Summary
Executive leadership typically requires leadership for the company or organization at large, not just of one’s team or functional discipline. While my day job is leading a team responsible for delivering work and informing the product-making process, I’ve also had to weigh how much to apply the researcher mindset to challenges and opportunities outside my team’s direct purviews. For example, do I point out methodological concerns in our company-wide surveys? Or do I challenge other teams to cite the unnamed “data” used to define decision-making outside of my team’s scope. And how do I remember that pointing out problems always comes with the obligation to help solve them? I will share how I navigate the challenge of leveraging my research skills and energy - and that of my team – without cannibalizing or de-prioritizing the product-related work of my team.
Key Insights
-
•
Leadership requires balancing the needs of the research team with the broader organization's goals, creating tension in prioritization.
-
•
Researchers instinctively seek more data, but leaders must often make decisions with limited information, which is uncomfortable for research-minded people.
-
•
Research quality compromises, like double-barreled survey questions, often stem from real-world constraints rather than poor design.
-
•
Leadership involves adopting new mindsets beyond data analysis, including communication, influence, and accountability at scale.
-
•
The identity of being a leader can be harder to recognize and define compared to the clear identity of being a researcher.
-
•
Evangelizing high-quality research practices across a large company is a continuous challenge and responsibility for research leaders.
-
•
Transparency with teams about difficult trade-offs helps manage tensions when company priorities override team interests.
-
•
The physical organizational placement of a research team (e.g., UX vs. strategy) influences its scope, priorities, and impact.
-
•
Leadership success often depends on managing outwardly and building broad networks rather than only leading downward.
-
•
Discomfort in the dual role of researcher and leader is inevitable and can be embraced as part of personal and professional growth.
Notable Quotes
"I don’t exactly even know who I am if not a researcher."
"That’s because you’re thinking with your research hat on, not your UX leadership hat."
"Leadership is a mode, not a title, and anyone can be a leader."
"The leadership response in business often has to be: we will make the best decision possible given what we know."
"I fumed that my idea had been ignored, wondering if it was because I was new, a woman, brown, or had a PhD."
"Research run rampant — anyone feeling empowered to do research can sometimes cause quality challenges."
"I have a tagline my team is tired of hearing: about 50% of work is getting it done and 50% is getting it used."
"I am responsible not just for insights but for my team's well-being, legal commitments, and fiduciary responsibilities."
"Sometimes being a leader means making decisions that feel like high stakes gambling with incomplete data."
"Transparency and honesty are the only ways I handle difficult questions about compromises for the greater good."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Sometimes our most valuable work isn’t the insights we produce, but the conditions we create for shared reasoning across paradigms."
Kurt McCullochFaster alone, further together: Rebuilding collaboration in the age of AI research
March 10, 2026
"There are no screen readers built in for VR/AR yet; accessibility is still considered a hack in these spaces."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
November 18, 2022
"There’s no good answer yet for how to resolve the inequities created by differential access to digital technology."
Leah BuleyClosing Plenary: The Crisis of Digital
March 31, 2020
"I hope you’ll come out of the day feeling energized and excited about the opportunities and the possibilities."
Christian CrumlishIntroduction by our Conference Chair
December 6, 2022
"Until we clarify our language, we’ll agree on everything but not truly agree."
Stephen AndersonPuzzled? How to Coordinate Humans for Complex Challenges
May 27, 2021
"Service experiences are only as inclusive as their weakest checkpoint."
Gabriela BarnevaOperationalizing Inclusive Design in Service Design
November 20, 2025
"AI tech debt has compounding interest to it."
Jay BustamanteNavigating the Ethical Frontier: DesignOps Strategies for Responsible AI Innovation
October 2, 2023
"Surveys are products too, so they need to be iteratively tested."
Chris EngledowlA Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust
April 28, 2023
"People don’t share their beliefs; you have to search for and understand them to get true buy-in."
Dave GrayLiminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
May 14, 2015