Summary
Oftentimes companies rely on recruiting agencies to handle finding participants for their research. While there are some advantages to this approach, and cases where outsourcing is the best option, nowadays bringing research in-house can be simple, flexible, cost-effective, and fast. Learn more about how and why to bring your recruiting in-house.
Key Insights
-
•
Transitioning to in-house recruitment can drastically reduce turnaround times.
-
•
Using User Interviews allows researchers to start projects instantly, without agency delays.
-
•
Researchers gain transparency and control over participant recruitment processes.
-
•
In-house recruitment can be significantly more cost-effective than hiring agencies.
-
•
Direct communication with participants can lower no-show rates and enhance engagement.
-
•
Flexibility in scheduling helps researchers manage their time more effectively.
-
•
The ease of modifying participant criteria on platforms like User Interviews reduces recruitment challenges.
-
•
In-house platforms often include fraud detection tools to avoid professional testers.
-
•
The user-friendly interface of recruitment tools improves the overall research workflow.
-
•
Building relationships with participants through communication fosters trust and better results.
Notable Quotes
"You can actually just start your project right away."
"Doing it is super simple. You just go on to your account and launch a project."
"The first qualified participant comes in at a median average time of only three hours."
"When you're working with an agency, sometimes you can get a list, like a spreadsheet, but it's not always shared."
"User interviews is super easy to get in contact with them."
"I can just send them a message and it helps with just a reminder."
"You’re only going to pay for successfully completed sessions."
"You can actually message them through a messaging portal."
"With User Interviews, there’s no upfront cost when you launch a project."
"User interviews allow you to sync with your Google Calendar."
More Videos
"Design is a poorly designed word."
John MaedaMaking Sense of Enterprise UX
June 9, 2016
"The way to think about it is in a simple way: how do we support this thinking style?"
Indi YoungThinking styles: Mend hidden cracks in your market
January 8, 2025
"Rapid experimentation leads to insights, which in turn fuel innovation."
Chris ChapoData Science and Design: A Tale of Two Tribes
May 13, 2015
"Time management in collaboration is more than just meeting deadlines."
Elizabeth ChurchillExploring Cadence: You, Your Team, and Your Enterprise
June 8, 2017
"We faced challenges as individuals like human connections and networking."
Rusha SopariwalaRemote, Together: Craft and Collaboration Across Disciplines, Borders, Time Zones, and a Design Org of 170+
June 9, 2022
"Human-centered design makes you feel like we're centering on humans, but that is not always true."
George AyeThat Quiet Little Voice: When Design and Ethics Collide
November 16, 2022
"Our mental, physical, and emotional bandwidth is like a battery that fluctuates between being fully charged and completely depleted."
Ariba JahanTeam Resiliency Through a Pandemic
January 8, 2024
"Design can help create a better world by fostering empathy and collaboration."
Julie Gitlin Esther RaiceDesign as an Agent of Digital Transformation at JPMC
June 9, 2021
"As designers, we can decide what data is required for our applications to work."
Matteo GrattonCan Data and Ethics Live Together?
October 1, 2021
