Lessening the Research Burden on Vulnerable Communities
Summary
Key Insights
-
•
Long, in-depth interviews may be inappropriate or harmful when working with vulnerable populations.
-
•
Vulnerability is multidimensional and often invisible; appearances can be deceiving.
-
•
Recruitment through cultural brokers and local leaders fosters trust and fairness.
-
•
Offering collective or in-kind compensation can be more culturally appropriate than individual cash payments.
-
•
Using local proverbs can improve participant understanding of informed consent in low literacy contexts.
-
•
Researchers must establish referral pathways to address trauma or crises uncovered during studies.
-
•
Minimizing collected data and avoiding identifiable photos reduces privacy risks.
-
•
Giving participants control over their data and imagery enhances ethical research partnerships.
-
•
Community advisory boards can validate research findings and ensure accurate representation.
-
•
Embedding research within community-led processes reduces the extractive nature of typical methods.
Notable Quotes
"Naming is an exercise in power when what is being named has been historically erased."
"Vulnerable communities aren't always carrying signs with the word vulnerability spelled out on their forehead."
"You cannot force a dog to run — illustrating that participants have the liberty to stop or skip uncomfortable questions."
"We structured the research around helping them fill out their housing application at the same time, so we were mindful of their time and they would also get something out of it."
"Compensation in cash or something as close to cash as possible is the best way to go, but sometimes collective donations work better."
"Researchers are not trained mental health professionals, so having referral paths is essential when issues arise."
"It's unwise for us to intervene when we're not equipped to close the doors that would be opened in doing so."
"We allowed participants to look at all the photos taken and decide which ones to keep or delete."
"Community advisory boards were elected by their peers to review findings and ensure accuracy."
"Ways to reduce extraction in research is by embedding community-led practices rather than holding the keys to knowledge ourselves."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Google’s photo algorithm mistakenly tagged Black people as gorillas, which was called out by Jackie Elsene."
Nancy DouyonWe'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex
June 15, 2018
"There’s a frustrating gap between what a designer envisions and what actually gets implemented, leaving live prototypes inconsistent."
Jack BeharHow to Build Prototypes that Behave like an End-Product
December 6, 2022
"Politics and ego conflicts are inevitable and separate challenges that seriously impact merger integration."
Jorge ArangoMeeting of the Waters: Designing for Successful Inorganic Growth
August 12, 2021
"If you’re in a big company, think smaller to work bigger — narrow your focus rather than get distracted by every shiny tool."
Jon White Erin MayUnsticking Research for Better Information Flow
March 11, 2026
"Leading your path through ambiguity as a designer sometimes means teaching younger PMs how to work with you."
Jessamyn EdwardsSurviving Your UX Career in Enterprise Design
December 2, 2021
"The highest impact levers for long-term transformation exist in technical infrastructure and operations."
Stefanie OwensOptimizing for Outcomes: Transformation Design in Systems at Scale
December 4, 2024
"We’re not designing for people, we’re designing with them."
Ron BronsonDesign, Consequences & Everyday Life
November 18, 2022
"Imagine a world where research bots at IBM talk to the Rosen bot to give you better guidance on interpreting research."
Louis RosenfeldThe Rosenbot and the Rosenverse: An AMA with Lou Rosenfeld
June 5, 2024
"Every small initiative can lead to significant change when multiplied across communities."
Ash BrownSilver Linings: What DesignOps Learned in the Shift to WFH
October 23, 2020