Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
Four of your research colleagues discussed and defended their respective positions (below) on the impact of AI on user research. Participants engaged in a discussion and Q&A, facilitated by Dr. Jamika D. Burge. “AI has the potential to be the researcher's best friend, by doing all the heavy lifting associated with analysis - but it also has the potential to cause unimaginable damage”. – Nick Fine “Researchers absolutely must learn to create AI prompts. Not only will prompt engineering become an essential, required research skill, but it will also offer a much-needed opportunity to rethink our role as facilitators of change.” – Alexandra Jayeun Lee Soon, AI will be able to utilize the participant's feedback as a prompt to create RITE design variations on the fly, offering the researcher multiple flow options organically and in real time, which will radically transform our research practice.” – Greg Nudelman “UX Researchers can reinvent themselves as “delightful ethicists” who oversee ethics on critical issues when generative AI supplies abundant solutions without providing the why." – Bo Wang
Key Insights
-
•
AI poses both great risks and opportunities for UX research, with validity and bias being central concerns.
-
•
Inexperienced researchers relying on AI outputs without critical judgment risk spreading inaccurate insights.
-
•
Prompt engineering is emerging as a fundamental skill for UX researchers, similar to how coding became essential for designers.
-
•
AI can automate repetitive design tasks and rapid prototyping, enabling faster iteration and freeing researchers for higher-level strategy.
-
•
Moderated usability testing will not be fully replaced by AI due to the irreplaceable nature of human empathy and adaptive interaction.
-
•
UX researchers should evolve into 'delightful ethicists' leading ethical AI practices and guarding against 'dark AI' and synthetic users.
-
•
Ethics in AI extends beyond moral principles to everyday product decisions and protecting users from harm.
-
•
Bias is inherent in AI training data and tools; researchers must call out, understand, and address such bias explicitly.
-
•
Demonstrating tangible business value by linking user research to outcomes remains essential for maintaining researcher relevance.
-
•
Collective learning across disciplines and broadening AI literacy within the research community is critical to navigate AI’s impact.
Notable Quotes
"AI has as much capacity to do as much harm as it does good."
"It takes an experienced researcher to be able to wrangle AI prompts to have any chance of getting good work."
"Learning prompt engineering will make us better researchers in the same way coding helped designers."
"The best large language model is right under your nose: the human brain with 300,000 years of ancestral development."
"AI gives us superpowers to do rapid iterative testing and evaluation much faster than before."
"We should reinvent UX researchers to be delightful ethicists leading ethical concerns in AI adoption."
"AI cannot do empathy; moderated usability testing requires the human ability to pivot and connect."
"AI is biased by design; assume bias is in there, call it out, and then address it."
"User research's value lies in linking user needs and pain points directly to business profit and loss."
"If we don’t advocate for understanding AI, more decisions will be made without researchers, leading to unjust outcomes."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We subscribe to the F Buckminster Fuller quote: If you want to change someone’s way of thinking, don’t talk about thinking, give them a tool."
Andrew WebsterScaling Design Capability: How Involved Should You Be?
September 30, 2021
"When you’re smashing silos, the first wall you try to break through always gets bloody."
Kristen Honey"Let’s Talk About Data and Crisis”: Public Digital Service Delivery = Open Data + Human Centered Design
November 18, 2021
"Insights are not the end; they must lead to decisions and improved user outcomes."
Tala Tayebi Kelly Goto Jared SpoolVoice and influence in an age of noise
March 10, 2026
"We developed this research framework during our time at Uber together with an extended leadership team as the team grew from 30 to 100."
George Zhang Molly StevensUX Research Excellence Framework
March 11, 2021
"Hiring designers in non-design functions spreads headcount across sponsors so if one area faces cuts, the whole team doesn’t suffer."
Silke Bochat5 Antifragile Strategies for a DesignOps 2.0
September 23, 2024
"One of the best parts is seeing people from Ops, recruiting, marketing and product interacting together in Slack."
Roy Opata OlendeHow Zapier Uses ‘All Hands Research’ to Increase Exposure to Users
August 6, 2020
"We built a linear aggression model showing direct correlation between design problems and business metrics like referral revenue."
Panel Discussion: Communicating the Value of DesignOps
November 7, 2018
"Leadership is not about having all the answers but facilitating conversations with experts to find solutions."
Mariesa LenzWhat Beekeeping Taught me about Product Teams
October 29, 2025
"We’re not afraid to scrap rituals that don’t work anymore to protect time for deep work and be mindful of team energy."
Rusha SopariwalaRemote, Together: Craft and Collaboration Across Disciplines, Borders, Time Zones, and a Design Org of 170+
June 9, 2022
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
Why is design education’s emphasis on critical making important, and how does it interrelate with critique and theory?
How do tech clients typically expect transparency around AI use in research projects?
What are the benefits of reallocating time saved by AI into in-person immersive research activities?