Summary
Product teams, including those I work with, struggle to overcome the grinding momentum of product delivery timelines to make room for adequate discovery, learning, and application through research. The game of product development becomes fiercer when it's not the first time, but the fourth team assembled to tackle a complex product space. In well-trod territory, strong opinions may abound, and talking past each other and rehashing approaches is rampant. Challenges that face researchers as partners in product development include establishing a sense of shared team vision, separating facts from fiction, and moving the team past hang-ups to establish a research strategy and product direction. This case introduces the idea of "grinding momentum" and outlines a stakeholder engagement process known as a FOG session that helps all team members across functional expertise areas claim voice, hear others, and share in collective aha moments that define next steps. Using a mixed-methods approach, a process is outlined to frameshift the value of existing knowledge spanning many departments within an organization, bring together distinct expertise vocabularies and analyses, and propel product partners to identify true knowledge gaps.
Key Insights
-
•
Research is often perceived as slow but actually enables faster product velocity by clarifying decisions.
-
•
Daniel Kahneman’s System 1 (intuitive) and System 2 (analytical) thinking both complement each other in decision-making.
-
•
Expert intuition requires regularity, practice, and immediate feedback to be reliable, conditions rarely met in novel product contexts.
-
•
Organizations mature in information processing by adding departments: starting with intuition (product teams), then data, and finally research teams for deeper analysis.
-
•
Product teams often over-rely on intuitive thinking, leading to overconfidence and misalignment.
-
•
Grinding momentum is a shared team pressure to move fast without adequate foundational knowledge, risking poor decisions.
-
•
The FOG method (Facts, Opinions, Guesses) helps teams slow down, separate evidence from assumptions, and surface knowledge gaps.
-
•
Facilitated FOG sessions enable democratic participation, uncover tensions, and establish shared mental models for product direction.
-
•
Research should be positioned as a partner in knowledge creation rather than an arbiter of absolute truth, shifting power dynamics.
-
•
Dealing with bad data or assumed facts requires active researcher intervention to analyze artifacts and reframe discussions constructively.
Notable Quotes
"Slowing down with research can help us move faster overall."
"Intuition is knowing without knowing how you know, I just know it."
"Expert intuition can be right or wrong because it relies on cues and heuristics in uncertain contexts."
"Research is the most analytical form of information processing because it involves active knowledge generation."
"Most product decisions look intuitive, but intuition alone leads to coherent stories that can be wrong."
"Research is sometimes perceived as intuitive and therefore dismissed as insufficient for decision-making."
"Grinding momentum is a shared mental model that pushes teams to decide quickly without shared foundational knowledge."
"The FOG method helps teams separate facts from fiction and move past hangups toward alignment."
"The goal is to turn research into a partner in shared discovery, not just an arbiter of truth."
"If a stakeholder claims something is a fact without evidence, it is our responsibility as researchers to challenge and unpack that."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Using systems tools is only about 5% of my day-to-day work; I handpick them to meaningfully engage stakeholders."
Boon Yew ChewMaking Sense of Systems—and Using Systems to Make Sense of the Enterprise
June 6, 2023
"You shouldn’t send another survey unless you’ve implemented changes and allowed time for behavior to adapt."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"We have a moral duty to bring global conversations back to local communities to increase diversity and richness."
Patrizia Bertini Alexandra Mengoni LeónPushing DesignOps’ Influence into New Global Markets
September 9, 2022
"Design Ops needs to be flexible and change as the organization and culture evolve."
Jacqui FreyScale is Social Work
March 19, 2020
"Find somebody else with a really big problem and go solve it for them using your tools. Don’t even talk about what design is."
Robert SchwartzWe're Here for the Humans
June 9, 2017
"I have learned not to hold on too tightly to the ideas I’ve constructed about myself."
Tamara HaleWar Stories LIVE! Tamara Hale
March 30, 2020
"Burnout exists because we made rest a reward rather than a right."
Zariah CameronReDesigning Wellbeing for Equitable Care in the Workplace
September 23, 2024
"Product design roles today usually expect a mix of interaction design and visual design skills."
Dave Hoffer Joanne WeaverUX Job Search AMA #3 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
July 16, 2025
"If rapid research findings create more questions but you don’t have time to address them, it’s probably not the right method."
Feleesha SterlingBuilding a Rapid Research Program
May 18, 2023
