The Power of Difficult Conversations: A Case Study on How We Introduced Design Ops in the Federal Government Space
Summary
A large federal agency was interested in improving the experience that individuals have with their digital services, as well as the velocity at which they were able to improve those services. But through our research, we found that they didn't have the design roles, tools, or processes in place to support this goal and make it successful. As a digital services firm that specializes in human-centered design and design ops, we came up with a plan to get them where they needed to be. We started by having a difficult conversation with them about design maturity, what it would take to be successful, and how design ops could help. We then introduced a series of training sessions on human-centered design, which prepared us to have conversations about design roles and processes, as well as tools. And finally, we were able to collaborate with them through a series of engagements to see how these things should work in practice. Through our experience, we learned this is not an uncommon challenge. There are likely many entities (both public and private) that know they need to evolve their design practices, but don’t know how. By sharing how we introduced design ops to a federal client, we hope to inspire others to help promulgate design ops in a wider variety of sectors and client types.
Key Insights
-
•
Federal government contracting imposes long timelines, strict policies, and limited tool adoption, challenging UX implementation.
-
•
Initial contracts may have fixed scopes that do not align with the actual user or organizational needs discovered later.
-
•
The agency’s design maturity was at a limited stage, lacking strategic UX culture, process integration, and measurable outcomes.
-
•
Delivering a design system without addressing foundational cultural and process barriers is insufficient for sustainable UX improvements.
-
•
Human-centered design training for non-designers builds empathy and broadens organizational understanding of UX benefits.
-
•
Government teams often rely on outdated or inappropriate tools like MS Paint, hindering effective design communication.
-
•
Internal champions, especially design managers on related teams, are crucial for advocacy and change management.
-
•
Combining top-down support and bottom-up engagement helps overcome entrenched silos and fosters adoption of design ops.
-
•
Frequent design reviews and biweekly syncs, though initially resisted, can become valued forums that enhance product quality.
-
•
Change in government design culture is incremental, often non-linear, requiring patience, persistence, and difficult conversations.
Notable Quotes
"It pains me to say, one of the tools they were using was MS Paint."
"Dropping a design system in this environment was not going to magically get them the improved experience they hoped for."
"It was finally the pathway to get them what they really wanted: a more intuitive and consistent user experience."
"People who work in government tech are some of the most passionate because they believe in the mission."
"Government culture is not like tech culture; IT constraints mean tools like Sketch are still a win."
"We basically wrote an HCD book with 25,000 words of notes for the training workshop."
"Early on, getting stakeholders to attend syncs felt like pulling teeth, but later it became their favorite meeting."
"Design ops is the bridge between silos and agencies that otherwise tend to be somewhat stagnant."
"Don’t ever be afraid to have those difficult conversations because they’re the most important ones to have."
"It’s about getting our stakeholders what they need, not just what they ask for."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"When we first started, we didn’t know what the hell we were doing and learned from each other."
Meredith Black Elyse HornbacherBuilding Community and Common Trends to Look for in 2021
December 17, 2020
"It's not about going out to communities but changing your team and leadership to genuinely reflect those communities."
Tricia WangThe most popular design thinking strategy is BS
January 27, 2022
"You don’t want so much governance that people can’t be creative, but you need just enough to help their process."
Michael LandEstablishing Design Operations in Government
February 18, 2021
"Leading indicators help you be on the front foot and act before a risk becomes a crisis."
Bassel Deeb Will OsbornDo More With Less: Equip and Lead Design Orgs Through Adversity
October 2, 2023
"We herded all of our unicorns and named them appropriately with clear, meaningful titles."
Tanya SnookDesigning the team experience: Building culture through onboarding
November 4, 2021
"We went from stitching wireframes to actually designing in code—no more simulacra."
Allan LowsonRehashing the Double Diamond: Collaborating across functions with AI-assisted prototyping
June 9, 2026
"We don’t put users in a position to make sustainability trade-offs; the design must do the heavy lifting upstream."
James ChudleyDecarbonising User Journeys: How minimising enables us to do more with less
February 19, 2025
"Sometimes it’s reasonable to consider your design as strategy and ship a piece now and other pieces later."
Scott Jensen Sarah Delaney Carmen LiuShort Take #2: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers
December 6, 2022
"We learned that hiring for the specific design team’s needs works better than a one-size-fits-all DPM approach."
Brennan HartichCommunicating and Establishing DesignOps as a New Function
November 7, 2018
