

Ian Johnson

Latent Scope: Finding structure in unstructured data

June 11, 2025

John Cutler

"Executives only like things in threes, but if you do a three by three, you can get away with nine boxes—that's the max executive information processing."

John Cutler

The Alignment Trap

November 29, 2023