Summary
For the past year, “Having a seat at the table” has been one of the most widely-discussed topics in the research community. However, what happens once that seat has been won? What we’ve typically seen is researchers struggling to discern between the specific needs and expectations of senior leadership and stakeholders, and those of the product teams they’re grown accustomed to working with. This presentation will distill, from several previous studies, lessons to guide researchers in how to go from just having a seat at the table, to actually using it towards influence strategic decision-making.
Key Insights
-
•
Senior leaders usually prefer strong opinions and clear next steps over detailed research methodologies.
-
•
Researchers often talk to leadership as if they were peers, causing a gap in communication effectiveness.
-
•
The discipline of research has evolved from seeking approval to demanding inclusion at decision-making forums.
-
•
Many researchers already have a metaphorical seat at the table, evidenced by leadership referencing and using their work.
-
•
Analyzing how stakeholders communicate—positive, fact-based, or intensity-driven—helps tailor messages for greater impact.
-
•
Effective storytelling for leadership means creating memorable, high-level narratives rather than comprehensive reports.
-
•
Research teams must start involvement well before formal planning cycles to influence investment decisions.
-
•
Closing the feedback loop by gathering stakeholder responses post-decision is crucial but often overlooked.
-
•
Cultural differences, such as inductive versus deductive reasoning, affect how research findings should be presented.
-
•
Understanding stakeholders’ goals and language (e.g., metrics like revenue or user engagement) improves researcher alignment and influence.
Notable Quotes
"VPs want to know what you really think. They want to see your insights distilled into a clear position of what needs to be done next."
"We have been focused for so long on getting that seat that we haven’t realized that a lot of us are actually already there."
"The moment they begin to shift their thinking and make decisions based on that work, they’re actually giving you a seat."
"Different people communicate in different ways, and understanding those ways gives you the key to convincing them."
"People broadly fall into three communication styles: positive, fact-based, and intensity-based."
"Telling the right story means creating a memorable shorthand that leaders can reference when they're at other tables."
"Closing the loop by understanding when and why recommendations don’t get adopted is probably the most easily actionable piece of advice I can give."
"Stakeholders aren’t leaving us out on purpose; they make reasonable decisions with imperfect information."
"The single most important thing we can do at the table is expanding the boundaries of knowledge for decision makers."
"If you understand their language—gross merchandising value, monthly recurring revenue, daily active users—you speak their world."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Teams with different thought worlds should start with who they are, what their roles are, and their passions inside and outside work."
Lin NieWhen Thought-worlds Collide: Collaborating Between Research and Practice
March 10, 2021
"Accept that the first iteration won’t be 100% accessible; moving the needle bit by bit still creates huge impact."
Suzan Bednarz Hilary SunderlandAccessibilityOps for All
January 8, 2024
"Research isn’t linear; it’s messy and modular, so your tools have to reflect that fluidity."
Sofia QuinteroThe Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ
March 10, 2021
"Big picture thinkers move past obstacles and create unexpected paths and new solutions."
Sol MeszHands or Brains? How to Hire for Strategy, Strategically
January 8, 2024
"If you work with humans, you work with trauma. Assume everybody carries some form of vulnerability."
Matt Bernius Sarah Fathallah Hera Hussain Jessica Zéroual-KaraTrauma-informed Research: A Panel Discussion
October 7, 2021
"Creating and holding space is like putting bumpers up in bowling so people know they won’t fail if they engage."
Gina MendoliaTherapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems
December 3, 2024
"The Silicon Valley dream is a problematic ideology that normalizes what the correct research looks like and excludes others."
Verónica Urzúa Jorge MontielThe B-side of the Research Impact
March 12, 2021
"At Dell, 90% of my design team was white and overwhelmingly male—a sharp contrast from my earlier team."
Lisanne NormanWhy I Left Research
March 27, 2023
"Treat your stakeholders like research participants — listen openly and without judgment."
Ovetta SampsonTurning UX Passion into Real Product Influence
June 7, 2023
