Rosenverse
Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment

Gold
Tuesday, March 28, 2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Share the love for this talk
Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment
Speakers: Kristen Guth, Ph.D.
Link:

Summary

Product teams, including those I work with, struggle to overcome the grinding momentum of product delivery timelines to make room for adequate discovery, learning, and application through research. The game of product development becomes fiercer when it's not the first time, but the fourth team assembled to tackle a complex product space. In well-trod territory, strong opinions may abound, and talking past each other and rehashing approaches is rampant. Challenges that face researchers as partners in product development include establishing a sense of shared team vision, separating facts from fiction, and moving the team past hang-ups to establish a research strategy and product direction. This case introduces the idea of "grinding momentum" and outlines a stakeholder engagement process known as a FOG session that helps all team members across functional expertise areas claim voice, hear others, and share in collective aha moments that define next steps. Using a mixed-methods approach, a process is outlined to frameshift the value of existing knowledge spanning many departments within an organization, bring together distinct expertise vocabularies and analyses, and propel product partners to identify true knowledge gaps.

Key Insights

  • •

    Research is often perceived as slow but actually enables faster product velocity by clarifying decisions.

  • •

    Daniel Kahneman’s System 1 (intuitive) and System 2 (analytical) thinking both complement each other in decision-making.

  • •

    Expert intuition requires regularity, practice, and immediate feedback to be reliable, conditions rarely met in novel product contexts.

  • •

    Organizations mature in information processing by adding departments: starting with intuition (product teams), then data, and finally research teams for deeper analysis.

  • •

    Product teams often over-rely on intuitive thinking, leading to overconfidence and misalignment.

  • •

    Grinding momentum is a shared team pressure to move fast without adequate foundational knowledge, risking poor decisions.

  • •

    The FOG method (Facts, Opinions, Guesses) helps teams slow down, separate evidence from assumptions, and surface knowledge gaps.

  • •

    Facilitated FOG sessions enable democratic participation, uncover tensions, and establish shared mental models for product direction.

  • •

    Research should be positioned as a partner in knowledge creation rather than an arbiter of absolute truth, shifting power dynamics.

  • •

    Dealing with bad data or assumed facts requires active researcher intervention to analyze artifacts and reframe discussions constructively.

Notable Quotes

"Slowing down with research can help us move faster overall."

"Intuition is knowing without knowing how you know, I just know it."

"Expert intuition can be right or wrong because it relies on cues and heuristics in uncertain contexts."

"Research is the most analytical form of information processing because it involves active knowledge generation."

"Most product decisions look intuitive, but intuition alone leads to coherent stories that can be wrong."

"Research is sometimes perceived as intuitive and therefore dismissed as insufficient for decision-making."

"Grinding momentum is a shared mental model that pushes teams to decide quickly without shared foundational knowledge."

"The FOG method helps teams separate facts from fiction and move past hangups toward alignment."

"The goal is to turn research into a partner in shared discovery, not just an arbiter of truth."

"If a stakeholder claims something is a fact without evidence, it is our responsibility as researchers to challenge and unpack that."

Ask the Rosenbot
Catt Small
Craft a Vision that Actually Gets Shipped
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Corey Long
Hiring in DesignOps: A Critical Study on How to Hire and Get Hired
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Taylor Klassman
Shaping the Next Era of UX Research: Collaborative Forum
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Jackie Velasquez-Ross
Talent Acquisition and Our Responsibility
2020 • DesignOps Community
Louis Rosenfeld
Do you want to work on climate? (Climate UX Discussion Series)
2023 • Climate UX Interest Group
Abby Covert
Stuck? Diagrams Help
2022 • DesignOps Community
Melissa Eggleston
Practical People Skills for Building Trust on Teams and with Partners
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Miles Orkin
Creativity and Culture
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Lada Gorlenko
Theme 1: Discussion
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Amy Marquez
INVEST: Discussion
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
George Zhang
UX Research Excellence Framework
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Mariah Hay
BUILD: Discussion
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Vanessa Varin
Feedback: The Other F-Word
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Neema Mahdavi
Operationalizing DesignOps
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
John Calhoun
Meters, Miles, and Madness: New Frameworks to Measure the (Elusive) Value of DesignOps
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Rebecca Topps
Planning and conducting remote usability studies for accessibility
2020 • Advancing Research Community

More Videos

Corey Long

"I submitted 710 applications throughout the year and only 7% of those resulted in interviews."

Corey Long

Hiring in DesignOps: A Critical Study on How to Hire and Get Hired

September 23, 2024

Sarah Auslander

"Building trust within organizations toward methods and processes is essential to onboarding new ways of working."

Sarah Auslander Betsy Ramaccia Gordon Ross

Insights Panel

November 18, 2022

Lisa Welchman

"Every bad thing that can happen in the real world can now happen on the internet — and every good thing too."

Lisa Welchman

Cleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers

June 14, 2018

Lena Shenkarenko

"Every small action counts when it comes to sustainability in urban settings."

Lena Shenkarenko

Collaborative Wireframing for Creating Team Alignment and Shipping Better Products

October 21, 2020

Christian Bason

"We have to design not just for humans but for other life forms on this planet."

Christian Bason

Expand—Rethinking Design for Public Challenges

September 14, 2022

Nicole Umphress

"We used Trello in a new way, creating boards for each week with cards representing tasks participants could complete asynchronously."

Nicole Umphress

Delivering Design Education During a Global Pandemic: Lessons Learned

June 9, 2022

Jim Kalbach

"Jazz soloists draw from a lifetime of patterns, sometimes quoting TV theme songs like the Muppets or Sanford and Son."

Jim Kalbach

Jazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration

November 6, 2017

Bob Baxley

"Design-led does not need design-led—meaning leadership should push design mindset beyond just the design function."

Bob Baxley

Theme 4: Intro

January 8, 2024

Megan Campos

"If we just decide to ignore demographics we're missing huge swaths of the participant experience and an opportunity to better serve our users."

Megan Campos

What Did I Miss? The Hidden Costs of Deprioritizing Diversity in User Research

March 12, 2021

Latest Books All books