Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
This interactive session takes a step beyond the introductory concepts of power to explore real-world tensions, trade-offs, and systemic barriers that make genuine power sharing a necessity in co-design. Though Power Sharing is not without challenge. Participants will unpack the difference between symbolic inclusion and true ownership, examining how institutional norms can unintentionally reinforce inequality even with 'lived experts' at the table. This session invites professionals, advocates, system designers, and lived experts alike to grapple with uncomfortable questions about who holds power and at what cost. It will equip participants with practical tools to recognize tokenism, navigate conflict, and build processes where lived experts drive true change.
Key Insights
-
•
Co-design is an approach that builds with, not for, communities by sharing power across the entire engagement.
-
•
Authentic lived experience must be directly relevant; proxies or near experiences risk diluting design intention.
-
•
Healing and trust-building are foundational to effective co-design, particularly given historical traumas in marginalized communities.
-
•
Power sharing requires explicit acknowledgment of power imbalances and establishing structures that allow community decision-making authority.
-
•
Participatory engagement should accommodate diverse communication and participation styles, including art, conversation, and digital formats.
-
•
Surveys tend to be less effective for trust-building and deep engagement compared to qualitative, relational methods like focus groups and one-on-ones.
-
•
Compensation for lived experts must be meaningful and equitable, recognizing their expertise as equally valuable as academic or professional input.
-
•
Removing participation barriers (e.g., childcare, internet access, food insecurity) is essential to equitable co-design processes.
-
•
A continuum of engagement—from ignoring to co-creating—helps organizations assess and evolve their community involvement strategies.
-
•
Innovations from lived experts are often practical and empathetic to systemic constraints, debunking myths about unrealistic demands.
Notable Quotes
"Together we can bridge the gap by incorporating lived expertise and knowledge through access and opportunity."
"If someone doesn’t have that direct lived experience, it’s not just enough to go to the closest thing you can find."
"We have a responsibility to help heal communities and build trust so we can do design with intention."
"Power is more than authority; it involves influence, privilege, and communication styles that shape dynamics."
"The same reason they hire us is the very reason why they fire us, because when things get real, it sometimes gets hard."
"You should never be engaging lived experts without compensating them for their time."
"When you’re doing a survey, think about if it can be done in a way that is much more accessible."
"Lived experts are the most innovative voice in the design process, bringing unique and practical solutions."
"Sometimes limitations mean you can’t fully co-create, but transparency about where you are on the engagement continuum matters."
"We want shared ownership and trust leading to community-led, informed, and sustainable outcomes."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If your leadership isn’t aligned to your agenda, it’s vital to negotiate and influence to bring them on board."
Karen PascoeDeveloping Experience Teams and Talent in the Enterprise
June 8, 2016
"Shared digital whiteboards are a game changer because stickies don’t fall off the wall and they enable collaborative design thinking remotely."
Wendy Johansson Surya VankaDesign at Scale: Behind the Scenes
April 29, 2021
"The people we’ve lost are not intelligent, gullible, or willfully ignorant. They’re victims of how design and technology amplify misinformation."
Mandy DrewWhat Role(s) Can Research Play in Responsible Design?
March 11, 2021
"If you do nothing, you cannot influence the future. Destination thinking shifts you from reactive to proactive future-oriented leadership."
Silke Bochat5 Antifragile Strategies for a DesignOps 2.0
September 23, 2024
"When executives start questioning your research details, that’s a good sign they’re engaged and trusting the process."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"Taking stakeholders on the journey by involving them in interviews really changed how they saw the product and business strategy."
Dr Chloe SharpUsing Evidence and Collaboration for Setting and Defending Priorities
November 29, 2023
"Communicate as much as possible and in different formats, because different formats resonate differently with people."
Michelle ChinThe DesignOps Starter Kit
September 29, 2021
"One hallmark of a healthy team is how well team members feel cared for so they can shine."
Kristin SkinnerTheme 2: Introduction and Provocation
January 8, 2024
"Many tech harms run counter to business goals and can be controversial to address."
Alexandra SchmidtWhy Ethics Can't Save Tech
November 18, 2022