Research in the Pluriverse
Summary
There are many innovations in “research” that push the field forward. From inclusive research, democratizing research, fast research, futures research, and VR/AR research to mixed methods, agile research, participatory research, behavioral research, AI research, systems research, and trauma-responsive research; the future of research seems to be improving. However, the vast majority of innovations in “research” work at the outer surface of “research,” leaving the Anglocentric core of “research,” along with its assumptions and views, fundamentally untouched. Interestingly, only a tiny percentage of research is done by people we call researchers. The vast majority of research is done by people around the world in the service of their hyperlocal being and doing, their aspirations, livelihoods, survival, visions, thriving, and problem-solving. With their inspiration, what happens when we break away from this UNIverse, this one-world world with only one center, one globalizing Westernized understanding and control of research and knowledge? What happens when we enter a world of many centers and many understandings of knowledge and research that come from various ways of being in the world? What happens when we acknowledge and enter the pluralistic multiverse - the pluriverse? Let us explore what research in the pluriverse looks like and whether you are ready to embark on a pluriversal journey. It only requires a yes.
Key Insights
-
•
Colonial and modernist epistemologies have historically marginalized Indigenous and plural ways of knowing by privileging only one rigid form of 'truth'.
-
•
Knowledge exists in multiple forms including embodied, energetic, spiritual, relational, aesthetic, and lived experiential, not just institutional scientific knowledge.
-
•
Research should not be reduced to data collection or problem solving but viewed as relational storytelling, cultural preservation, and community stewardship.
-
•
Pluralistic research values diverse methods including fable-based, dance-based, musicological, and art-based approaches embedded in specific local contexts.
-
•
Relational research focuses on building and sustaining relationships through which knowledge naturally flows, rather than extracting data from subjects.
-
•
Poverty and ignorance can be reframed as a lack of healthy relationships that facilitate the flow of resources and knowledge.
-
•
Some colonial researchers have begun rejecting extractive methodologies, choosing instead to transform institutions by embracing pluralistic research practices.
-
•
Research rigor in pluralistic approaches is defined by community health, survival, and approval rather than solely by coding or synthesis frameworks.
-
•
The plural reversal challenges one dominant universal order, advocating for a pluriverse of coexisting knowledge systems and ontologies.
-
•
Language and place govern research practice in Indigenous contexts, with local mother tongues essential to accessing and preserving knowledge.
Notable Quotes
"I want a story that moves and quakes me, palpitates my heart and shakes me."
"There was a time when people vastly prioritized truth over story, claiming to know all things and bring everything to the light."
"Mainstream institutional knowledge is just a study of aesthetic, energetic, intuitive, embodied, relational, community and cultural knowledge."
"We lived a better story worlding and restoring, but the system did not respond or change."
"Research was always, but finally became relational story, storytelling sacred holding rich communion community."
"Poverty isn’t the absence of money. Poverty is the absence of relationships."
"Relational research builds relationships and the knowledge automatically flows."
"Plural reversal is a world of many sensors where no one way of knowing cannibalizes the others."
"Research doesn’t have a governing methodology; there is only presence, place, relationship, and practice."
"Language learning is a required component of the work because so much knowledge and values are stored in the language."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"John Rucklin said if your questionnaire isn’t relevant, you can devise your own — and that’s what we did with the Accessible Usability Scale."
Sam ProulxSUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
September 29, 2021
"The Pinocchio pattern is about turning an idea, a concept, into a working reality with machine intelligence as a collaborator."
Josh Clark Veronika KindredSentient Design, AI, and the Radically Adaptive Experience (1st of 3 seminars)
January 15, 2025
"Democratizing research is okay as long as we remain experts in rigorous methods and question questionable research kindly."
Taylor KlassmanShaping the Next Era of UX Research: Collaborative Forum
March 11, 2025
"AI moderation did not make the research easier. It made it possible under real world constraints."
Tara TresselInvestigating qualitative depth of AI-moderated interviews
March 10, 2026
"Communications authored for one cultural group may have limited engagement from others, underscoring the need for tailored messaging."
Angy Peterson Bob AinsburyMore Than Technology: Personalized Public Sector Experiences
December 10, 2021
"People often think qualitative research is easier, but it’s hard and easy in different ways depending on who you are."
Jemma Ahmed Steve Carrod Chris Geison Dr. Shadi Janansefat Christopher NashDemocratization: Working with it, not against it [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
July 24, 2024
"You have to hold people’s hands through your organization—not just hype about AI."
Erika FlowersAI-Readiness: Preparing NASA for a Data-Driven, Agile Future
June 10, 2025
"We rejected a studio model because designers should take business direction from the teams they’re embedded in."
Marc Rettig Julie Baher Phil Gilbert Nathan ShedroffDiscussion
May 14, 2015
"Planning is essential, but plans are useless."
Jen BriselliLearning Is The Engine: Designing & Adapting in a World We Can’t Predict
April 16, 2025