Summary
As part of a MHCLG funded transformation programme, we were tasked with redesigning an outdated, manual planning system into one fit for the 21st century. Planning officers were grappling with systems that didn’t meet their needs. They were spending a lot of time on manual tasks and dealing with the impacts of human error. Our brief was to deliver a planning service designed by its users, in this case local authority planning officers. We took a radical approach of embedding with a team of subject matter experts, sharing knowledge around digital and agile as we went. This approach meant that user needs drove every action we took but also that the transformation of thinking and approaches from agile and service design started to have an impact on the local authorities themselves. We developed a set of design principles to keep both user needs and our collective vision at the heart of the process with a focus on moving from documents to data, reducing ‘noise’ and bringing the right information to users at the right time.
Key Insights
-
•
Service designers should take responsibility for the long-term viability, not just initial functionality, of services they develop.
-
•
Embedding agile practices within public sector teams helps break linear, siloed development habits common in government.
-
•
Planning officers can evolve from domain experts to empowered collaborators and product owners within digital service teams.
-
•
Close interdisciplinary collaboration between designers and developers leads to shorter iteration cycles and better solutions.
-
•
Design principles focused on moving from documents to data and reducing noise guided development effectively.
-
•
Creating a platform that allows planners to assemble new application types themselves enabled rapid service expansion.
-
•
Service design scope needs to expand beyond users to include procurement, funding, policy, and ecosystem-level viability.
-
•
Building communities and coalitions across councils and government bodies is key to sustained adoption and service evolution.
-
•
Long-term impact includes up to 30% reduction in application processing time and fewer human errors.
-
•
Service designers must be flexible with roles and tools, focusing on learning and human-centered approaches to meet complex challenges.
Notable Quotes
"Should service designers have a role in the long-term viability of the services they develop? Our answer is yes."
"A viable service is one that not only functions well but can also develop, grow, and flourish."
"Rather than handing off work, our designers and developers work side by side through sketching, testing, and iteration."
"Planning officers became product owners, gaining confidence in agile and design processes through ongoing involvement."
"We shifted from building each application type individually to creating a platform that planners can use to build their own."
"Service design isn’t about the tools but the way of thinking to approach any problem with a humanist approach."
"Procurement in local government favors old, single-sale products, making adoption of new services challenging despite long-term savings."
"Our role shifted toward building communities that tackle common challenges and build a robust ecosystem."
"The coalition of the willing has organically developed into a community for change."
"Change is fundamentally about people—our approach lives out agile principles in service design to create a team that can build."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"UX research often becomes tactical and siloed, limiting its strategic influence and risking burnout."
Nicole Aleong Michaela Mora Prayag Narula Brianna SylverWhat UX research can learn from other research practices [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
September 14, 2023
"You are not the first person to try something like this, and they’re typically not looking forward to the next transformation."
Laura KleinUnique challenges of innovation in enterprises
April 23, 2020
"Everything is an experiment."
Erin WeigelReal-world lessons to improve your conversion rates
June 26, 2024
"Our design ops career ladder has been revised three times in four years — that’s what innovation looks like."
Changying (Z) ZhengNavigating Innovation with Integrity
September 25, 2024
"We could either become an internal service desk that's always at capacity or find a lever that multiplies our impact."
Dagmara KukawkaTiny team, moonshot impact: Democratizing research across continents
March 10, 2026
"Assistive technology is a tool; we need to make sure we enable that tool to do its job."
Elana Chapman Li Wen Huang Divyen Sanganee Annabel WeinerGetting started with accessibility research
February 20, 2025
"When product says no to design, it’s not personal—it’s about prioritization and what’s most urgent right now."
Iain McMaster IHan ChengDesign and Product: from Frenemy to Harmony
November 29, 2023
"If you’re amazing at your job but no one listens to your research or design, does it really have impact?"
Ian SwinsonDesigning and Driving UX Careers
June 8, 2016
"Breaking a habit path can cause users to repeatedly retry workflows, leading to frustration and cognitive overload."
Paula BachImproving Legacy Software: How Much Better Does it Have to Be?
March 11, 2022
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
Where can UX researchers find reliable, up-to-date information and recommendations on research tool options?
What are effective behaviors that design operations teams should focus on to deliver value and build trust?
What are best practices for onboarding and operationalizing UX research tools post-procurement to ensure adoption?